Not only “nurture”, but also “nature”, influence the outcome of zygoma repair

Abstract The present study aims to elucidate the relationship between preoperative deviation patterns of fractured zygomas and treatment outcomes. Forty-five randomly selected patients with tri-pod type zygoma fractures were classified into a medial rotation group and a lateral rotation group, depending on preoperative deviation patterns. A minimum of 6 months after the operation, symmetry of the cheek was evaluated by three plastic surgeons using a VAS system. The evaluated scores were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, simulation of postoperative secondary deformity was performed by applying hypothetically defined relapse forces on CAD models produced by referring to the CT data of 20 patients. The deviation values obtained by the simulation were compared between the two groups. The results demonstrate that VAS scores were higher for the lateral rotation group than for the medial rotation group and that the deviation values were higher for the medial rotation group than for the lateral rotation group. It is concluded that treatment outcomes of zygoma fractures are affected by preoperative deviation patterns. Cases with medial rotation are likely to present poorer outcomes than those with lateral rotation.

[1]  L. Whitaker,et al.  The Role of Microfixation in Malar Fractures: A Quantitative Biophysical Study , 1996, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  The sphenozygomatic suture as a key site for osteosynthesis of the orbitozygomatic complex in panfacial fractures: a biomechanical study in human cadavers based on clinical practice. , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  T. Nagasao,et al.  Combined fixation with plates and transmalar Kirschner wires for zygomatic fractures , 2009, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[4]  C. Yucesoy,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of the Rigid Fixation of Zygoma Fractures: An Experimental Study , 2004, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[5]  T. Nagasao,et al.  Effectiveness of Additional Transmalar Kirschner Wire Fixation for a Zygoma Fracture , 2007, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  T. Nagasao,et al.  The Dynamic Role of Buttress Reconstruction after Maxillectomy , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  T. Nagasao,et al.  The Effect of Striking Angle on the Buckling Mechanism in Blowout Fracture , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  R. Baratta,et al.  A Comparison of Combinations of Titanium and Resorbable Plating Systems for Repair of Isolated Zygomatic Fractures in the Adult: A Quantitative Biomechanical Study , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[9]  D. Nickerson,et al.  Zygomatic Fractures: Comparison of Methods of Internal Fixation , 1990, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  Mark C. Martin,et al.  Quantitative comparison of open reduction and internal fixation versus the Gillies method in the treatment of orbitozygomatic complex fractures. , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  Carsten Westendorff,et al.  Computer-Assisted Surgical Treatment of Orbitozygomatic Fractures , 2006, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[12]  L. Stassen,et al.  Anatomical study of factors contributing to zygomatic complex fracture instability in human cadavers. , 2007, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  T. Nagasao,et al.  Experimental evaluation of relapse-risks in operated zygoma fractures. , 2009, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[14]  J. North,et al.  The classification of malar fractures: an analysis of displacement as a guide to treatment. , 1961, British journal of plastic surgery.

[15]  L. Hollier,et al.  The management of orbitozygomatic fractures. , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.