Estimation of the proportion ratio under a simple crossover trial

The proportion ratio (PR) of patient response is one of the most commonly used indices for measuring the relative treatment effect in a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Assuming a random effect multiplicative risk model, we develop two point estimators and three interval estimators in closed forms for the PR under a simple crossover RCT. On the basis of Monte Carlo simulation, we evaluate the performance of these estimators in a variety of situations. We note that the point estimator using a ratio of two arithmetic means of patient response probabilities over the two groups (distinguished by the order of treatment-received sequences) is generally preferable to the corresponding one using a ratio of two geometric means of patient response probabilities. We note that the three interval estimators developed in this paper can actually perform well with respect to the coverage probability when the number of patients per group is moderate or large. We further note that the interval estimator based on the ratio of two arithmetic means of patient response probabilities with the logarithmic transformation is probably the best among the three interval estimators discussed here. We use a simple crossover trial studying the suitability of two new inhalation devices for patients who were using a standard inhaler device delivering Salbutamol published elsewhere to illustrate the use of these estimators.

[1]  M. C. Sheps,et al.  Shall we count the living of the dead. , 1958, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Grizzle THE TWO-PERIOD CHANGE-OVER DESIGN AN ITS USE IN CLINICAL TRIALS. , 1965, Biometrics.

[3]  G. Casella,et al.  Statistical Inference , 2003, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[4]  Kung-Jong Lui,et al.  Statistical Estimation of Epidemiological Risk , 2004 .

[5]  J. Gart An exact test for comparing matched proportions in crossover designs , 1969 .

[6]  Mindel C. Sheps,et al.  An Examination of Some Methods of Comparing Several Rates or Proportions , 1959 .

[7]  D. Cox,et al.  Analysis of Binary Data (2nd ed.). , 1990 .

[8]  D L Sackett,et al.  An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Stephen Senn,et al.  Cross-over trials in clinical research , 1993 .

[10]  S P Azen,et al.  OBTAINING CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE RISK RATIO IN COHORT STUDIES , 1978 .

[11]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[12]  Shein-Chung Chow Encyclopedia of Biopharmaceutical Statistics , 2010 .

[13]  Kung-Jong Lui,et al.  Test non‐inferiority (and equivalence) based on the odds ratio under a simple crossover trial , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[15]  A simple analysis of a simple crossover trial with a dichotomous outcome measure , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  S. Chow,et al.  On Assessment of Bioequivalence for Drugs with Negligible Plasma Levels , 1993 .

[17]  David R. Cox The analysis of binary data , 1970 .

[18]  D. Cox The Regression Analysis of Binary Sequences , 1958 .

[19]  Testing Hypotheses in the Two‐period Change‐over with Binary Data , 1978 .

[20]  J. Whitehead,et al.  A random effects model for binary data from crossover clinical trials , 1992 .

[21]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[22]  Stephen Senn,et al.  Cross‐over trials in Statistics in Medicine: the first ‘25’ years , 2006, Statistics in medicine.