When the fingers do the talking: A study of group participation with varying constraints to a tabletop interface

A user study is presented that investigates how different configurations of input can influence equity of participation around a tabletop interface. Groups of three worked on a design task requiring negotiation in four interface conditions that varied the number (all members can act or only one) and type (touch versus mice) of input. Our findings show that a multi-touch surface increases physical interaction equity and perceptions of dominance, but does not affect levels of verbal participation. Dominant people still continue to talk the most, while quiet ones remain quiet. Qualitative analyses further revealed how other factors can affect how participants contribute to the task. The findings are discussed in terms of how the design of the physical technological set-up can affect the desired form of collaboration.

[1]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making, 3: disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  Allison Druin,et al.  When two hands are better than one: enhancing collaboration using single display groupware , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[3]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Transcending the individual human mind—creating shared understanding through collaborative design , 2000, TCHI.

[4]  B. Bederson,et al.  Designing storytelling technologies to encouraging collaboration between young children , 2000, CHI.

[5]  Darren Leigh,et al.  DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology , 2001, UIST '01.

[6]  Donald C. Pennington,et al.  The social psychology of behaviour in small groups , 2002 .

[7]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[8]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces , 2003, INTERACT.

[9]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  System Guidelines for Co-located, Collaborative Work on a Tabletop Display , 2003, ECSCW.

[10]  Kathy Ryall,et al.  UbiTable: Impromptu Face-to-Face Collaboration on Horizontal Interactive Surfaces , 2003, UbiComp.

[11]  Walter Bender,et al.  Influencing group participation with a shared display , 2004, CSCW.

[12]  F. Biocca,et al.  Internal Consistency and Reliability of the Networked MindsMeasure of Social Presence , 2004 .

[13]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[14]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Collaborating around vertical and horizontal displays: which way is best? , 2004 .

[15]  F. Biocca,et al.  Internal Consistency and Reliability of the Networked Minds Social Presence Measure , 2006 .

[16]  Michael Fitze,et al.  DISCOURSE AND PARTICIPATION IN ESL FACE-TO-FACE AND WRITTEN ELECTRONIC CONFERENCES , 2006 .

[17]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Mediating Group Dynamics through Tabletop Interface Design , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[18]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  Achieving Understanding in Face-to-Face and Video-Mediated Multiparty Interactions , 2006 .

[19]  Janienke Sturm,et al.  Influencing social dynamics in meetings through a peripheral display , 2007, ICMI '07.

[20]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Entry and access : how shareability comes about , 2007 .

[21]  Seán Kelly,et al.  Classroom discourse and the distribution of student engagement , 2007 .

[22]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  Multiple mice for retention tasks in disadvantaged schools , 2007, CHI.

[23]  John Leckey,et al.  Two Hands are Better Than One , 2007 .

[24]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  An exploratory study of input configuration and group process in a negotiation task using a large display , 2007, CHI.

[25]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  From entry to access: how shareability comes about , 2007, DPPI.

[26]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Social enjoyment with electronic photo displays : Awareness and control , 2008 .

[27]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  "I'm keeping those there, are you?" The role of a new user interface paradigm - Separate Control of Shared Space (SCOSS) - in the collaborative decision-making process , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Social enjoyment with electronic photograph displays: Awareness and control , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Equal Opportunities: Do Shareable Interfaces Promote More Group Participation Than Single User Displays? , 2009, Hum. Comput. Interact..