Various Structural Approaches to Analyze an Aircraft with High Aspect Ratio Wings

Aeroelastic analysis of an aircraft with a high aspect ratio wing for medium altitude and long endurance capability was attempted in this paper. In order to achieve such an objective, various structural models were adopted. The traditional approach has been based on a one-dimensional Euler-Bernoulli beam model. The structural analysis results of the present beam model were compared with those by the three-dimensional NASTRAN finite element model. In it, a taper ratio of 0.5 was applied; it was comprised of 21 ribs and 3 spars, and included two control surfaces. The relevant unsteady aerodynamic forces were obtained by using ZAERO, which is based on the doublet lattice method that considers flow compressibility. To obtain the unsteady aerodynamic force, the structural mode shapes and natural frequencies were transferred to ZAERO. Two types of unsteady aerodynamic forces were considered. The first was the unsteady aerodynamic forces which were based on the onedimensional beam shape; the other was based on the three-dimensional FEM model shape. These two types of aerodynamic forces were compared, and applied to the foregoing flutter analysis. The ultimate goal of the present research is to analyze the possible interaction between the rigid-body degrees of freedom and the aeroelastic modes. This will be achieved after the development of a reliable nonlinear beam formulation that would validate the current results as well as enable a thorough investigation of the nonlinearity. Moreover, such analysis will allow for an examination of the above-mentioned interaction between the flight dynamics and aeroelastic modes with the inclusion of the rigid body degrees of freedom.

[1]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Dynamic Response of Highly Flexible Flying Wings , 2011 .

[2]  D. Peters Two-dimensional incompressible unsteady airfoil theory—An overview , 2008 .

[3]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  Flight Dynamics of Highly Flexible Aircraft , 2008 .

[4]  Taehyoun Kim,et al.  Development and Verification of an Aircraft Flutter Analysis with Uncertainty , 2007 .

[5]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Static Nonlinear Aeroelasticity of Flexible Slender Wings in Compressible Flow , 2005 .

[6]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Nonlinear Flight Dynamics of Very Flexible Aircraft , 2005 .

[7]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  On the importance of aerodynamic and structural geometrical nonlinearities in aeroelastic behavior of high-aspect-ratio wings $ , 2004 .

[8]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Active twist rotor blade modelling using particle-wake aerodynamics and geometrically exact beam structural dynamics , 2004 .

[9]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Effects of geometric structural nonlinearity on flutter and limit cycle oscillations of high-aspect-ratio wings , 2004 .

[10]  Eli Livne,et al.  Future of Airplane Aeroelasticity , 2003 .

[11]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Limit-cycle oscillations in high-aspect-ratio wings , 2002 .

[12]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Modeling of High Aspect Ratio Active Flexible Wings for Roll Control , 2002 .

[13]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  On the modeling of integrally actuated helicopter blades , 2001 .

[14]  Sergio Preidikman,et al.  Time-Domain Simulations of Linear and Nonlinear Aeroelastic Behavior , 2000 .

[15]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Renaissance of Aeroelasticity and Its Future , 1999 .

[16]  B.H.K. Lee,et al.  ANALYSIS AND COMPUTATION OF NONLINEAR DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF A TWO-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM SYSTEM AND ITS APPLICATION IN AEROELASTICITY , 1997 .

[17]  D. Peters,et al.  Finite state induced flow models. I - Two-dimensional thin airfoil , 1995 .

[18]  Stuart J. Price,et al.  THE AEROELASTIC RESPONSE OF A TWO-DIMENSIONAL AIRFOIL WITH BILINEAR AND CUBIC STRUCTURAL NONLINEARITIES , 1994 .

[19]  Thomas W. Strganac,et al.  Numerical model of unsteady subsonic aeroelastic behavior , 1990 .

[20]  A. Von Flotow,et al.  Aeroelastic stability and control of a highly flexible aircraft , 1989 .

[21]  B.H.K. Lee,et al.  Flutter analysis of a two-dimensional airfoil containing structural nonlinearities , 1987 .

[22]  B.H.K. Lee,et al.  Flutter analysis of a two-dimensional airfoil with cubic non-linear restoring force , 1986 .

[23]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Nonlinear equations of motion for the elastic bending and torsion of twisted nonuniform rotor blades , 1974 .

[24]  J. P. Giesing,et al.  Subsonic Unsteady Aerodynamics for General Configurations. Part 1. Volume I. Direct Application of the Nonplanar Doublet-Lattice Method , 1971 .

[25]  W. Rodden,et al.  A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows. , 1969 .

[26]  T. Theodorsen General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter , 1934 .

[27]  Weihua Su,et al.  Coupled nonlinear aeroelasticity and flight dynamics of fully flexible aircraft , 2008 .

[28]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Study on Aeroelastic Response of High-Aspect-Ratio Wings , 2001 .

[29]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Nonlinear Aeroelasticity and Flight Dynamics of High-Altitude Long-Endurance Aircraft , 2001 .

[30]  Sergio Preidikman,et al.  Novel Strategy for Suppressing the Flutter Oscillations of Aircraft Wings , 2001 .

[31]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Nonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis of Complete Aircraft in Subsonic Flow , 2000 .

[32]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  VABS: A New Concept for Composite Rotor Blade Cross-Sectional Modeling , 1995 .

[33]  Mark James Johnson,et al.  Finite-State Airloads for Deformable Airfoils on Fixed and Rotating Wings , 1994 .

[34]  S. Shen An Approximate Analysis of Nonlinear Flutter Problems , 1959 .

[35]  Yuan-Cheng Fung,et al.  An introduction to the theory of aeroelasticity , 1955 .

[36]  Rufus Isaacs,et al.  Airfoil Theory for Flows of Variable Velocity , 1945 .