Using System Dynamics for Grand Challenges: The ESDMA Approach

In this paper, we argue and show how system dynamics modelling can be combined with exploratory modelling and analysis in order to address grand societal challenges, which are almost without exception characterized by dynamic complexity and deep uncertainty. Addressing such issues requires the systematic exploration of different hypotheses related to model formulation and model parametrization and their effect on the kinds of behavioral dynamics that can occur. Through two cases, we illustrate the combination of system dynamics and exploratory modelling. The first case illustrates its use for discovering different types of dynamics related to metal and mineral scarcity. The second case illustrates its use for worst-case discovery in water scarcity. We conclude that exploratory system dynamics modelling represents a promising approach for addressing deeply uncertain dynamically complex societal challenges. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Jac A. M. Vennix,et al.  Group model-building: tackling messy problems , 1999 .

[2]  Antonio Valero,et al.  Physical geonomics: Combining the exergy and Hubbert peak analysis for predicting mineral resources depletion , 2010 .

[3]  Benjamin P. Bryant,et al.  Thinking Inside the Box , 2010 .

[4]  David C. Lane,et al.  Participative Modelling and Big Issues: Defining Features of System Dynamics? , 2010 .

[5]  B. Agusdinata,et al.  Exploratory modeling and analysis: a promising method to deal with deep uncertainty , 2008 .

[6]  Jan H. Kwakkel,et al.  Dynamic scenario discovery under deep uncertainty: The future of copper , 2013 .

[7]  Erik Pruyt,et al.  Scarcity of Minerals and Metals: A Generic Exploratory System Dynamics Model , 2010 .

[8]  Steven C Bankes,et al.  Tools and techniques for developing policies for complex and uncertain systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Eamonn J. Keogh,et al.  On the Need for Time Series Data Mining Benchmarks: A Survey and Empirical Demonstration , 2002, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[10]  P. Döll,et al.  Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability , 2003 .

[11]  S. Simonovic,et al.  Global water resources modeling with an integrated model of the social-economic-environmental system , 2011 .

[12]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Material availability and the supply chain: risks, effects, and responses. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  David C. Lane,et al.  Rerum cognoscere causas: Part I — How do the ideas of system dynamics relate to traditional social theories and the voluntarism/determinism debate? , 2001 .

[14]  Yaman Barlas,et al.  Automated parameter specification in dynamic feedback models based on behavior pattern features , 2011 .

[15]  S. Kanae,et al.  Global Hydrological Cycles and World Water Resources , 2006, Science.

[16]  David N. Ford,et al.  Mental models concepts for system dynamics research , 1998 .

[17]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[18]  R. Lempert,et al.  Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative Long-Term Policy Analysis , 2003 .

[19]  John H. Miller,et al.  Active Nonlinear Tests (Ants) of Complex Simulation Models , 1998 .

[20]  John D. Sterman Exploring the next great frontier: system dynamics at fifty , 2007 .

[21]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[22]  Jan H. Kwakkel,et al.  Adaptive Robust Design under deep uncertainty , 2013 .

[23]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[24]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Bump hunting in high-dimensional data , 1999, Stat. Comput..

[25]  Steve Bankes,et al.  Exploratory Modeling for Policy Analysis , 1993, Oper. Res..

[26]  Vincent Marchau,et al.  Classifying and communicating uncertainties in model-based policy analysis , 2010 .

[27]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[28]  David N. Ford,et al.  Mental models concepts revisited: some clarifications and a reply to Lane , 1999 .

[29]  David C. Lane,et al.  What Is a ‘Policy Insight’? , 2012 .

[30]  R. Ayres On the practical limits to substitution , 2007 .

[31]  Effie Amanatidou,et al.  Orienting European innovation systems towards grand challenges and the roles that FTA can play , 2012 .

[32]  Erling Moxnes Policy Sensitivity Analysis: simple versus complex fishery models , 2005 .

[33]  Petra Döll,et al.  Value of river discharge data for global-scale hydrological modeling , 2007 .

[34]  James E. Campbell,et al.  An Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Models: Part I—Introduction, Input Variable Selection and Preliminary Variable Assessment , 1981 .

[35]  John D. Sterman,et al.  All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist† , 2002 .

[36]  T. Warren Liao,et al.  Clustering of time series data - a survey , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[37]  David C. Lane,et al.  Should system dynamics be described as a ‘hard’ or ‘deterministic’ systems approach? , 2000 .

[38]  David Molden,et al.  Planetary boundaries: The devil is in the detail , 2009 .

[39]  Andrew Ford,et al.  Statistical screening of system dynamics models , 2005 .

[40]  David G. Groves,et al.  A New Analytic Method for Finding Policy-Relevant Scenarios: , 2007 .

[41]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  ANEMI: a new model for integrated assessment of global change , 2010 .

[42]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[43]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics , 2011 .

[44]  David C. Lane,et al.  Diagramming conventions in system dynamics , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[45]  Jay W. Forrester,et al.  System dynamics—a personal view of the first fifty years , 2007 .