On the validity of the independent pixel approximation for boundary layer clouds observed during ASTEX

The two-dimensional radiative transfer behavior of nine marine stratocumulus clouds observed by cloud radar during the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment is examined. The cloud radar resolves the vertical structure to 37.5 m. The method of [Frisch et al., 1995] is used to convert radar reflectivities to extinction fields. Three constructions of the same cloud field help elucidate underlying causes of variability: one is fully two-dimensional, while the other two have vertically uniform extinction fields but possess either a flat cloud top or the original cloud top topography. Two-dimensional solar radiative transfer results are compared with the independent pixel approximation (IPA) result. At the scale of the domain (≈ 7km) the IPA albedo bias is small, even after including vertical structure. Locally, in contrast, the direct solar beam interaction with cloud top geometry competes with radiative smoothing as the dominant radiative process. Power spectral analysis of nadir reflectances is dominated by radiative smoothing for overhead Sun, and side illumination/shadowing of cloud top bumps for low Sun. A method that incorporates direct beam interactions with the cloud geometry, in addition to radiative smoothing, significantly improves correlations of a smoothed IPA radiance field with the 2-D reflectances. In a remote sensing application, optical depth and albedo retrieval biases from plane-parallel theory depend on the spatial scale chosen to emulate a satellite pixel size. For scales less than a few kilometers and with low Sun, cloud top topography can cause large positive optical depth biases even when averaged over the entire domain. A larger spatial scales the negative IPA bias always dominates. Domain-averaged monochromatic albedo retrieval errors remain below 0.005, a relative error of less then 1%.

[1]  C. H. Whitlock,et al.  Absorption of Solar Radiation by Clouds: Observations Versus Models , 1995, Science.

[2]  Harshvardhan,et al.  Earth radiation budget and cloudiness simulations with a general circulation model , 1989 .

[3]  C. Fairall,et al.  Measurement of Stratus Cloud and Drizzle Parameters in ASTEX with a K , 1995 .

[4]  P. Gabriel,et al.  Simple Radiative Transfer Methods for Calculating Domain-Averaged Solar Fluxes in Inhomogeneous Clouds. , 1996 .

[5]  Teruyuki Nakajima,et al.  Algorithms for radiative intensity calculations in moderately thick atmospheres using a truncation approximation , 1988 .

[6]  Ed R. Westwater,et al.  A Steerable Dual-Channel Microwave Radiometer for Measurement of Water Vapor and Liquid in the Troposphere , 1983 .

[7]  D. Imre,et al.  Quantifying Cloud-Induced Shortwave Absorption: An Examination of Uncertainties and of Recent Arguments for Large Excess Absorption , 1996 .

[8]  Bruce A. Wielicki,et al.  Accuracy of the independent pixel approximation for satellite estimates of oceanic boundary layer cloud optical depth , 1997 .

[9]  Norman G. Loeb,et al.  Inference of Marine Stratus Cloud Optical Depths from Satellite Measurements: Does 1D Theory Apply? , 1998 .

[10]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  The albedo of fractal stratocumulus clouds , 1994 .

[11]  S. Matrosov,et al.  Cloud physics studies with 8 mm wavelength radar , 1995 .

[12]  H. Barker A parameterization for computing grid-averaged solar fluxes for inhomogeneous marine boundary layer , 1996 .

[13]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Independent Pixel and Monte Carlo Estimates of Stratocumulus Albedo , 1994 .

[14]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Liquid water path and plane-parallel albedo bias during ASTEX , 1995 .

[15]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Precipitation in Stratocumulus Clouds: Observational and Modeling Results. , 1995 .

[16]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  The Landsat Scale Break in Stratocumulus as a Three-Dimensional Radiative Transfer Effect: Implications for Cloud Remote Sensing , 1997 .

[17]  Anthony B. Davis,et al.  Radiative smoothing in fractal clouds , 1995 .

[18]  R. M. Welch,et al.  Stratocumulus Cloud Field Reflected Fluxes: The Effect of Cloud Shape , 1984 .

[19]  B. Albrecht,et al.  Marine boundary layer structure and fractional cloudiness , 1995 .

[20]  T. McKee,et al.  Scattering of Visible Radiation by Finite Clouds , 1974 .

[21]  David M. Winker,et al.  Influence of Subpixel-Scale Cloud-Top Structure on Reflectances from Overcast Stratiform Cloud Layers , 1998 .

[22]  Takahisa Kobayashi,et al.  Effects Due to Cloud Geometry on Biases in the Albedo Derived from Radiance Measurements. , 1993 .

[23]  C. Bretherton,et al.  The Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment - ASTEX , 1995 .

[24]  Bruce A. Wielicki,et al.  On the determination of cloud cover from satellite sensors: The effect of sensor spatial resolution , 1992 .

[25]  Roger Davies,et al.  Effect of cloud inhomogeneities on the solar zenith angle dependence of nadir reflectance , 1997 .

[26]  Anthony B. Davis,et al.  Nonlocal independent pixel approximation: direct and inverse problems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[27]  B. Wielicki,et al.  Independent Pixel and Two Dimensional Estimates of LANDSAT-Derived Cloud Field Albedo , 1997 .

[28]  William B. Rossow,et al.  Measuring cloud properties from space: a review , 1989 .

[29]  J. Morcrette,et al.  Broadband solar fluxes and heating rates for atmospheres with 3D broken clouds , 1998 .

[30]  Computation of the Effects of Inhomogeneous Clouds on Retrieval of Remotely Sensed Properties , 1998 .

[31]  H. Barker Estimating Cloud Field Albedo Using One-Dimensional Series Of Optical Depth , 1996 .

[32]  K. Evans The Spherical Harmonics Discrete Ordinate Method for Three-Dimensional Atmospheric Radiative Transfer , 1998 .