Lethal Effect of Electric Fields on Isolated Ventricular Myocytes

Defibrillator-type shocks may cause electric and contractile dysfunction. In this study, we determined the relationship between probability of lethal injury and electric field intensity (E) in isolated rat ventricular myocytes, with emphasis on field orientation and stimulus waveform. This relationship was sigmoidal with irreversible injury for E > 50 V/cm. During both threshold and lethal stimulation, cells were twofold more sensitive to the field when it was applied longitudinally (versus transversally) to the cell major axis. For a given E, the estimated maximum variation of transmembrane potential ( DeltaV max) was greater for longitudinal stimuli, which might account for the greater sensitivity to the field. Cell death, however, occurred at lower maximum DeltaV max values for transversal shocks. This might be explained by a less steep spatial decay of transmembrane potential predicted for transversal stimulation, which would possibly result in occurrence of electroporation in a larger membrane area. For the same stimulus duration, cells were less sensitive to field-induced injury when shocks were biphasic (versus monophasic). Ours results indicate that, although significant myocyte death may occur in the E range expected during clinical defibrillation, biphasic shocks are less likely to produce irreversible cell injury.

[1]  Richard A Gray,et al.  Effects of shock strengths on ventricular defibrillation failure. , 2004, Cardiovascular research.

[2]  J. Bassani,et al.  Contribution of Ca(2+) transporters to relaxation in intact ventricular myocytes from developing rats. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[3]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Stimulation of Spheroidal Cells - The Role of Cell Shape , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  L Tung,et al.  Influence of electrical axis of stimulation on excitation of cardiac muscle cells. , 1991, Circulation research.

[5]  P. Wolf,et al.  Conduction disturbances caused by high current density electric fields. , 1990, Circulation research.

[6]  L Tung,et al.  Electroporation and recovery of cardiac cell membrane with rectangular voltage pulses. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  V Krauthamer,et al.  Calcium dynamics in cultured heart cells exposed to defibrillator-type electric shocks. , 1997, Life sciences.

[8]  Electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes , 1995, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  P. X. Oliveira,et al.  Combining stimulus direction and waveform for optimization of threshold stimulation of isolated ventricular myocytes , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[10]  S. Rush,et al.  Response of cultured myocardial cells to countershock-type electric field stimulation. , 1978, The American journal of physiology.

[11]  Rosana Almada Bassani,et al.  Electric field stimulation of cardiac myocytes during postnatal development , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  I. Efimov,et al.  Electroporation of the heart. , 2005, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  Peter Lipp,et al.  Calcium - a life and death signal , 1998, Nature.

[14]  W. Krassowska,et al.  Modeling electroporation in a single cell. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[15]  Leslie Tung,et al.  Detrimental effects of electrical fields on cardiac muscle , 1996, Proc. IEEE.

[16]  A O Grant,et al.  Asymmetrical electrically induced injury of rabbit ventricular myocytes. , 1995, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[17]  P. Mcneil,et al.  Plasma membrane disruption: repair, prevention, adaptation. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[18]  L. Tung,et al.  Dose-dependent reduction of cardiac transmembrane potential by high-intensity electrical shocks. , 1997, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[19]  J. Ruskin,et al.  Relation between shock-related myocardial injury and defibrillation efficacy of monophasic and biphasic shocks in a canine model. , 1994, Circulation.

[20]  J Teissié,et al.  Time courses of mammalian cell electropermeabilization observed by millisecond imaging of membrane property changes during the pulse. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[21]  R. Maas,et al.  Mechanisms of the contractile effects of 2,3-butanedione-monoxime in the mammalian heart , 1996, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.

[22]  J. Jones,et al.  Decreased defibrillator-induced dysfunction with biphasic rectangular waveforms. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[23]  J. Weaver,et al.  Theory of electroporation: A review , 1996 .

[24]  Martin A Gundersen,et al.  Nanoelectropulse-driven membrane perturbation and small molecule permeabilization , 2006, BMC Cell Biology.

[25]  I R Efimov,et al.  The role of electroporation in defibrillation. , 2000, Circulation research.

[26]  R E Ideker,et al.  Correlation Among Fibrillation, Defibrillation, and Cardiac Pacing , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[27]  D. Bers,et al.  Action potential duration determines sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ reloading in mammalian ventricular myocytes , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Y. Ladilov,et al.  Simulated ischemia increases the susceptibility of rat cardiomyocytes to hypercontracture. , 1997, Circulation research.

[29]  Mojca Pavlin,et al.  Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment , 2003, European Biophysics Journal.

[30]  R E Ideker,et al.  Optical measurements of transmembrane potential changes during electric field stimulation of ventricular cells. , 1993, Circulation research.