Assessing the quality of digital elevation models obtained from mini unmanned aerial vehicles for overland flow modelling in urban areas

Abstract. Precise and detailed digital elevation models (DEMs) are essential to accurately predict overland flow in urban areas. Unfortunately, traditional sources of DEM, such as airplane light detection and ranging (lidar) DEMs and point and contour maps, remain a bottleneck for detailed and reliable overland flow models, because the resulting DEMs are too coarse to provide DEMs of sufficient detail to inform urban overland flows. Interestingly, technological developments of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) suggest that they have matured enough to be a competitive alternative to satellites or airplanes. However, this has not been tested so far. In this study we therefore evaluated whether DEMs generated from UAV imagery are suitable for urban drainage overland flow modelling. Specifically, 14 UAV flights were conducted to assess the influence of four different flight parameters on the quality of generated DEMs: (i) flight altitude, (ii) image overlapping, (iii) camera pitch, and (iv) weather conditions. In addition, we compared the best-quality UAV DEM to a conventional lidar-based DEM. To evaluate both the quality of the UAV DEMs and the comparison to lidar-based DEMs, we performed regression analysis on several qualitative and quantitative metrics, such as elevation accuracy, quality of object representation (e.g. buildings, walls and trees) in the DEM, which were specifically tailored to assess overland flow modelling performance, using the flight parameters as explanatory variables. Our results suggested that, first, as expected, flight altitude influenced the DEM quality most, where lower flights produce better DEMs; in a similar fashion, overcast weather conditions are preferable, but weather conditions and other factors influence DEM quality much less. Second, we found that for urban overland flow modelling, the UAV DEMs performed competitively in comparison to a traditional lidar-based DEM. An important advantage of using UAVs to generate DEMs in urban areas is their flexibility that enables more frequent, local, and affordable elevation data updates, allowing, for example, to capture different tree foliage conditions.

[1]  C. Strecha,et al.  The Accuracy of Automatic Photogrammetric Techniques on Ultra-light UAV Imagery , 2012 .

[2]  Karl Kraus.  Photogrammetrie, Bd 1: Geometrische Informationen aus Photographien und Laserscanneraufnahmen , 2004 .

[3]  S. M. Jong,et al.  An integrated spatial and spectral approach to the classification of Mediterranean land cover types: the SSC method , 2001 .

[4]  Dušan Prodanović,et al.  Overland flow and pathway analysis for modelling of urban pluvial flooding , 2009 .

[5]  Tomaz Podobnikar.  Methods for visual quality assessment of a digital terrain model , 2009 .

[6]  Z. Vojinovic,et al.  On the use of 1D and coupled 1D-2D modelling approaches for assessment of flood damage in urban areas , 2009 .

[7]  John Blanksby,et al.  Investigations into 1D-1D and 1D-2D Urban Flood Modelling , 2009 .

[8]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[9]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR MAPPING AND 3D MODELING - CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES - , 2012 .

[10]  Henri Eisenbeiss,et al.  UAVS FOR THE DOCUMENTATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS , 2010 .

[11]  S. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Trajectory Analysis of Pedestrian Crowd Movements at a Dutch Music Festival , 2014 .

[12]  P. Reinartz,et al.  Benchmarking and quality analysis of DEM generated from high and very high resolution optical stereo satellite data , 2010 .

[13]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning , 1999 .

[14]  Chunhua Zhang,et al.  The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review , 2012, Precision Agriculture.

[15]  I. Colomina,et al.  Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review , 2014 .

[16]  P. Bates,et al.  Benchmarking 2D hydraulic models for urban flooding , 2008 .

[17]  S. K. Jenson,et al.  Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information-system analysis , 1988 .

[18]  T. Pock,et al.  Point Clouds: Lidar versus 3D Vision , 2010 .

[19]  Livio Pinto,et al.  Experimental analysis of different software packages for orientation and digital surface modelling from UAV images , 2014, Earth Science Informatics.

[20]  Konrad Schindler,et al.  High-quality observation of surface imperviousness for urban runoff modelling using UAV imagery , 2015 .

[21]  Rui Portocarrero Sarmento,et al.  Introduction to Linear Regression , 2017 .

[22]  Elizabeth A. Peck,et al.  Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis , 2001 .

[23]  C. Sampson,et al.  Use of terrestrial laser scanning data to drive decimetric resolution urban inundation models , 2010 .

[24]  Dragan Savic,et al.  The urban inundation model with bidirectional flow interaction between 2D overland surface and 1D se , 2007 .

[25]  Daniel Zelterman.  Applied Linear Models with SAS: Introduction to Linear Regression , 2010 .

[26]  C. Sampson,et al.  Benchmarking urban flood models of varying complexity and scale using high resolution terrestrial LiDAR data , 2011 .

[27]  Heiko Apel,et al.  Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? , 2009 .

[28]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Development and Testing of Canada-Wide Interpolated Spatial Models of Daily Minimum–Maximum Temperature and Precipitation for 1961–2003 , 2008 .

[29]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[30]  J P Leitão,et al.  The influence of digital elevation model resolution on overland flow networks for modelling urban pluvial flooding. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[31]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Bundle Adjustment - A Modern Synthesis , 1999, Workshop on Vision Algorithms.