Computational models of location-invariant orthographic processing

We trained three topologies of backpropagation neural networks to discriminate 2000 words (lexical representations) presented at different positions of a horizontal letter array. The first topology (zero-deck) contains no hidden layer, the second (one-deck) has a single hidden layer, and for the last topology (two-deck), the task is divided in two subtasks implemented as two stacked neural networks, with explicit word-centred letters as intermediate representations. All topologies successfully simulated two key benchmark phenomena observed in skilled human reading: transposed-letter priming and relative-position priming. However, the two-deck topology most accurately simulated the ability to discriminate words from nonwords, while containing the fewest connection weights. We analysed the internal representations after training. Zero-deck networks implement a letter-based scheme with a position bias to differentiate anagrams. One-deck networks implement a holographic overlap coding in which representations are essentially letter-based and words are linear combinations of letters. Two-deck networks also implement holographic-coding.

[1]  Clive Frankish,et al.  SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams , 2007 .

[2]  J. Grainger,et al.  COMPACT REPRESENTATIONS OF WORD LOCATION INDEPENDENCE IN CONNECTIONIST MODELS , 2008 .

[3]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  How to say "no" to a nonword: a leaky competing accumulator model of lexical decision. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  M. Sigman,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2022 .

[5]  Hervé Glotin,et al.  A developmental perspective on visual word recognition: New evidence and a self-organising model , 2010 .

[6]  V. Marchman Constraints on Plasticity in a Connectionist Model of the English Past Tense , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[9]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Parallel Networks that Learn to Pronounce English Text , 1987, Complex Syst..

[10]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Neural networks for word recognition: Is a hidden layer necessary? , 2010 .

[11]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus , 2002, Neuroreport.

[12]  C. Whitney How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  R. Catrambone,et al.  Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2010 .

[15]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, and symbols. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  J. Elman Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure , 1991, Machine Learning.

[17]  Philip Meier,et al.  Rat performance on visual detection task modeled with divisive normalization and adaptive decision thresholds. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[18]  Kristi A. Kiyonaga,et al.  The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. , 1993, Psychological science.

[19]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The impact of letter spacing on reading: a test of the bigram coding hypothesis. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[20]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Learning location-invariant orthographic representations for printed words , 2010, Connect. Sci..

[21]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[22]  Kevin Diependaele,et al.  Fast phonology and the Bimodal Interactive Activation Model , 2010 .

[23]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. , 2008, Psychological review.

[24]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .

[25]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[27]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[28]  James L. McClelland Explorations In Parallel Distributed Processing , 1988 .

[29]  J. Grainger,et al.  An Adaptive Resonance Theory account of the implicit learning of orthographic word forms , 2010, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[30]  J B Poline,et al.  Letter Binding and Invariant Recognition of Masked Words , 2004, Psychological science.

[31]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[32]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[33]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Watching the Word Go by: On the Time-course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[34]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  S. Lupker,et al.  Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read , 2012, Cognition.

[37]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[38]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. , 1990 .

[39]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  The Computational Exploration of Visual Word Recognition in a Split Model , 2001, Neural Computation.

[40]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Broken Symmetries in a Location-Invariant Word Recognition Network , 2011, Neural Computation.

[41]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System , 2007, Neuron.

[42]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Masked Orthographic and Phonological Priming in Visual Word Recognition and Naming: Cross-Task Comparisons , 1996 .

[43]  J Grainger,et al.  The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps , 2007, Neuron.

[45]  Colin J Davis,et al.  The spatial coding model of visual word identification. , 2010, Psychological review.

[46]  J. Grainger,et al.  Crowding affects letters and symbols differently. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction , 2008 .

[48]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.

[49]  G. Kane Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .

[50]  Yee Whye Teh,et al.  Unsupervised Discovery of Nonlinear Structure Using Contrastive Backpropagation , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  Geoffrey E. Hinton Connectionist Learning Procedures , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[52]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure , 2006, NeuroImage.