Dynamic modeling and trajectory measurement on vibratory finishing

Vibratory finishing has been widely used in advanced manufacturing industry, such as aerospace, wind power equipment, and hydraulic equipment. Although the mechanism of vibratory surface finishing has been studied for decades, the fundamental issues of vibratory finishing such as the trajectories of media and workpiece during finishing are still not solved. In this study, a four-degree-of-freedom dynamic model is developed to analyze the dynamic responses of the vibratory finisher and validated by experimental tests. Coupled RecurDyn and EDEM technique is employed to simulate the trajectories of media and workpiece in a vibratory finisher. The simulation results are validated by X-ray experimental tests. Both the simulation and X-ray images show that the global trajectories of media and workpiece are a combination of three motions, circumferential motion around the center axis of the vibrating barrel, the radial elliptical motion around the center of rotation, and the self-flip movement. The trajectories of media exhibit an annular helix motion in the vibratory barrel in general. The shape, density, and weight of a workpiece and media have a significant effect on their global trajectory and local movements. The mechanism of vibratory surface finishing is better understood, which has great importance to the improvement of existing surface finishing processing technology and development of the next generation of vibratory mass finishing.

[1]  Klaus Affeld,et al.  X-ray-based assessment of the three-dimensional velocity of the liquid phase in a bubble column , 2001 .

[2]  Jan K. Spelt,et al.  Experimental investigation of vibratory finishing of aluminum , 2000 .

[3]  Sang Joon Lee,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of size and velocity of microbubbles moving in an opaque tube using an X-ray particle tracking velocimetry technique , 2005 .

[4]  Zhaowei Zhong,et al.  Kinematic analysis and experimental investigation on vibratory finishing , 2016 .

[5]  Kunal Ahluwalia,et al.  State-of-the-art on vibratory finishing in the aviation industry: an industrial and academic perspective , 2016 .

[6]  A. Sofronas,et al.  Model development and optimization of vibratory finishing process , 1979 .

[7]  Brigid Mullany,et al.  Application of particle image velocimetry (PIV) to vibrational finishing , 2016 .

[8]  Fukuo Hashimoto,et al.  Discrete element modeling of 3D media motion in vibratory finishing process , 2017 .

[9]  Fukuo Hashimoto,et al.  Modeling of vibratory finishing machines , 2015 .

[10]  Jan K. Spelt,et al.  Impact velocity measurement of media in a vibratory finisher , 2007 .

[11]  Brigid Mullany,et al.  The application of computational fluid dynamics to vibratory finishing processes , 2017 .

[12]  Jan K. Spelt,et al.  Contact forces and mechanisms in a vibratory finisher , 2002 .

[13]  Fukuo Hashimoto,et al.  Modeling of material removal mechanism in vibratory finishing process , 2016 .

[14]  S. Yang,et al.  Vibratory finishing co-simulation based on ADAMS-EDEM with experimental validation , 2018 .

[15]  Jan K. Spelt,et al.  Development of a laser displacement probe to measure particle impact velocities in vibrationally fluidized granular flows , 2013 .

[16]  Hiroto Habu,et al.  X‐Ray Visualization Measurement of Slurry Flow in Solid Propellant Casting , 2007 .

[17]  T. Heindel,et al.  Qualitative Observations of Dense Particle Motion in a Vibration-Excited Granular Bed , 2007 .

[18]  T. Heindel,et al.  X-Ray Particle Tracking Velocimetry in Fluidized Beds , 2009 .