A benchmark for D2D in cellular networks: The importance of information

Many new mobile applications create traffic among cellular users. We define intra-cellular traffic as the traffic from one cellular user to another user in the same cellular network. This type of traffic introduces new challenges for cellular network operators. Most work in the literature focuses on the possibility to utilize the direct links between those users, if they are close to each other (this is called device-to-device (D2D) communication), to by-pass the base station. However, implementing D2D is not easy, especially because detecting that a traffic is intracellular is difficult. In this paper, we assume that we know how to detect if a traffic is intra-cellular or not and focus on designing a type-aware scheduler (i.e., a scheduler which has the information on the type of traffic) in a case where direct communications between users is not enabled. This scheduler can be seen as the benchmark against the case where direct communications are allowed. We show that performance gain can be obtained by jointly scheduling the uplink and downlink with respect to the case where the scheduler is blind to the types. We show for a homogeneous network that when the traffic types are known to a scheduler, a significant performance gain (up to 28%) can be achieved compared to the case where the traffic types are not known. We also analyze heterogeneous networks that consist of macro cells and small cells and show that up to a 36% performance gain can be obtained by performing type-aware user association jointly with user scheduling.

[1]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Fair Scheduling Policies Exploiting Multiuser Diversity in Cellular Systems With Device-to-Device Communications , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Catherine Rosenberg,et al.  Energy and Throughput Trade-Offs in Cellular Networks Using Base Station Switching , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[3]  Catherine Rosenberg,et al.  Joint Resource Allocation and User Association for Heterogeneous Wireless Cellular Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Stefan Parkvall,et al.  Design aspects of network assisted device-to-device communications , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Michael L. Honig,et al.  Uplink distributed power and receiver optimization across multiple cells , 2012, 2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[6]  Sungyeon Kim,et al.  Joint Resource Allocation for Uplink and Downlink in Wireless Networks: A Case Study with User-Level Utility Functions , 2009, VTC Spring 2009 - IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[7]  András Rácz,et al.  On the Impact of Inter-Cell Interference in LTE , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[8]  Zukang Shen,et al.  Dynamic uplink-downlink configuration and interference management in TD-LTE , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Charging and rate control for elastic traffic , 1997, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[10]  Olav Tirkkonen,et al.  Resource Sharing Optimization for Device-to-Device Communication Underlaying Cellular Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Distributed Resource Allocation in Device-to-Device Enhanced Cellular Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[12]  Hans van den Berg,et al.  Scheduler-Dependent Inter-cell Interference and Its Impact on LTE Uplink Performance at Flow Level , 2011, WWIC.

[13]  Michael S. Berger,et al.  Cloud RAN for Mobile Networks—A Technology Overview , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[14]  Yongbin Wei,et al.  A survey on 3GPP heterogeneous networks , 2011, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[15]  Giuseppe Piro,et al.  Downlink Packet Scheduling in LTE Cellular Networks: Key Design Issues and a Survey , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.