INTRINSIC PROPERTIES OF BIOLOGICAL MOTION DETECTORS PREVENT THE OPTOMOTOR CONTROL SYSTEM FROM GETTING UNSTABLE

Compensatory eye, head or body movements are essential to stabilize the gaze or the path of locomotion. Because such compensatory responses usually lag the sensory input by a time delay, the underlying control system is prone to instability, at least if it operates with a high gain in order to compensate disturbances efficiently. In behavioural experiments it could be shown that the optomotor system of the fly does not get unstable even when its overall gain is so high that, on average, imposed disturbances are compensated to a large extent. Fluctuations of the animal's torque signal do not build up. Rather they are accompanied by only small-amplitude jittery retinal image displacements that rarely slip over more than a few neighbouring photoreceptors. Combined electrophysiological experiments on a pair of neurons in the fly's optomotor pathway and model simulations of the optomotor control system suggest that this relative stability of the optomotor system is the consequence of the specific velocity dependence of biological movement detectors. The response of the movement detectors first increases with increasing velocity, reaches a maximum and then decreases again. As a consequence, large-amplitude fluctuations in pattern velocity, as are generated when the optomotor system tends to get unstable, are transmitted with a small gain leading to only relatively small torque fluctuations and, thus, small-amplitude image displacements.

[1]  K Kirschfeld,et al.  An optomotor control system with automatic compensation for contrast and texture , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly's nervous system. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  Benjamin C. Kuo,et al.  AUTOMATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS , 1962, Universum:Technical sciences.

[4]  A. Borst,et al.  Neural circuit tuning fly visual interneurons to motion of small objects. I. Dissection of the circuit by pharmacological and photoinactivation techniques. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Adaptation of the motion-sensitive neuron H1 is generated locally and governed by contrast frequency , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[6]  J. Movshon The velocity tuning of single units in cat striate cortex. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  L. Young,et al.  Pursuit eye tracking movements , 1971 .

[8]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Visual Motion and Its Role in the Stabilization of Gaze , 1992 .

[9]  C L Baker,et al.  Spatial- and temporal-frequency selectivity as a basis for velocity preference in cat striate cortex neurons , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Holub,et al.  Response of Visual Cortical Neurons of the cat to moving sinusoidal gratings: response-contrast functions and spatiotemporal interactions. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  L Maffei,et al.  Spatial‐frequency characteristics of neurones of area 18 in the cat: dependence on the velocity of the visual stimulus. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  R. Hardie Functional Organization of the Fly Retina , 1985 .

[13]  J A Movshon,et al.  Visual cortical signals supporting smooth pursuit eye movements. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.

[14]  S. G. Lisberger,et al.  A Control Systems Model of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements with Realistic Emergent Properties , 1989, Neural Computation.

[15]  M. Heisenberg,et al.  Vision in Drosophila , 1984 .

[16]  G. Orban,et al.  Speed and direction selectivity of macaque middle temporal neurons. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Übertragungseigenschaften im Auswertesystem für das Bewegungssehen , 1959 .

[18]  W Reichardt,et al.  Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly: Part I. A quantitative analysis , 1976, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[19]  E. J. Morris,et al.  Visual motion processing and sensory-motor integration for smooth pursuit eye movements. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  S G Lisberger,et al.  Effect of changing feedback delay on spontaneous oscillations in smooth pursuit eye movements of monkeys. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Michael F. Land,et al.  Visual tracking and pursuit: Humans and arthropods compared , 1992 .

[22]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Principles of visual motion detection , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  S. Laughlin Neural Principles in the Peripheral Visual Systems of Invertebrates , 1981 .

[24]  M. Ibbotson,et al.  Spatiotemporal response properties of direction-selective neurons in the nucleus of the optic tract and dorsal terminal nucleus of the wallaby, Macropus eugenii. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  J. T. Leutscher-Hazelhoff,et al.  Linear and non‐linear performance of transducer and pupil in Calliphora retinula cells. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.