Computational reprogramming of homing endonuclease specificity at multiple adjacent base pairs

Site-specific homing endonucleases are capable of inducing gene conversion via homologous recombination. Reprogramming their cleavage specificities allows the targeting of specific biological sites for gene correction or conversion. We used computational protein design to alter the cleavage specificity of I-MsoI for three contiguous base pair substitutions, resulting in an endonuclease whose activity and specificity for its new site rival that of wild-type I-MsoI for the original site. Concerted design for all simultaneous substitutions was more successful than a modular approach against individual substitutions, highlighting the importance of context-dependent redesign and optimization of protein–DNA interactions. We then used computational design based on the crystal structure of the designed complex, which revealed significant unanticipated shifts in DNA conformation, to create an endonuclease that specifically cleaves a site with four contiguous base pair substitutions. Our results demonstrate that specificity switches for multiple concerted base pair substitutions can be computationally designed, and that iteration between design and structure determination provides a route to large scale reprogramming of specificity.

[1]  Adrian A Canutescu,et al.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[2]  David Baker,et al.  Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Phenix: Building New Software for Automated Crystallographic Structure Determination Biological Crystallography Phenix: Building New Software for Automated Crystallographic Structure Determination , 2022 .

[4]  M. Kimmel,et al.  Conflict of interest statement. None declared. , 2010 .

[5]  F. Studier,et al.  Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. , 2005, Protein expression and purification.

[6]  D. Baker,et al.  A simple physical model for the prediction and design of protein-DNA interactions. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Summer B. Thyme,et al.  Exploitation of binding energy for catalysis and design , 2009, Nature.

[8]  P. Duchateau,et al.  A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  Maider Villate,et al.  Efficient targeting of a SCID gene by an engineered single-chain homing endonuclease , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[11]  P. Harbury,et al.  Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[12]  Jay Painter,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Optimal Description of a Protein Structure in Terms of Multiple Groups Undergoing Tls Motion Biological Crystallography Optimal Description of a Protein Structure in Terms of Multiple Groups Undergoing Tls Motion , 2005 .

[13]  L Alexander Lyznik,et al.  Heritable targeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease. , 2010, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[14]  M. Belfort,et al.  Mechanisms of Intron Mobility (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  Monique Turmel,et al.  Flexible DNA target site recognition by divergent homing endonuclease isoschizomers I-CreI and I-MsoI. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  Andreu Alibés,et al.  Molecular basis of xeroderma pigmentosum group C DNA recognition by engineered meganucleases , 2008, Nature.

[17]  P. Duchateau,et al.  Engineering of large numbers of highly specific homing endonucleases that induce recombination on novel DNA targets. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Zhilei Chen,et al.  Directed evolution of homing endonuclease I-SceI with altered sequence specificity. , 2009, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[19]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational redesign of endonuclease DNA binding and cleavage specificity , 2006, Nature.

[20]  Samuel Selvaraj,et al.  Intermolecular and intramolecular readout mechanisms in protein-DNA recognition. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  B. Stoddard Homing endonuclease structure and function , 2005, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[22]  D. Hoover,et al.  DNAWorks: an automated method for designing oligonucleotides for PCR-based gene synthesis. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  C. Pace,et al.  How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[24]  David Baker,et al.  Assessment of the optimization of affinity and specificity at protein–DNA interfaces , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  David R. Liu,et al.  Directed evolution and substrate specificity profile of homing endonuclease I-SceI. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[26]  P. Duchateau,et al.  Engineered I-CreI derivatives cleaving sequences from the human XPC gene can induce highly efficient gene correction in mammalian cells. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  Barry L. Stoddard,et al.  Generation of single-chain LAGLIDADG homing endonucleases from native homodimeric precursor proteins , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  F. Jaisser,et al.  I-SceI-Induced Gene Replacement at a Natural Locus in Embryonic Stem Cells , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[29]  B. Stoddard,et al.  Isolation and characterization of new homing endonuclease specificities at individual target site positions. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.