Differentiating for Diversity: Using Universal Design for Learning in Elementary Computer Science Education

As computer science moves from an outreach activity to a normal classroom activity in the multi-subject, mainstream elementary school classroom, curricula need to be examined to ensure they are meeting the needs of diverse students. In this paper, we present how Universal Design for Learning (UDL) was used to develop and refine a programming environment and curriculum for upper-elementary school classrooms (students aged 9-12). We then present our accommodations and modifications to emphasize the ways our development environment and/or curriculum enabled such uses. Ensuring introductory computer science experiences are equitable and accessible for a wide range of student learners may broaden the diversity of individuals who perceive themselves as capable of pursuing computer science in the future.

[1]  Michael Agar.  Border lessons: Linguistic “rich points” and evaluative understanding , 2000 .

[2]  Diana Franklin,et al.  Floors and Flexibility: Designing a Programming Environment for 4th-6th Grade Classrooms , 2015, SIGCSE.

[3]  Christine Alvarado.  CS Ed Week 2013: the hour of code , 2014, SGCS.

[4]  A. Osborne,et al.  The IDEA's Least Restrictive Environment Mandate: Legal Implications , 1994 .

[5]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[6]  Eric Rosenbaum,et al.  Scratch: programming for all , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[7]  Tonya R. Moon,et al.  Differentiating Instruction in Response to Student Readiness, Interest, and Learning Profile in Academically Diverse Classrooms: A Review of Literature , 2003 .

[8]  Barbara Ericson,et al.  Introduction to Computing and Programming in Python - a Multimedia Approach, 4th Edition , 2016 .

[9]  Gloria J. Ladson-Billings,et al.  Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy , 1995 .

[10]  Feng Wang,et al.  Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments , 2005 .

[11]  William G. Sparks.  Culturally Responsive Pedagogy , 1994 .

[12]  황윤한.  개별화 수업(Differentiated Instruction)의 본질에 관한 탐구 , 2004 .

[13]  Shirley Brice Heath,et al.  What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school , 1982, Language in Society.

[14]  Lorri J. Santamaría.  Culturally Responsive Differentiated Instruction: Narrowing Gaps between Best Pedagogical Practices Benefiting All Learners , 2009, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[15]  Feng Xia,et al.  Introduction to , 2015, ACM Trans. Multim. Comput. Commun. Appl..

[16]  Peggy King-Sears.  Introduction to Learning Disability Quarterly Special Series on Universal Design for Learning , 2014 .

[17]  Luis C. Moll,et al.  Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms , 1992 .

[18]  C. Fosnot.  Constructivism: a psychological theory of learning , 1996 .

[19]  K. Squire,et al.  Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground , 2004 .

[20]  Lorna Idol,et al.  Toward Inclusion of Special Education Students in General Education , 1998 .