Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research: Executive summary of the report of AAPM Research Committee Task Group 195.

The use of Monte Carlo simulations in diagnostic medical imaging research is widespread due to its flexibility and ability to estimate quantities that are challenging to measure empirically. However, any new Monte Carlo simulation code needs to be validated before it can be used reliably. The type and degree of validation required depends on the goals of the research project, but, typically, such validation involves either comparison of simulation results to physical measurements or to previously published results obtained with established Monte Carlo codes. The former is complicated due to nuances of experimental conditions and uncertainty, while the latter is challenging due to typical graphical presentation and lack of simulation details in previous publications. In addition, entering the field of Monte Carlo simulations in general involves a steep learning curve. It is not a simple task to learn how to program and interpret a Monte Carlo simulation, even when using one of the publicly available code packages. This Task Group report provides a common reference for benchmarking Monte Carlo simulations across a range of Monte Carlo codes and simulation scenarios. In the report, all simulation conditions are provided for six different Monte Carlo simulation cases that involve common x-ray based imaging research areas. The results obtained for the six cases using four publicly available Monte Carlo software packages are included in tabular form. In addition to a full description of all simulation conditions and results, a discussion and comparison of results among the Monte Carlo packages and the lessons learned during the compilation of these results are included. This abridged version of the report includes only an introductory description of the six cases and a brief example of the results of one of the cases. This work provides an investigator the necessary information to benchmark his/her Monte Carlo simulation software against the reference cases included here before performing his/her own novel research. In addition, an investigator entering the field of Monte Carlo simulations can use these descriptions and results as a self-teaching tool to ensure that he/she is able to perform a specific simulation correctly. Finally, educators can assign these cases as learning projects as part of course objectives or training programs.

[1]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[2]  S. Donadio,et al.  Precision validation of Geant4 electromagnetic physics , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[3]  I. Kawrakow,et al.  The EGSnrc Code System: Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport , 2016 .

[4]  J. Boone,et al.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. , 1999, Radiology.

[5]  José M. Fernández-Varea,et al.  FAST SAMPLING ALGORITHM FOR THE SIMULATION OF PHOTON COMPTON SCATTERING , 1996 .

[6]  I. Kawrakow,et al.  History by history statistical estimators in the BEAM code system. , 2002, Medical physics.

[7]  Francesc Salvat,et al.  Calculations of inner-shell ionization by electron impact with the distorted-wave and plane-wave Born approximations , 2008 .

[8]  I. Kawrakow,et al.  Large efficiency improvements in BEAMnrc using directional bremsstrahlung splitting. , 2004, Medical physics.

[9]  James A. Scott.  Photon, Electron, Proton and Neutron Interaction Data for Body Tissues ICRU Report 46. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, 1992, $40.00 , 1993 .

[10]  D W O Rogers,et al.  Efficiency improvements of x-ray simulations in EGSnrc user-codes using bremsstrahlung cross-section enhancement (BCSE). , 2007, Medical physics.

[11]  J. Sempau,et al.  A PENELOPE-based system for the automated Monte Carlo simulation of clinacs and voxelized geometries-application to far-from-axis fields. , 2011, Medical physics.

[12]  G. Anton,et al.  Comparison of recent experimental data with Monte Carlo tools such as RoSi, Geant4 and Penelope , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[13]  S. Evans.  Catalogue of Diagnostic X-Ray Spectra and Other Data , 1998 .

[14]  J. Sempau,et al.  PENELOPE-2006: A Code System for Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport , 2009 .

[15]  S. Incerti,et al.  Geant4 developments and applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[16]  Klemens Zink,et al.  GMctdospp: Description and validation of a CT dose calculation system. , 2015, Medical physics.

[17]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  Spiral computed tomography phase-space source model in the BEAMnrc/EGSnrc Monte Carlo system: implementation and validation. , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  W D McDavid,et al.  Modification and benchmarking of MCNP for low-energy tungsten spectra. , 2000, Medical physics.

[19]  M. Desco,et al.  PeneloPET, a Monte Carlo PET simulation tool based on PENELOPE: features and validation , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[20]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[21]  Matej Batic,et al.  Photon Elastic Scattering Simulation: Validation and Improvements to Geant4 , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[22]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Atomic form factors, incoherent scattering functions, and photon scattering cross sections , 1975 .

[23]  J. Baró,et al.  An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of coupled electron-photon transport , 1997 .

[24]  Steffen Hauf,et al.  Validation of Compton scattering Monte Carlo simulation models , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).

[25]  E. W. Shrigley.  Medical Physics , 1944, British medical journal.

[26]  Roland Ribberfors,et al.  Relationship of the relativistic Compton cross section to the momentum distribution of bound electron states , 1975 .

[27]  J. Sempau,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of electron beams from an accelerator head using PENELOPE , 2001, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[28]  César Marques Salgado,et al.  Determination of HPGe detector response using MCNP5 for 20-150 keV X-rays. , 2006, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[29]  I. Kawrakow.  Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version. , 2000, Medical physics.

[30]  J. B. Mann,et al.  Hartree-Fock Compton profiles for the elements , 1975 .

[31]  E. S. M. Ali,et al.  Accurate unfolding of photon spectra of clinical linear accelerators using transmission measurements , 2012 .

[32]  L. Kochian.  Author to whom correspondence should be addressed , 2006 .

[33]  Iwan Kawrakow,et al.  Efficient x-ray tube simulations. , 2006, Medical physics.

[34]  I Buvat,et al.  Validation of the GATE Monte Carlo simulation platform for modelling a CsI(Tl) scintillation camera dedicated to small-animal imaging , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  C. Ma,et al.  BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. , 1995, Medical physics.