Enhanced simple beam theory for characterising mode-I fracture resistance via a double cantilever beam test

Abstract We study a double-cantilever beam (DCB), in which either the crack-mouth opening displacement or the end rotations are prescribed, in the linear-elastic-fracture-mechanics (LEFM) limit of an infinitely stiff and brittle interface. We present a novel, yet extremely simple, derivation of the closed-form solution of this problem when the arms are modelled with Timoshenko beam theory. We remove the assumption that the cross sections of the DCB arms are assumed not to rotate (i.e. that they are clamped) at the crack tip, which is made in so-called ‘simple beam theory’ (SBT). Therefore, with our ‘enhanced simple beam theory’ (ESBT), in front of the crack tip, cross sections are allowed to rotate, although the beam axis stays undeformed. Thus, we can determine the crack-tip rotation caused by the deformation of the beam in front of the crack tip also in the LEFM limit. As a result, most of the inaccuracies of the SBT are eliminated, without the need for a crack-length correction, used in the ‘corrected beam theory’ (CBT). In this way, we can derive a very accurate data reduction formula for the critical energy release rate, G c , which does not require the measurement of the crack length, unlike CBT. In our numerical results we show that, compared to the most effective data reduction methods currently available (including CBT), our formula is either as accurate or more accurate for the case of brittle delamination of thick composite plates, in which shear deformability can play a significant role.

[1]  T. Anderson,et al.  Fracture mechanics - Fundamentals and applications , 2017 .

[2]  Peter P. Gillis,et al.  Double‐Cantilever Cleavage Mode of Crack Propagation , 1964 .

[3]  P. W. Mast,et al.  Crack propagation studies in brittle materials , 1973 .

[4]  J. Rice A path-independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain , 1968 .

[5]  J. G. Williams,et al.  The use of a cohesive zone model to study the fracture of fibre composites and adhesively-bonded joints , 2003 .

[6]  Sheldon M. Wiederhorn,et al.  Critical Analysis of the Theory of the Double Cantilever Method of Measuring Fracture‐Surface Energies , 1968 .

[7]  V. Tamužs,et al.  Delamination properties of translaminar-reinforced composites , 2003 .

[8]  Gordan Jelenić,et al.  Mixed‐mode delamination in 2D layered beam finite elements , 2015 .

[9]  M. F. Kanninen,et al.  An augmented double cantilever beam model for studying crack propagation and arrest , 1973, International Journal of Fracture.

[10]  M.F.S.F. de Moura,et al.  Crack equivalent concept applied to the fracture characterization of bonded joints under pure mode I loading , 2008 .

[11]  G. Paulino,et al.  Analysis of Fracture in Aluminum Joints Bonded with a Bi-Component Epoxy Adhesive , 2011 .

[12]  A. Biel,et al.  Effects of constitutive parameters on the accuracy of measured fracture energy using the DCB-specimen , 2008 .

[13]  H. Corten,et al.  Fracture Mechanics: A Tool for Evaluating Structural Adhesives , 1971 .

[14]  Static and dynamic fracture mechanics analysis of a DCB specimen considering shear deformation effects , 2004 .

[15]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  The role of material orthotropy in fracture specimens for composites , 1992 .

[16]  R. Campilho,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the Double-Cantilever Beam and Tapered Double-Cantilever Beam tests for estimation of the tensile fracture toughness of adhesive joints , 2016 .

[17]  Anthony J. Kinloch,et al.  Measuring the mode I adhesive fracture energy, GIC, of structural adhesive joints: the results of an international round-robin , 2003 .

[18]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[19]  Gordan Jelenić,et al.  On Gc, Jc and the characterisation of the mode-I fracture resistance in delamination or adhesive debonding , 2018, International Journal of Solids and Structures.

[20]  B. Gross,et al.  Stress intensity factors for crackline-loaded edge-crack specimens. , 1967 .

[21]  Bent F. Sørensen,et al.  Controlled crack growth in ceramics: The DCB specimen loaded with pure moments , 1996 .

[22]  A. Biel,et al.  An analysis of the evaluation of the fracture energy using the DCB-specimen , 2007 .

[23]  J. Williams End corrections for orthotropic DCB specimens , 1989 .

[24]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  Orthotropy rescaling and implications for fracture in composites , 1991 .