Sensitive and accurate quantification of human malaria parasites using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)

Accurate quantification of parasite density in the human host is essential for understanding the biology and pathology of malaria. Semi-quantitative molecular methods are widely applied, but the need for an external standard curve makes it difficult to compare parasite density estimates across studies. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) allows direct quantification without the need for a standard curve. ddPCR was used to diagnose and quantify P. falciparum and P. vivax in clinical patients as well as in asymptomatic samples. ddPCR yielded highly reproducible measurements across the range of parasite densities observed in humans, and showed higher sensitivity than qPCR to diagnose P. falciparum, and equal sensitivity for P. vivax. Correspondence in quantification was very high (>0.95) between qPCR and ddPCR. Quantification between technical replicates by ddPCR differed 1.5–1.7-fold, compared to 2.4–6.2-fold by qPCR. ddPCR facilitates parasite quantification for studies where absolute densities are required, and will increase comparability of results reported from different laboratories.

[1]  R. Molestina,et al.  Development of droplet digital PCR for the detection of Babesia microti and Babesia duncani. , 2015, Experimental parasitology.

[2]  Martin Walker,et al.  Predicting mosquito infection from Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte density and estimating the reservoir of infection , 2013, eLife.

[3]  Anna Rosanas-Urgell,et al.  Comparison of diagnostic methods for the detection and quantification of the four sympatric Plasmodium species in field samples from Papua New Guinea , 2010, Malaria Journal.

[4]  Jing Wang,et al.  Comparison of four digital PCR platforms for accurate quantification of DNA copy number of a certified plasmid DNA reference material , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Christian Mazza,et al.  Statistical significance of quantitative PCR , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  Richard B. Thomson,et al.  Real-Time PCR for Detection and Identification of Plasmodium spp , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  Senjie Lin,et al.  Serious Overestimation in Quantitative PCR by Circular (Supercoiled) Plasmid Standard: Microalgal pcna as the Model Gene , 2010, PloS one.

[8]  R. Price,et al.  Parasite Biomass-Related Inflammation, Endothelial Activation, Microvascular Dysfunction and Disease Severity in Vivax Malaria , 2015, PLoS pathogens.

[9]  J. Barnwell.  Cytoadherence and sequestration in falciparum malaria. , 1989, Experimental parasitology.

[10]  D. Saunders,et al.  Multiplex qPCR for Detection and Absolute Quantification of Malaria , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Qin Cheng,et al.  Systematic Review of Sub-microscopic P. vivax Infections: Prevalence and Determining Factors , 2015, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[12]  T. Yeo,et al.  Plasma Plasmodium falciparum Histidine-Rich Protein-2 Concentrations Are Associated with Malaria Severity and Mortality in Tanzanian Children , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  S. Herrera,et al.  Plasmodium vivax gametocyte infectivity in sub-microscopic infections , 2016, Malaria Journal.

[14]  V. Lulitanond,et al.  Detection and quantification of Wuchereria bancrofti and Brugia malayi DNA in blood samples and mosquitoes using duplex droplet digital polymerase chain reaction , 2016, Parasitology Research.

[15]  L. Robinson,et al.  Ultra-Sensitive Detection of Plasmodium falciparum by Amplification of Multi-Copy Subtelomeric Targets , 2015, PLoS medicine.

[16]  F. Nosten,et al.  Numerical Distributions of Parasite Densities During Asymptomatic Malaria , 2015, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[17]  Jeff Mellen,et al.  High-Throughput Droplet Digital PCR System for Absolute Quantitation of DNA Copy Number , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  P. Siba,et al.  Blood-Stage Parasitaemia and Age Determine Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax Gametocytaemia in Papua New Guinea , 2015, PloS one.

[19]  Teun Bousema,et al.  Factors determining the occurrence of submicroscopic malaria infections and their relevance for control , 2012, Nature Communications.

[20]  Paul Monis,et al.  Comparison of next-generation droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) with quantitative PCR (qPCR) for enumeration of Cryptosporidium oocysts in faecal samples. , 2014, International journal for parasitology.

[21]  Qin Cheng,et al.  Novel molecular diagnostic tools for malaria elimination: a review of options from the point of view of high-throughput and applicability in resource limited settings , 2016, Malaria Journal.

[22]  R. Howes,et al.  Malaria diagnosis for malaria elimination , 2015, Current opinion in infectious diseases.

[23]  Christopher M. Hindson,et al.  Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR , 2013, Nature Methods.