Procurement strategies for enhancing exploration and exploitation in construction projects

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate how procurement strategies may be designed to facilitate exploration and exploitation in construction projects. Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on a literature review of organizational research and construction management literature together with a brief interview study of Swedish clients and contractors. Findings The theoretical and empirical findings propose that small and simple projects with low uncertainty and scarce resources may focus on exploitation to enhance short-term efficiency through traditional procurement strategies including delivery systems that separate the actors and their activities (i.e. pure design-build- or design-bid-build-contracts), fixed price payment and price focus in bid evaluation. Large complex projects with high uncertainty and customization benefit from combining exploration and exploitation to enhance sustainable performance. This requires collaborative procurement strategies including joint specification through early contractor involvement, cost reimbursement coupled with incentive-based payment, bid evaluation based on multiple criteria and collaborative tools and activities in partnering arrangements. Research limitations/implications This paper contributes to organizational learning literature by pinpointing the need for integrating procurement strategies that enhance combination of exploration and exploitation. The main contribution to the construction management literature involves the investigation of how procurement strategies may affect exploration and exploitation, as identified and articulated in the propositions developed in this paper. Practical implications From a practical perspective, the findings highlight the importance of tailoring procurement strategies to project characteristics to enhance a suitable balance between exploration and exploitation in construction projects. Originality/value The explicit focus on the operational project-level is uncommon but relevant in organizational learning literature.

[1]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Partnering in engineering projects: Four dimensions of supply chain integration , 2015 .

[2]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Structural ambidexterity in NPD processes: A firm-level assessment of the impact of differentiated structures on innovation performance , 2010 .

[3]  Hans Andersson,et al.  Exploring and exploiting inventors at Westco: a case of ambidexterity in R&D , 2010 .

[4]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: Stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects , 2010 .

[5]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[6]  A. Davies,et al.  Procuring Complex Performance in Construction: London Heathrow Terminal 5 And a Private Finance Initiative Hospital , 2009 .

[7]  Olugbenga Jide Olaniran,et al.  The effects of cost-based contractor selection on construction project performance , 2015 .

[8]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Risk/Reward Compensation Model for Civil Engineering Infrastructure Alliance Projects , 2011 .

[9]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Exploration and exploitation in project-based organizations: Development and diffusion of knowledge at different organizational levels in construction companies , 2013 .

[10]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Effective partnering tools in construction: a case study on MTRC TKE contract 604 in Hong Kong , 2004 .

[11]  Steven Tadelis,et al.  Incentives Versus Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procurement Contracts , 2001 .

[12]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Graham Winch,et al.  Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction , 1998 .

[14]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[15]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Waste reduction through incentives: a case study , 2008 .

[16]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method , 2001 .

[17]  Bjørn Olsen,et al.  Governance of complex procurements in the oil and gas industry , 2005 .

[18]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  COMPETENCE DYNAMICS AND LEARNING PROCESSES IN PROJECT-BASED FIRMS: SHIFTING, ADAPTING AND LEVERAGING , 2008 .

[19]  Alan D. Russell,et al.  Assessing Infrastructure Project Innovation Potential as a Function of Procurement Mode , 2008 .

[20]  Thorbjørn Knudsen,et al.  Coordinated Exploration , 2014 .

[21]  J. Swart,et al.  Ambidexterity in projects: An intellectual capital perspective , 2015 .

[22]  Intan Rohani Endut,et al.  Factors contributing to project time and hence cost overrun in the Malaysian construction industry , 2014 .

[23]  A. Kadefors Trust in project relationships-inside the black box , 2004 .

[24]  Marek Korczynski THE LOW-TRUST ROUTE TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: INTER-FIRM RELATIONS IN THE UK ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN THE 1980S AND 1990S , 1996 .

[25]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  Learning capabilities in organizational networks: case studies of six construction projects , 2004 .

[26]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[27]  Sadi Assaf,et al.  Causes of delay in large construction projects , 2006 .

[28]  W. Hughes,et al.  Collaborative incentive contracts: stimulating competitive behaviour without competition , 2014 .

[29]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit , 2011 .

[30]  P. Eriksson Partnering: what is it, when should it be used, and how should it be implemented? , 2010 .

[31]  G. D. Holt,et al.  Project delays and cost: stakeholder perceptions of traditional v. PPP procurement , 2012 .

[32]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[33]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[34]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership , 2008 .

[35]  FOR THE LACK OF A BOILERPLATE : TIPS ON WRITING UP ( AND REVIEWING ) , 2009 .

[36]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Evaluating guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracting strategies in Hong Kong construction industry , 2007 .

[37]  A. Roth,et al.  The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance , 2010 .

[38]  Dirk De Clercq,et al.  Shedding new light on the relationship between contextual ambidexterity and firm performance: An investigation of internal contingencies , 2013 .

[39]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[40]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[41]  Tuomas Ahola,et al.  Purchasing strategies and value creation in industrial turnkey projects , 2008 .

[42]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  Contractor selection using multi criteria utility theory: an additive mode , 1998 .

[43]  Thomas Olofsson,et al.  Credibility and applicability of virtual reality models in design and construction , 2008, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[44]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[45]  Chris Ivory,et al.  Partnering in major contracts: Paradox and metaphor , 2007 .

[46]  Hong Yan,et al.  A model for evaluating the applicability of partnering in construction , 2007 .

[47]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[48]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[49]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[50]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Procurement Effects on Coopetition in Client-Contractor Relationships , 2008 .

[51]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[52]  Anna Kadefors,et al.  Fairness in interorganizational project relations: norms and strategies , 2005 .

[53]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Potential for Implementing Relational Contracting and Joint Risk Management , 2004 .

[54]  Petra M. Bosch-Sijtsema,et al.  Cooperative Innovation Projects: Capabilities and Governance Mechanisms* , 2009 .

[55]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Selecting sustainable teams for PPP projects , 2008 .

[56]  Malena Ingemansson,et al.  The Logic of Innovation in Construction , 2014 .

[57]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[58]  H. Volberda,et al.  Exploring Exploration Orientation and its Determinants: Some Empirical Evidence , 2004 .

[59]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[60]  Ulrika Badenfelt,et al.  The selection of sharing ratios in target cost contracts , 2008 .

[61]  Johannes I.M. Halman,et al.  Innovation and interorganizational cooperation: a synthesis of literature , 2009 .

[62]  William Swan,et al.  Mutual objective setting for partnering projects in the public sector , 2007 .

[63]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Effects of cooperative procurement procedures on construction project performance: A conceptual framework , 2011 .

[64]  Zeki Simsek Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding , 2009 .

[65]  A. Tiwana Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity , 2008 .

[66]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  Ambidexterity and Knowledge Strategy in Major Projects: A Framework and Illustrative Case Study , 2014 .

[67]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  Managing Innovation Paradoxes: Ambidexterity Lessons from Leading Product Design Companies , 2010 .

[68]  Mattias Jacobsson,et al.  Towards a shift in mindset: partnering projects as engagement platforms , 2014 .