Methods to Reduce Traffic Crashes Involving Deer: What Works and What Does Not

More than 1.5 million traffic crashes involving deer, producing at least $1.1 billion in vehicle damage and about 150 fatalities, are estimated to occur annually in the United States. Deer-related crashes are increasing as both deer populations and vehicular travel increase. Many methods have been used in attempts to reduce deer crashes, often with little scientific foundation and limited evaluation. This article summarizes the methods and reviews the evidence of their effectiveness and the situations in which each may be useful. The only widely accepted method with solid evidence of effectiveness is well-designed and maintained fencing, combined with underpasses or overpasses as appropriate. Herd reduction is controversial but can be effective. Deer whistles appear useless. Roadside reflectors appear to have little long-term effect, although additional well-designed evaluations are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. Both temporary passive signs and active signs appear promising in specific situations, but considerable research is required to evaluate long-term driver response and to improve and test deer detection technology for active signs. Other methods using advanced technology require substantial additional research and evaluation.

[1]  Laura A. Romin,et al.  Lack of Response by Mule Deer to Wildlife Warning Whistles , 1992 .

[2]  Dale F. Reed,et al.  Use of One-Way Gates by Mule Deer , 1974 .

[3]  Conover,et al.  Review of Human Injuries, Illnesses, and Economic Losses Caused by Wildlife in the United States , 1995 .

[4]  R. Allen,et al.  Deer-Car Accidents in Southern Michigan , 1976 .

[5]  M. Wolfe,et al.  Intercept Feeding as a Means of Reducing Deer-Vehicle Collisions , 1988 .

[6]  Michael W. Hubbard,et al.  A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR ASSESSING THE STATUS OF CURRENT METHODS OF REDUCING DEER-VEHICLE COLLISIONS , 1998 .

[7]  M. Richmond,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF A VERTICAL 3-WIRE ELECTRIC FENCE MODIFIED WITH ATTRACTANTS OR REPELLENTS AS A DEER EXCLOSURE , 1991 .

[8]  E. Hazebroek,et al.  Ungulate Traffic Collisions in Europe , 1996 .

[9]  Df Reed,et al.  Methods of Reducing Deer-Vehicle Accidents: Benefit-Cost Analysis , 1982 .

[10]  Terry A. Messmer,et al.  Perceptions of Deer-Vehicle Collision Management by State Wildlife Agency and Department of Transportation Administrators , 2003 .

[11]  Humphrey,et al.  Use of Highway Underpasses by Florida Panthers and Other Wildlife , 1995 .

[12]  P. Olbrich Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit von Wildwarnreflektoren und der Eignung von Wilddurchlässen , 1984, Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft.

[13]  F Pafko,et al.  MINNESOTA EXPERIENCE WITH DEER REFLECTORS , 1996 .

[14]  R. J. Putmam Deer and Road Traffic Accidents: Options for Management , 1997 .

[15]  Gardner M. Brown,et al.  Mallard Population Dynamics and Management Models , 1976 .

[16]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  Effectiveness of temporary warning signs in reducing deer-vehicle collisions during mule deer migrations , 2004 .

[17]  R Lehtimaki ELK AND WHITE-TAIL DEER AS TRAFFIC HAZARD , 1984 .

[18]  James R. Gilbert EVALUATION OF DEER MIRRORS FOR REDUCING DEER-VEHICLE COLLISIONS , 1982 .

[19]  K M Gordon,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE FLASH (FLASHING LIGHT ANIMAL SENSING HOST) SYSTEM IN NUGGET CANYON, WYOMING , 2001 .

[20]  M. Baucus Transportation Research Board , 1982 .

[21]  John A. Bissonette,et al.  Effectiveness of Highway Crosswalk Structures at Reducing Deer-Vehicle Collisions , 1997 .

[22]  F. Singer,et al.  Managing Mountain Goats at a Highway Crossing , 1985 .

[23]  Df Reed,et al.  REGIONAL DEER-VEHICLE ACCIDENT RESEARCH , 1979 .

[24]  H B Graves,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DEER FLAGGING MODELS AS DETERRENTS TO DEER ENTERING HIGHWAY RIGHTS-OF-WAY , 1978 .

[25]  James L Zacks DO WHITE-TAILED DEER AVOID RED? AN EVALUATION OF THE PREMISE UNDERLYING THE DESIGN OF SWAREFLEX WILDLIFE REFLECTORS (DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE) , 1986 .

[26]  Michael W. Hubbard,et al.  Factors influencing the location of deer-vehicle accidents in Iowa. , 2000 .

[27]  Allan F. Williams The Contribution of Education and Public Information to Reducing Alcohol-Impaired Driving. , 1994 .

[28]  N P Humphrey MANAGING SPEED: REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE FOR SETTING AND ENFORCING SPEED LIMITS: NEW TRB SPECIAL REPORT , 1998 .

[29]  Dale F. Reed,et al.  Effectiveness of Highway Lighting in Reducing Deer-Vehicle Accidents , 1981 .

[30]  Mary Bomford,et al.  SONIC DETERRENTS IN ANIMAL DAMAGE CONTROL: A REVIEW OF DEVICE TESTS AND EFFECTIVENESS , 1990 .

[31]  H B Graves,et al.  Highway Right-of-Way Fences as Deer Deterrents , 1978 .

[32]  J. S. Lindzey,et al.  FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHWAY MORTALITY OF WHITE-TAILED DEER , 1974 .

[33]  J. Landers,et al.  Duck Foods in Managed Tidal Impoundments in South Carolina , 1976 .

[34]  H B Graves,et al.  HIGHWAY FENCES AS DETERRENTS TO VEHICLE-DEER COLLISIONS , 1978 .

[35]  Michael R. Conover,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Deer Repellents , 1995 .

[36]  Aksel Bo Madsen,et al.  Effectiveness of Wildlife Warning Reflectors in Reducing Deer-Vehicle Collisions: A Behavioral Study , 1998 .

[37]  Alan D. Woolf,et al.  Site and landscape conditions at white-tailed deer/vehicle collision locations in Illinois , 1999 .

[38]  Jim Bertwistle The Effects of Reduced Speed Zones on Reducing Bighorn Sheep and Elk Collisions with Vehicles on Yellowhead Highway in Jasper National Park , 1999 .

[39]  J F Paniati HIGHWAY SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEM , 1990 .

[40]  A Lorin Ward,et al.  MULE DEER BEHAVIOR IN RELATION TO FENCING AND UNDERPASSES ON INTERSTATE 80 IN WYOMING , 1982 .

[41]  G. A. Feldhamer,et al.  Effects of interstate highway fencing on white-tailed deer activity , 1986 .

[42]  P. H. Pedersen,et al.  Moose-train collisions: The effects of vegetation removal with a cost-benefit analysis , 1991 .

[43]  Lars Åberg The human factor in game-vehicle accidents: A study of drivers' information acquisition , 1981 .

[44]  D. F. Reed,et al.  BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE OF MULE DEER TO A HIGHWAY UNDERPASS , 1975 .

[45]  T. L. Brown,et al.  The future of hunting as a mechanism to control white-tailed deer populations. , 2000 .

[46]  Daniel J. Decker,et al.  PERCEPTIONS OF RISK FROM DEER-RELATED VEHICLE ACCIDENTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR DEER HERD SIZE , 1993 .

[47]  K. Vercauteren,et al.  Managing White-tailed Deer in Suburban Environments , 2000 .

[48]  T. R. McCabe,et al.  Recounting whitetails past , 1997 .

[49]  D. F. Reed,et al.  Effectiveness of a Lighted, Animated Deer Crossing Sign , 1975 .

[50]  Laura A. Romin,et al.  Deer-Vehicle Collisions: Nationwide Status of State Monitoring Activities and Efforts , 1996 .

[51]  Paul D. Curtis,et al.  PREVENTING DEER DAMAGE WITH BARRIER, ELECTRICAL, AND BEHAVIORAL FENCING SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[52]  Stephen T. Penland,et al.  Effectiveness of Swareflex Reflectors in Reducing Deer-Vehicle Accidents , 1985 .

[53]  D. F. Reed Mule Deer Behavior at a Highway Underpass Exit , 1981 .

[54]  Stanley H. Anderson,et al.  Ineffectiveness of Swareflex Reflectors at Reducing Deer-Vehicle Collisions , 1993 .

[55]  A. A. Knecht EVALUATION OF A , 1972 .

[56]  John Ludwig,et al.  EVALUATION OF 2.4-M FENCES AND ONE-WAY GATES FOR REDUCING DEER-VEHICLE COLLISIONS IN MINNESOTA , 1983 .