Cutting-edge computational chemical exposure research at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

[1]  Juan C. Rocha,et al.  Safe and just Earth system boundaries , 2023, Nature.

[2]  Jill A. Franzosa,et al.  Screening for drinking water contaminants of concern using an automated exposure-focused workflow , 2023, Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology.

[3]  Jeffrey M. Minucci,et al.  A Data-Driven Approach to Estimating Occupational Inhalation Exposure Using Workplace Compliance Data , 2023, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Laura N. Vandenberg,et al.  Addressing systemic problems with exposure assessments to protect the public’s health , 2023, Environmental Health.

[5]  Laura N. Vandenberg,et al.  A science-based agenda for health-protective chemical assessments and decisions: overview and consensus statement , 2023, Environmental Health.

[6]  J. Wambaugh,et al.  Characterizing surface water concentrations of hundreds of organic chemicals in United States for environmental risk prioritization , 2022, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.

[7]  Jamie R. Nuñez,et al.  Exploring chemical space in non-targeted analysis: a proposed ChemSpace tool , 2022, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[8]  Mark A. Sfeir,et al.  Simulating toxicokinetic variability to identify susceptible and highly exposed populations. , 2022, Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology.

[9]  G. Wodtke,et al.  Concentrated poverty, ambient air pollution, and child cognitive development , 2022, Science advances.

[10]  D. Vallero,et al.  Exposure Prioritization (Ex Priori): A Screening-Level High-Throughput Chemical Prioritization Tool , 2022, Toxics.

[11]  A. van Nieuwenhuyse,et al.  The European exposure science strategy 2020-2030. , 2022, Environment international.

[12]  W. Casey,et al.  A framework for establishing scientific confidence in new approach methodologies , 2022, Archives of Toxicology.

[13]  M. Salter,et al.  Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) , 2022, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Seth R. Newton,et al.  Approaches for assessing performance of high-resolution mass spectrometry–based non-targeted analysis methods , 2022, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[15]  Kevin A Hobbie,et al.  A harmonized chemical monitoring database for support of exposure assessments , 2022, Scientific Data.

[16]  Jeffrey M. Minucci,et al.  Uncertainty estimation strategies for quantitative non-targeted analysis , 2022, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[17]  Nancy C. Baker,et al.  Development of a Flame Retardant and an Organohalogen Flame Retardant Chemical Inventory , 2022, Scientific data.

[18]  K. Dionisio,et al.  Environmental Mixtures and Breast Cancer: Identifying Co-Exposure Patterns between Understudied vs Breast Cancer-Associated Chemicals using Chemical Inventory Informatics , 2022, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.

[19]  Jeffrey M. Minucci,et al.  Integrative exposomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic analyses of human placental samples links understudied chemicals to preeclampsia. , 2022, Environment international.

[20]  B. Hubbell,et al.  A value of information framework for assessing the trade‐offs associated with uncertainty, duration, and cost of chemical toxicity testing , 2022, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  A. Williams,et al.  Curation of a list of chemicals in biosolids from EPA National Sewage Sludge Surveys & Biennial Review Reports , 2022, Scientific data.

[22]  Linda G T Gaines,et al.  Assembly and Curation of Lists of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) to Support Environmental Science Research , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[23]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities , 2022, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Ksenia J. Groh,et al.  Anthropogenic Chemicals As Underestimated Drivers of Biodiversity Loss: Scientific and Societal Implications. , 2022, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  J. Sobus,et al.  Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization , 2021, Environment international.

[26]  F. Wania,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Holistic and Mechanistic Modeling Framework for Chemical Emissions, Fate, Exposure, and Risk , 2021, Environmental health perspectives.

[27]  Seth R. Newton,et al.  An Introduction to the Benchmarking and Publications for Non-Targeted Analysis Working Group. , 2021, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  M. Mumtaz,et al.  Advances in Assessing Hazard and Risk to Emerging Threats and Emergency Response: Comparing and Contrasting Efforts of Three Federal Agencies. , 2021, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[29]  Kevin A Pollard,et al.  Enhancing the use of exposure science across EU chemical policies as part of the European Exposure Science Strategy 2020–2030 , 2021, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.

[30]  J. Onnela,et al.  A systematic review of smartphone-based human activity recognition methods for health research , 2021, npj Digital Medicine.

[31]  Charles N. Lowe,et al.  Predicting compound amenability with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to improve non-targeted analysis , 2021, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[32]  B. Warth,et al.  Nontargeted Analysis Study Reporting Tool: A Framework to Improve Research Transparency and Reproducibility. , 2021, Analytical chemistry.

[33]  Seth R. Newton,et al.  A Framework for Utilizing High‐Resolution Mass Spectrometry and Nontargeted Analysis in Rapid Response and Emergency Situations , 2021, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[34]  Emma L. Schymanski,et al.  Development and Application of Liquid Chromatographic Retention Time Indices in HRMS-Based Suspect and Nontarget Screening. , 2021, Analytical chemistry.

[35]  Katherine A. Phillips,et al.  Chemical Characterization of Recycled Consumer Products Using Suspect Screening Analysis. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Vlad Isakov,et al.  Integrating Personal Air Sensor and GPS to Determine Microenvironment-Specific Exposures to Volatile Organic Compounds , 2021, Sensors.

[37]  Scott J. Miller,et al.  Green Chemistry: A Framework for a Sustainable Future. , 2021, Organic letters.

[38]  J. Wambaugh,et al.  High-throughput PBTK models for in vitro to in vivo extrapolation , 2021, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[39]  John A. Bowden,et al.  FluoroMatch 2.0—making automated and comprehensive non-targeted PFAS annotation a reality , 2021, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[40]  R. Naidu,et al.  Chemical pollution: A growing peril and potential catastrophic risk to humanity. , 2021, Environment international.

[41]  J. Wambaugh,et al.  Bayesian inference of chemical exposures from NHANES urine biomonitoring data , 2021, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.

[42]  T. Rocha-Santos,et al.  A One Health perspective of the impacts of microplastics on animal, human and environmental health. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  P. Anastas,et al.  Moving from Protection to Prosperity: Evolving the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for the next 50 years. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[44]  Charles N. Lowe,et al.  Enabling High-Throughput Searches for Multiple Chemical Data Using the U.S.-EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard , 2021, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[45]  Rogelio Tornero-Velez,et al.  Data Mining Approaches for Assessing Chemical Coexposures Using Consumer Product Purchase Data , 2020, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[46]  Zeqin Guo,et al.  Recent advances in non-targeted screening analysis using liquid chromatography - high resolution mass spectrometry to explore new biomarkers for human exposure. , 2020, Talanta.

[47]  O. Jolliet,et al.  High Throughput Risk and Impact Screening of Chemicals in Consumer Products , 2020, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[48]  T. Buckley,et al.  Sensor technology: a critical cutting edge of exposure science , 2020, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.

[49]  Nicolle S. Tulve,et al.  A quest to identify suitable organic tracers for estimating children’s dust ingestion rates , 2020, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.

[50]  Robert G. Pearce,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a High Throughput Inhalation Model for Organic Chemicals , 2020, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.

[51]  Haile K. Tadesse,et al.  Nontargeted mass-spectral detection of chloroperfluoropolyether carboxylates in New Jersey soils , 2020, Science.

[52]  Antony J Williams,et al.  Revisiting Five Years of CASMI Contests with EPA Identification Tools , 2020, Metabolites.

[53]  A. Massarotti,et al.  Essential Medicinal Chemistry of Essential Medicines , 2020, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[54]  Christopher M. Grulke,et al.  Database of pharmacokinetic time-series data and parameters for 144 environmental chemicals , 2020, Scientific Data.

[55]  N. Sunger,et al.  High-Throughput Exposure Assessment Tool (HEAT) for exposure-based prioritization of chemicals , 2020, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal.

[56]  Daniel Vallero,et al.  Enhancing life cycle chemical exposure assessment through ontology modeling. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[57]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Trends in tap and bottled water consumption among children and adults in the United States: analyses of NHANES 2011–16 data , 2020, Nutrition Journal.

[58]  D. Muir,et al.  Toward a Global Understanding of Chemical Pollution: A First Comprehensive Analysis of National and Regional Chemical Inventories. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[59]  E. Benfenati,et al.  21st Century Approaches for Evaluating Exposures, biological activity, and risks of complex substances: Workshop highlights. , 2020, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[60]  Antony J. Williams,et al.  EPA’s DSSTox database: History of development of a curated chemistry resource supporting computational toxicology research , 2019, Computational toxicology.

[61]  Muhammad Azher Hassan,et al.  A spatio-temporally weighted hybrid model to improve estimates of personal PM2.5 exposure: Incorporating big data from multiple data sources. , 2019, Environmental pollution.

[62]  Antony J. Williams,et al.  Open-source QSAR models for pKa prediction using multiple machine learning approaches , 2019, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[63]  Robert G. Pearce,et al.  Assessing Toxicokinetic Uncertainty and Variability in Risk Prioritization. , 2019, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[64]  Antony J. Williams,et al.  Linking in silico MS/MS spectra with chemistry data to improve identification of unknowns , 2019, Scientific Data.

[65]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  New approach methodologies for exposure science , 2019, Current Opinion in Toxicology.

[66]  Ann M Richard,et al.  The Next Generation Blueprint of Computational Toxicology at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. , 2019, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[67]  A Worth,et al.  Next generation physiologically based kinetic (NG-PBK) models in support of regulatory decision making , 2019, Computational toxicology.

[68]  Kamel Mansouri,et al.  EPA’s non-targeted analysis collaborative trial (ENTACT): genesis, design, and initial findings , 2018, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[69]  Peter Fantke,et al.  Consensus Modeling of Median Chemical Intake for the U.S. Population Based on Predictions of Exposure Pathways. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[70]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  The future of hazardous chemical safety in China: Opportunities, problems, challenges and tasks. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[71]  Jon A Arnot,et al.  A Model for Risk-Based Screening and Prioritization of Human Exposure to Chemicals from Near-Field Sources. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[72]  Antony J. Williams,et al.  “MS-Ready” structures for non-targeted high-resolution mass spectrometry screening studies , 2018, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[73]  Sean M. Ehlman,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of chemical contaminants on the behaviour, ecology and evolution of wildlife , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[74]  Von Goetz Natalie,et al.  Assessing exposure factors in the smartphone generation: Design and evaluation of a smartphone app that collects use patterns of cosmetics and household chemicals. , 2018, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[75]  Tao Hong,et al.  The Chemical and Products Database, a resource for exposure-relevant data on chemicals in consumer products , 2018, Scientific Data.

[76]  Division on Earth.  Informing Environmental Health Decisions Through Data Integration , 2018 .

[77]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Accelerating the Pace of Chemical Risk Assessment. , 2018, Chemical research in toxicology.

[78]  Antony J. Williams,et al.  OPERA models for predicting physicochemical properties and environmental fate endpoints , 2018, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[79]  Kamel Mansouri,et al.  Suspect screening and non-targeted analysis of drinking water using point-of-use filters. , 2018, Environmental pollution.

[80]  Alicia Paini,et al.  In vitro to in vivo extrapolation for high throughput prioritization and decision making. , 2018, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[81]  Sean Ekins,et al.  A bibliometric review of drug repurposing. , 2018, Drug discovery today.

[82]  Ann M Richard,et al.  Suspect Screening Analysis of Chemicals in Consumer Products. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[83]  Antony J. Williams,et al.  Integrating tools for non-targeted analysis research and chemical safety evaluations at the US EPA , 2017, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.

[84]  Antony J. Williams,et al.  The CompTox Chemistry Dashboard: a community data resource for environmental chemistry , 2017, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[85]  Robert G. Pearce,et al.  An Intuitive Approach for Predicting Potential Human Health Risk with the Tox21 10k Library. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[86]  Barbara A. Wetmore,et al.  Identifying populations sensitive to environmental chemicals by simulating toxicokinetic variability. , 2017, Environment international.

[87]  T. McKone,et al.  Model framework for integrating multiple exposure pathways to chemicals in household cleaning products , 2017, Indoor air.

[88]  A. Mah.  Environmental justice in the age of big data: challenging toxic blind spots of voice, speed, and expertise , 2017 .

[89]  Jon R. Sobus,et al.  Identifying known unknowns using the US EPA’s CompTox Chemistry Dashboard , 2017, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[90]  A M Richard,et al.  An automated curation procedure for addressing chemical errors and inconsistencies in public datasets used in QSAR modelling$ , 2016, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[91]  Peter Fantke,et al.  High-throughput exposure modeling to support prioritization of chemicals in personal care products. , 2016, Chemosphere.

[92]  Stephen M. Rappaport,et al.  Genetic Factors Are Not the Major Causes of Chronic Diseases , 2016, PloS one.

[93]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[94]  Ann M Richard,et al.  Linking high resolution mass spectrometry data with exposure and toxicity forecasts to advance high-throughput environmental monitoring. , 2016, Environment international.

[95]  Halûk Özkaynak,et al.  Computational Exposure Science: An Emerging Discipline to Support 21st-Century Risk Assessment , 2015, Environmental health perspectives.

[96]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Incorporating High-Throughput Exposure Predictions With Dosimetry-Adjusted In Vitro Bioactivity to Inform Chemical Toxicity Testing , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[97]  Peter Fantke,et al.  Exploring consumer exposure pathways and patterns of use for chemicals in the environment , 2015, Toxicology reports.

[98]  Harvey J. Clewell,et al.  Incorporating population variability and susceptible subpopulations into dosimetry for high-throughput toxicity testing. , 2014, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[99]  R. Judson,et al.  High throughput heuristics for prioritizing human exposure to environmental chemicals. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[100]  Daniel Vallero,et al.  SHEDS-HT: an integrated probabilistic exposure model for prioritizing exposures to chemicals with near-field and dietary sources. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[101]  C M Grulke,et al.  Development of a consumer product ingredient database for chemical exposure screening and prioritization. , 2014, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[102]  W. Chapman,et al.  Using Twitter to Examine Smoking Behavior and Perceptions of Emerging Tobacco Products , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[103]  David M. Reif,et al.  High-throughput models for exposure-based chemical prioritization in the ExpoCast project. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[104]  Michael S. McLachlan,et al.  Prioritizing Chemicals and Data Requirements for Screening-Level Exposure and Risk Assessment , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[105]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Incorporating human dosimetry and exposure into high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[106]  Ann Richard,et al.  Advancing Exposure Characterization for Chemical Evaluation and Risk Assessment , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[107]  David Dix,et al.  Computational Toxicology as Implemented by the U.S. EPA: Providing High Throughput Decision Support Tools for Screening and Assessing Chemical Exposure, Hazard and Risk , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[108]  Paul J. Lioy,et al.  Exposure Science: A View of the Past and Milestones for the Future , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[109]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[110]  D. Paustenbach,et al.  The European Union’s REACH regulation: a review of its history and requirements , 2009, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[111]  Paul S Price,et al.  Using publicly available information to create exposure and risk-based ranking of chemicals used in the workplace and consumer products , 2009, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[112]  Michael P. Wilson,et al.  Toward a New U.S. Chemicals Policy: Rebuilding the Foundation to Advance New Science, Green Chemistry, and Environmental Health , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[113]  M. Jayjock,et al.  Modeling framework for human exposure assessment , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[114]  Jon A Arnot,et al.  Screening level risk assessment model for chemical fate and effects in the environment. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[115]  Sean R Eddy,et al.  What is Bayesian statistics? , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[116]  Theo Stijnen,et al.  Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[117]  Ann M Richard,et al.  Distributed structure-searchable toxicity (DSSTox) public database network: a proposal. , 2002, Mutation research.

[118]  THOMAS MCCURDY,et al.  The National Exposure Research Laboratory's Consolidated Human Activity Database* , 2000, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[119]  W. Ott,et al.  Total human exposure: basic concepts, EPA field studies, and future research needs. , 1990, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[120]  W. F. Bauer,et al.  The Monte Carlo Method , 1958 .

[121]  The Importance of Chemical Research to the U.S. Economy , 2022 .

[122]  Ellen Mantus,et al.  Using 21st Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations , 2017 .

[123]  J. Popp,et al.  Pesticide productivity and food security. A review , 2012, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[124]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Integration of dosimetry, exposure, and high-throughput screening data in chemical toxicity assessment. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[125]  Olivier Bodenreider,et al.  The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..