An optimized enumeration method for sorbitol-fermenting Bifidobacteria in water samples.

With increased focus on watershed protection under the Surface Water Treatment Rule, indicators that discriminate among sources of microbial inputs (microbial source tracking) are needed to supplement the quantitative information provided by total and fecal coliform measurements for drinking water monitoring. Bifidobacteria are found in the digestive tract and feces of humans and other animals, and also in sewage. Sorbitol is a food additive used exclusively in food intended for human consumption. Therefore, the presence of sorbitol-fermenting Bifidobacteria in environmental waters can be indicative of sources of human fecal contamination. A series of media were evaluated using ATCC cultures of B. breve and B. adolescentis, feces from different animals, and domestic wastewater samples. The media evaluated were Human Bifid Sorbitol agar (HBSA), modified Human Bifid Sorbitol agar, Beerens Medium, modified Beerens Medium, Reinforced Clostridial agar, BIM-25 Medium, and modified BIM-25 Medium. Variables such as sample preservation, incubation time, different pH indicators, plating technique, and discontinuous exposure to sorbitol were also evaluated. A series of biochemical tests were used to confirm positive colonies enumerated on the various media. Membrane filtration and enumeration of sodium sulfite preserved samples on HBSA containing bromocresol purple using loose lidded plates for 48 h provided the best recoveries for presumptive positive colonies. A number of sorbitol-fermenters that were not Bifidobacteria were able to grow on all media tested, resulting in false-positives. Therefore, plating on HBSA should be followed by a confirmation step when monitoring for sorbitol-fermenting Bifidobacteria in environmental waters. A year-long sampling survey of a managed reservoir in Massachusetts provided field validation of the proposed methodology for sorbitol-fermenting Bifidobacteria as a human-related source tracking indicator tool.

[1]  I. Resnick,et al.  Quantitative procedure for enumeration of bifidobacteria , 1981, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[3]  D. D. Mara,et al.  Bacteriological methods for distinguishing between human and animal faecal pollution of water: results of fieldwork in Nigeria and Zimbabwe. , 1985, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[4]  M. Rhodes,et al.  Sorbitol‐fermenting bifidobacteria as indicators of diffuse human faecal pollution in estuarine watersheds , 1999, Journal of applied microbiology.

[5]  C. Huh,et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of bifidobacteria. , 1993, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  David J. Goodman,et al.  Personal Communications , 1994, Mobile Communications.

[7]  Henri Beerens.  Detection of Bifidobacteria by Using Propionic Acid as a Selective Agent , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[8]  T. Hazen,et al.  Survival and enumeration of the fecal indicators Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Escherichia coli in a tropical rain forest watershed , 1985, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[9]  D. D. Mara,et al.  Sorbitol-fermenting bifidobacteria as specific indicators of human faecal pollution. , 1983, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[10]  B. Gilpin,et al.  The use of chemical and molecular microbial indicators for faecal source identification. , 2003, Water Science and Technology.

[11]  J. Jofre,et al.  Bacteriophages active against Bacteroides fragilis in sewage-polluted waters , 1987, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[12]  A. Blanch,et al.  A New Selective Medium forBifidobacterium spp , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  Paul Jagals,et al.  Evaluation of indicators for assessment of human and animal faecal pollution of surface run-off , 1995 .

[14]  M. Ellersieck,et al.  Comparison of Ribotyping and Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic-PCR for Identification of Fecal Escherichia coli from Humans and Animals , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[15]  B. Gilpin,et al.  Use of classification and regression tree (CART) analysis with chemical faecal indicators to determine sources of contamination , 2002 .

[16]  Michael J. Sadowsky,et al.  Use of Repetitive DNA Sequences and the PCR To DifferentiateEscherichia coli Isolates from Human and Animal Sources , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[17]  P. Jagals.  Stormwater runoff from typical developed and developing South African urban developments: definitely not for swimming , 1997 .

[18]  J. Jofre,et al.  The effect of reducing agents on the recovery of injured Bifidobacterium cells. , 2002, Journal of microbiological methods.

[19]  L. Sinton,et al.  Distinguishing human from animal faecal contamination in water: A review , 1998 .

[20]  J. Rose,et al.  Geographical Variation in Ribotype Profiles of Escherichia coli Isolates from Humans, Swine, Poultry, Beef, and Dairy Cattle in Florida , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  T. Poiger,et al.  Caffeine, an anthropogenic marker for wastewater comtamination of surface waters. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  I. Rowland,et al.  An assessment of three selective media for bifidobacteria in faeces. , 1996, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[23]  B. Gilpin,et al.  The detection of Bifidobacterium adolescentis by colony hybridization as an indicator of human faecal pollution , 2002, Journal of applied microbiology.

[24]  J. Jofre,et al.  Bacteriophages infecting various bacteroides fragilis strains differ in their capacity to distinguish human from animal faecal pollution , 1997 .

[25]  P. Jagals,et al.  An evaluation of sorbitol-fermenting bifidobacteria as specific indicators of human faecal pollution of environmental water , 1996 .

[26]  J. Jofre,et al.  Comparative Resistance of Phage Isolates of Four Genotypes of F-Specific RNA Bacteriophages to Various Inactivation Processes , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.