Universally truthful secondary spectrum auctions

We present algorithms for implementing local spectrum redistribution in wireless networks using a mechanism design approach. For example, in single-hop request scheduling, secondary users are modeled as rational agents that have private utility when getting assigned a channel for successful transmission. We present a simple algorithmic technique that allows to turn existing and future approximation algorithms and heuristics into truthful mechanisms for a large variety of networking problems. Our approach works with virtually all known interference models in the literature, including the physical model of interference based on SINR. It allows to address single-hop and multi-hop scheduling, routing, and even more general assignment and allocation problems. Our mechanisms are randomized and represent the first universally-truthful mechanisms for these problems with rigorous worst-case guarantees on the solution quality. In this way, our mechanisms can be used to obtain guaranteed solution quality even with risk-averse or risk-seeking bidders, for which existing approaches fail.

[1]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[2]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[3]  Karhan Akcoglu,et al.  Opportunity Cost Algorithms for Combinatorial Auctions , 2000, ArXiv.

[4]  Klaus Jansen,et al.  Polynomial-time approximation schemes for geometric graphs , 2001, SODA '01.

[5]  Xia Zhou,et al.  TRUST: A General Framework for Truthful Double Spectrum Auctions , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[6]  Peng-Jun Wan,et al.  Multiflows in multihop wireless networks , 2009, MobiHoc '09.

[7]  Johann Hurink,et al.  Approximation schemes for wireless networks , 2008, TALG.

[8]  Zongpeng Li,et al.  A prior-free revenue maximizing auction for secondary spectrum access , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[9]  Michael Dinitz,et al.  Maximizing Capacity in Arbitrary Wireless Networks in the SINR Model: Complexity and Game Theory , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[10]  Chaitanya Swamy,et al.  Truthful and near-optimal mechanism design via linear programming , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).

[11]  Robert D. Carr,et al.  Randomized metarounding , 2002, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[12]  Michael L. Honig,et al.  Spectrum markets: motivation, challenges, and implications , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Magnús M. Halldórsson,et al.  Wireless capacity with oblivious power in general metrics , 2011, SODA '11.

[14]  Roger Wattenhofer,et al.  Wireless Communication Is in APX , 2009, ICALP.

[15]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Truthful randomized mechanisms for combinatorial auctions , 2012, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[16]  Roger Wattenhofer,et al.  Capacity of Arbitrary Wireless Networks , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[17]  Roger Wattenhofer,et al.  The Power of Non-Uniform Wireless Power , 2013, SODA.

[18]  Thomas Kesselheim Approximation Algorithms for Wireless Link Scheduling with Flexible Data Rates , 2012, ESA.

[19]  Zongpeng Li,et al.  Strategyproof auctions for balancing social welfare and fairness in secondary spectrum markets , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[20]  Zongpeng Li,et al.  Truthful spectrum auction design for secondary networks , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[21]  E. H. Clarke Multipart pricing of public goods , 1971 .

[22]  Roger Wattenhofer,et al.  The Complexity of Connectivity in Wireless Networks , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[23]  Theodore Groves,et al.  Incentives in Teams , 1973 .

[24]  Thomas Kesselheim,et al.  A constant-factor approximation for wireless capacity maximization with power control in the SINR model , 2010, SODA '11.

[25]  Xia Zhou,et al.  eBay in the Sky: strategy-proof wireless spectrum auctions , 2008, MobiCom '08.