Softer is Harder: What Differentiates Soft Robotics from Hard Robotics?

This paper reports on what differentiates the field of soft (i.e. soft-bodied) robotics from the conventional hard (i.e. rigid-bodied) robotics. The main difference centres on seamlessly combining the actuation, sensing, motion transmission and conversion mechanism elements, electronics and power source into a continuum body that ideally holds the properties of morphological computation and programmable compliance (i.e. softness). Another difference is about the materials they are made of. While the hard robots are made of rigid materials such as metals and hard plastics with a bulk elastic modulus of as low as 1 GPa, the monolithic soft robots should be fabricated from soft and hard materials or from a strategic combination of them with a maximum elasticity modulus of 1 GPa. Soft smart materials with programmable mechanical, electrical and rheological properties, and conformable to additive manufacturing based on 3D printing are essential to realise soft robots. Selecting the actuation concept and its power source, which is the first and most important step in establishing a robot, determines the size, weight, performance of the soft robot, the type of sensors and their location, control algorithm, power requirement and its associated flexible and stretchable electronics. This paper outlines how crucial the soft materials are in realising the actuation concept, which can be inspired from animal and plant movements.

[1]  G. Alici,et al.  Performance Quantification of Conducting Polymer Actuators for Real Applications: A Microgripping System , 2007, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[2]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Pneumatic Networks for Soft Robotics that Actuate Rapidly , 2014 .

[3]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[4]  Nikolaus Correll,et al.  Materials that couple sensing, actuation, computation, and communication , 2015, Science.

[5]  G. Alici,et al.  Pushing the Limits for Microactuators Based on Electroactive Polymers , 2012, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[6]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Autonomous undulatory serpentine locomotion utilizing body dynamics of a fluidic soft robot , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[7]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[8]  Gursel Alici,et al.  A Soft Mechatronic Microstage Mechanism Based on Electroactive Polymer Actuators , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[9]  Shoichi Iikura,et al.  Development of flexible microactuator and its applications to robotic mechanisms , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Tianjiang Zheng,et al.  Design, modeling and control of a pneumatically actuated manipulator inspired by biological continuum structures , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[11]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Buckling of Elastomeric Beams Enables Actuation of Soft Machines , 2015, Advanced materials.

[12]  Ningqun Guo,et al.  Dynamic behavior of MR suspensions at moderate flux densities , 2004 .

[13]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Using explosions to power a soft robot. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[14]  W. Kier,et al.  Tongues, tentacles and trunks: the biomechanics of movement in muscular‐hydrostats , 1985 .

[15]  YapHong Kai,et al.  High-Force Soft Printable Pneumatics for Soft Robotic Applications , 2016 .

[16]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  The challenges ahead for bio-inspired 'soft' robotics , 2012, CACM.

[17]  T. Tjahjowidodo,et al.  A New Approach to Modeling Hysteresis in a Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Using The Maxwell-Slip Model , 2011, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[18]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Soft Robotic Grippers for Biological Sampling on Deep Reefs , 2016, Soft robotics.

[19]  Gursel Alici,et al.  A starfish robot based on soft and smart modular structure (SMS) actuated by SMA wires , 2016, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[20]  Shuichi Wakimoto,et al.  Miniature Pneumatic Curling Rubber Actuator Generating Bidirectional Motion with One Air-Supply Tube , 2011, Adv. Robotics.

[21]  Xuanhe Zhao,et al.  Hydraulic hydrogel actuators and robots optically and sonically camouflaged in water , 2017, Nature Communications.

[22]  M SpinksGeoffrey,et al.  3D Printed Flexure Hinges for Soft Monolithic Prosthetic Fingers , 2016 .

[23]  TrimmerBarry A Practical Approach to Soft Actuation , 2017 .

[24]  R J Full,et al.  How animals move: an integrative view. , 2000, Science.

[25]  C. Keplinger,et al.  25th Anniversary Article: A Soft Future: From Robots and Sensor Skin to Energy Harvesters , 2013, Advanced materials.

[26]  Shannon E Bakarich,et al.  4D Printing with Mechanically Robust, Thermally Actuating Hydrogels. , 2015, Macromolecular rapid communications.

[27]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  Design and Kinematic Modeling of Constant Curvature Continuum Robots: A Review , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[28]  Weihua Li,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of MR elastomers under harmonic loading , 2010 .

[29]  Jamie Paik,et al.  Stretchable Materials for Robust Soft Actuators towards Assistive Wearable Devices , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  The kinematics of hyper-redundant robot locomotion , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[31]  Helmut Hauser,et al.  Towards a theoretical foundation for morphological computation with compliant bodies , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  B. Hochner,et al.  Octopuses Use a Human-like Strategy to Control Precise Point-to-Point Arm Movements , 2006, Current Biology.