Freshwater corridors in the conterminous United States: A coarse‐filter approach based on lake‐stream networks

[1]  K. Cheruvelil,et al.  Lake networks and connectivity metrics for the conterminous U.S. (LAGOS‐US NETWORKS v1) , 2021, Limnology and Oceanography Letters.

[2]  P. Soranno,et al.  LAGOS‐US LOCUS v1.0: Data module of location, identifiers, and physical characteristics of lakes and their watersheds in the conterminous U.S. , 2021, Limnology and Oceanography Letters.

[3]  J. Olden,et al.  Twenty‐five essential research questions to inform the protection and restoration of freshwater biodiversity , 2021, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.

[4]  L. Epele,et al.  Drivers of biodiversity loss in freshwater environments: A bibliometric analysis of the recent literature , 2021, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.

[5]  Jonathan B. Armstrong,et al.  The importance of warm habitat to the growth regime of cold-water fishes , 2021, Nature Climate Change.

[6]  J. Harvey,et al.  The River Corridor's Evolving Connectivity of Lotic and Lentic Waters , 2021, Frontiers in Water.

[7]  Mary T. Bremigan,et al.  Surface water connectivity affects lake and stream fish species richness and composition , 2020 .

[8]  D. Isaak,et al.  Landscape resistance mediates native fish species distribution shifts and vulnerability to climate change in riverscapes , 2020, Global change biology.

[9]  B. Letcher,et al.  Managing climate refugia for freshwater fishes under an expanding human footprint , 2020, Frontiers in ecology and the environment.

[10]  D. Stralberg,et al.  Toward a climate‐informed North American protected areas network: Incorporating climate‐change refugia and corridors in conservation planning , 2020, Conservation Letters.

[11]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Impacts of current and future large dams on the geographic range connectivity of freshwater fish worldwide , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  S. Dobrowski,et al.  Human land uses reduce climate connectivity across North America , 2020, Global change biology.

[13]  Tibor Erős,et al.  The Landscape Ecology of Rivers: from Patch-Based to Spatial Network Analyses , 2019, Current Landscape Ecology Reports.

[14]  P. Soranno,et al.  No lake left behind: How well do U.S. protected areas meet lake conservation targets? , 2019, Limnology and Oceanography Letters.

[15]  P. Soranno,et al.  Applying the patch-matrix model to lakes: a connectivity-based conservation framework , 2019, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  Alexander Veremyev,et al.  Critical Nodes in River Networks , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[17]  J. Lawler,et al.  Connectivity for species on the move: supporting climate‐driven range shifts , 2019, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[18]  P. Reichert,et al.  Ecological assessment of river networks: From reach to catchment scale. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  Jennifer K. Costanza,et al.  Landscape Connectivity Planning for Adaptation to Future Climate and Land-Use Change , 2019, Current Landscape Ecology Reports.

[20]  M. Fortin,et al.  Inland surface waters in protected areas globally: Current coverage and 30-year trends , 2019, PloS one.

[21]  Robert A. Norheim,et al.  Identifying riparian climate corridors to inform climate adaptation planning , 2018, PloS one.

[22]  C. Arp,et al.  The complementary role of lentic and lotic habitats for Arctic grayling in a complex stream‐lake network in Arctic Alaska , 2018, Ecology of Freshwater Fish.

[23]  S. Dobrowski,et al.  Climatic, topographic, and anthropogenic factors determine connectivity between current and future climate analogs in North America , 2018, Global change biology.

[24]  Pedro Beja,et al.  Freshwater conservation in a fragmented world: Dealing with barriers in a systematic planning framework , 2018 .

[25]  Jane S. Fencl,et al.  The blind men and the elephant examine biodiversity at low‐head dams: Are we all dealing with the same dam reality? , 2017 .

[26]  J. Secondi,et al.  Network analysis for species management in rivers networks: Application to the Loire River , 2017 .

[27]  Travis O. Brenden,et al.  Assessment of dam effects on streams and fish assemblages of the conterminous USA. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  Louise McRae,et al.  The Diversity-Weighted Living Planet Index: Controlling for Taxonomic Bias in a Global Biodiversity Indicator , 2017, PloS one.

[29]  Jeffrey A. Falke,et al.  Climate Change Effects on North American Inland Fish Populations and Assemblages , 2016 .

[30]  Richard K. Johnson,et al.  Adapting boreal streams to climate change: effects of riparian vegetation on water temperature and biological assemblages , 2016, Freshwater Science.

[31]  D. Theobald,et al.  Achieving climate connectivity in a fragmented landscape , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Philip Leitner,et al.  Multiscale connectivity and graph theory highlight critical areas for conservation under climate change. , 2016, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[33]  Brad H McRae,et al.  Identifying Corridors among Large Protected Areas in the United States , 2016, PloS one.

[34]  Peter H. Singleton,et al.  Focal species and landscape “naturalness” corridor models offer complementary approaches for connectivity conservation planning , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[35]  M. Tulbure,et al.  Surface water network structure, landscape resistance to movement and flooding vital for maintaining ecological connectivity across Australia’s largest river basin , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  Clinton N. Jenkins,et al.  US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  J. Olden,et al.  Climate change poised to threaten hydrologic connectivity and endemic fishes in dryland streams , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  M. Fortin,et al.  EDITOR'S CHOICE: Stepping stones are crucial for species' long‐distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks , 2014 .

[39]  J. Fischenich,et al.  Assessing upstream fish passage connectivity with network analysis. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[40]  J. Olden,et al.  Projected climate-driven faunal movement routes. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[41]  W. Darwall,et al.  Global patterns of freshwater species diversity, threat and endemism , 2013, Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology.

[42]  Brad H McRae,et al.  Connectivity Planning to Address Climate Change , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[43]  Laëtitia Buisson,et al.  Climate‐induced changes in the distribution of freshwater fish: observed and predicted trends , 2013 .

[44]  John G. Williams,et al.  Improving connectivity between freshwater and marine environments for salmon migrating through the lower Snake and Columbia River hydropower system , 2012 .

[45]  Dénes Schmera,et al.  Characterizing connectivity relationships in freshwaters using patch-based graphs , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[46]  M. Gangloff,et al.  The influence of low-head dams on fish assemblages in streams across Alabama , 2011, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[47]  Paul Beier,et al.  Toward Best Practices for Developing Regional Connectivity Maps , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[48]  K. Collier.  Editorial: The rapid rise of streams and rivers in conservation assessment , 2011 .

[49]  Andrew Fall,et al.  Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures. , 2011, Ecology.

[50]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[51]  Santiago Saura,et al.  A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape , 2010 .

[52]  Ulla Mörtberg,et al.  Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design , 2010 .

[53]  Dirk J. Roux,et al.  Progress and challenges in freshwater conservation planning , 2009 .

[54]  Robert S Schick,et al.  Graph models of habitat mosaics. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[55]  Lester L. Yuan,et al.  Striving for consistency in a national assessment: the challenges of applying a reference-condition approach at a continental scale , 2008, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[56]  Ernesto Estrada,et al.  Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[57]  Julian D. Olden,et al.  Dam invaders: impoundments facilitate biological invasions into freshwaters , 2008 .

[58]  Paul Beier,et al.  Forks in the Road: Choices in Procedures for Designing Wildland Linkages , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[59]  Dean L Urban,et al.  A Graph‐Theory Framework for Evaluating Landscape Connectivity and Conservation Planning , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[60]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis , 2007 .

[61]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Development of inland lakes as hubs in an invasion network , 2005 .

[62]  R. Abell.  Conservation Biology for the Biodiversity Crisis: a Freshwater Follow‐up , 2002 .

[63]  J. Meeuwig,et al.  Freshwater Protected Areas: Strategies for Conservation , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[64]  P. Beier,et al.  Do Habitat Corridors Provide Connectivity? , 1998 .

[65]  J. Magnuson,et al.  Patterns in the Species Composition and Richness of Fish Assemblages in Northern Wisconsin Lakes , 1982 .

[66]  Emanuel A. Fronhofer,et al.  Dispersal in dendritic networks: Ecological consequences on the spatial distribution of population densities , 2018 .

[67]  L. Paasivirta,et al.  Highly variable species distribution models in a subarctic stream metacommunity: Patterns, mechanisms and implications , 2018 .

[68]  T. Erős,et al.  Does isolation influence the relative role of environmental and dispersal‐related processes in stream networks? An empirical test of the network position hypothesis using multiple taxa , 2018 .

[69]  Paul Beier,et al.  Use of land facets to design linkages for climate change. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[70]  Dénes Schmera,et al.  Network thinking in riverscape conservation – A graph-based approach , 2011 .

[71]  Christer Nilsson,et al.  Effects of hydropower generation and opportunities for environmental flow management in Swedish riverine ecosystems , 2010 .

[72]  M. Frisk,et al.  The historic influence of dams on diadromous fish habitat with a focus on river herring and hydrologic longitudinal connectivity , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[73]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Conefor Sensinode 2.2: A software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[74]  E. Zavaleta,et al.  Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations , 2009 .

[75]  R. Abell,et al.  Unlocking the potential of protected areas for freshwaters , 2007 .