A Small‐Diameter NMR Logging Tool for Groundwater Investigations

A small-diameter nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging tool has been developed and field tested at various sites in the United States and Australia. A novel design approach has produced relatively inexpensive, small-diameter probes that can be run in open or PVC-cased boreholes as small as 2 inches in diameter. The complete system, including surface electronics and various downhole probes, has been successfully tested in small-diameter monitoring wells in a range of hydrogeological settings. A variant of the probe that can be deployed by a direct-push machine has also been developed and tested in the field. The new NMR logging tool provides reliable, direct, and high-resolution information that is of importance for groundwater studies. Specifically, the technology provides direct measurement of total water content (total porosity in the saturated zone or moisture content in the unsaturated zone), and estimates of relative pore-size distribution (bound vs. mobile water content) and hydraulic conductivity. The NMR measurements show good agreement with ancillary data from lithologic logs, geophysical logs, and hydrogeologic measurements, and provide valuable information for groundwater investigations.

[1]  P. Lauterbur,et al.  Image Formation by Induced Local Interactions: Examples Employing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 1973, Nature.

[4]  David O. Walsh,et al.  Practical limitations and applications of short dead time surface NMR , 2011 .

[5]  H. Vinegar,et al.  Effective Porosity, Producible Fluid And Permeability In Carbonates From Nmr Logging , 1994 .

[6]  Joseph Lombardo,et al.  Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) , 1998 .

[7]  Donna Post Guillen,et al.  A Survey of Department of Energy – Sponsored Geophysical Research for Shallow Waste Site Characterization , .

[8]  B. Brooke.  The distribution of carbonate eolianite , 2001 .

[9]  David P Gallegos,et al.  A NMR technique for the analysis of pore structure: Determination of continuous pore size distributions , 1988 .

[10]  M. Schulmeister,et al.  Direct-push geochemical profiling for assessment of inorganic chemical heterogeneity in aquifers. , 2004, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[11]  Kleinberg,et al.  Effect of Paramagnetic Ions on NMR Relaxation of Fluids at Solid Surfaces , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series A.

[12]  W. E. Kenyon,et al.  Petrophysical Principles of Applications of NMR Logging , 1997 .

[13]  Marian Hertrich,et al.  Imaging of groundwater with nuclear magnetic resonance , 2008 .

[14]  Mark A. Horsfield,et al.  Transverse relaxation processes in porous sedimentary rock , 1990 .

[15]  Peter G. Fairweather,et al.  CSIRO : water for a healthy country national research flagship , 2008 .

[16]  R. Knight,et al.  Field experiment provides ground truth for surface nuclear magnetic resonance measurement , 2012 .

[17]  W. W. Wood,et al.  Large-Scale Natural Gradient Tracer Test in Sand and Gravel, , 1991 .

[18]  K. Brownstein,et al.  Importance of classical diffusion in NMR studies of water in biological cells , 1979 .

[19]  R. Freedman.  Advances in NMR Logging , 2006 .

[20]  Melvin N. Miller,et al.  The MRIL In Conoco 33-1 An Investigation Of A New Magnetic Resonance Imaging Log , 1991 .

[21]  D. O. Seevers,et al.  A Nuclear Magnetic Method For Determining The Permeability Of Sandstones , 1966 .

[22]  Rosemary Knight,et al.  Use of NMR logging to obtain estimates of hydraulic conductivity in the High Plains aquifer, Nebraska, USA , 2013 .

[23]  W. E. Kenyon,et al.  A Three-Part Study of NMR Longitudinal Relaxation Properties of Water-Saturated Sandstones , 1988 .

[24]  Warren W. Wood,et al.  Large-scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. 1. Experimental design and observed tracer movement , 1991 .

[25]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  Characterizing Hydraulic Conductivity with the Direct‐Push Permeameter , 2007, Ground water.

[26]  Thomas M. Missimer,et al.  Application of advanced borehole geophysical logging to managed aquifer recharge investigations , 2009 .

[27]  Anatoly Legchenko,et al.  A review of the basic principles for proton magnetic resonance sounding measurements , 2002 .

[28]  R. Knight,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation measurements as a means of monitoring iron mineralization processes , 2008 .

[29]  Rosemary Knight,et al.  The effect of pore size and magnetic susceptibility on the surface NMR relaxation parameter T 2 , 2011 .

[30]  James J. Butler,et al.  Hydrogeological Methods for Estimation of Spatial Variations in Hydraulic Conductivity , 2005 .

[31]  Andreas Pohlmeier,et al.  Low-field NMR logging sensor for measuring hydraulic parameters of model soils , 2011 .

[32]  S. Massuel,et al.  Geohydrology of the Tamala Limestone Formation in thePerth Region: Origin and role of secondary porosity , 2012 .

[33]  R. Knight,et al.  NMR relaxation measurements to quantify immiscible organic contaminants in sediments , 2008 .

[34]  A. Timur,et al.  Pulsed Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of Porosity, Movable Fluid, and Permeability of Sandstones , 1969 .

[35]  Rosemary Knight,et al.  A laboratory study of NMR relaxation times and pore coupling in heterogeneous media , 2009 .

[36]  D. J. Bergman,et al.  Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: Petrophysical and Logging Applications , 2011 .

[37]  Robert L. Kleinberg,et al.  NMR well logging at Schlumberger , 2001 .

[38]  David O. Walsh,et al.  Multi-channel surface NMR instrumentation and software for 1D/2D groundwater investigations , 2008 .

[39]  B. W. Gamson,et al.  Nuclear Magnetism Logging Field Results , 1964 .