Development of a health monitoring and diagnosis framework for fused deposition modeling process based on a machine learning algorithm

In this article, a data-driven approach is applied to develop a health monitoring and diagnosis framework for a fused deposition modeling process based on a machine learning algorithm. For the data-driven approach, three accelerometers, an acoustic emission sensor, and three thermocouples are installed, and associated data are collected from those sensors. The collected data are processed to obtain root mean square values, and they are used for constructing health monitoring and diagnosis models for the fused deposition modeling process based on a support vector machine algorithm, which is one of machine learning algorithms. Among various root mean square values, those of acceleration data from the frame were most effective for diagnosing health states of the fused deposition modeling process with the non-linear support vector machine–based model.

[1]  David He,et al.  A PHM Approach to Additive Manufacturing Equipment Health Monitoring, Fault Diagnosis, and Quality Control , 2014, Annual Conference of the PHM Society.

[2]  Kaufui Wong,et al.  A Review of Additive Manufacturing , 2012 .

[3]  pLuciano Fratocchip,et al.  Additive manufacturing technologies as a reshoring enabler , 2019 .

[4]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[5]  Y Zhang,et al.  A parametric study of part distortions in fused deposition modelling using three-dimensional finite element analysis , 2008 .

[6]  Vojislav Kecman,et al.  Support Vector Machines – An Introduction , 2005 .

[7]  R. K. Ohdar,et al.  Parametric appraisal of fused deposition modelling process using the grey Taguchi method , 2010 .

[8]  Y Zhang,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis simulations of the fused deposition modelling process , 2006 .

[9]  Hermann Seitz,et al.  A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies , 2012, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[10]  Hermann Seitz,et al.  Erratum to: A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies , 2013 .

[11]  C. Fortulan,et al.  Optimal deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling for maximizing the strength of three-dimensional printed truss-like structures , 2019 .

[12]  Chrisian A Griffiths,et al.  A design of experiments approach to optimise tensile and notched bending properties of fused deposition modelling parts , 2016 .

[13]  Tait D. McLouth,et al.  Influence of processing and orientation print effects on the mechanical and thermal behavior of 3D-Printed ULTEM® 9085 Material , 2017 .

[14]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[15]  Anirban Bhattacharya,et al.  Failure investigation of fused deposition modelling parts fabricated at different raster angles under tensile and flexural loading , 2017 .

[16]  Jia Liu,et al.  Sensor-Based Online Process Fault Detection in Additive Manufacturing , 2015 .

[17]  Yan Wang,et al.  A New Approach for Online Monitoring of Additive Manufacturing Based on Acoustic Emission , 2016 .

[18]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Selection of optimal part orientation in fused deposition modelling using swarm intelligence , 2007 .