Probabilistic Performance Bounds for Randomized Sensor Selection in Kalman Filtering

We consider the problem of randomly choosing the sensors of a linear time-invariant dynamical system subject to process and measurement noise. Each sensor is sampled independently and from the same distribution for the purpose of state estimation by Kalman filtering. Due to our randomized sampling procedure, the estimation error covariance cannot be bounded in a deterministic sense. Using tools from random matrix theory, we derive probabilistic bounds on the steady-state estimation error covariance in the semi-definite sense for an arbitrary sampling distribution. Our bounds are functions of several tunable parameters of interest, such as the number of sampled sensors and the likelihood that our bounds hold. We indirectly improve the performance of our Kalman filter for the maximum eigenvalue metric by finding the optimal sampling distribution. By minimizing the maximum eigenvalue of the upper bound, we are able to minimize the maximum eigenvalue of the steady-state estimation error covariance, the actual metric of interest. We identify the subset of sensors to sample with high frequency through the optimal sampling distribution. We illustrate our findings through several insightful simulations and comparisons with multiple sampling policies.

[1]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalities , 2015, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[2]  S. R. Searle,et al.  On Deriving the Inverse of a Sum of Matrices , 1981 .

[3]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[4]  Fuzhen Zhang The Schur complement and its applications , 2005 .

[5]  Xiaobo Tan,et al.  Randomized Sensor Selection for Nonlinear Systems With Application to Target Localization , 2019, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[6]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[7]  Chao Liu,et al.  A new smart traffic monitoring method using embedded cement-based piezoelectric sensors , 2015 .

[8]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  On a stochastic sensor selection algorithm with applications in sensor scheduling and sensor coverage , 2006, Autom..

[9]  J. Jensen Sur les fonctions convexes et les inégalités entre les valeurs moyennes , 1906 .

[10]  Marc M. J. van de Wal,et al.  A review of methods for input/output selection , 2001, Autom..

[11]  John Lygeros,et al.  On Submodularity and Controllability in Complex Dynamical Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[12]  Ufuk Topcu,et al.  A Randomized Greedy Algorithm for Near-Optimal Sensor Scheduling in Large-Scale Sensor Networks , 2017, 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC).

[13]  H. Weber,et al.  Analysis and optimization of certain qualities of controllability and observability for linear dynamical systems , 1972 .

[14]  Nader Motee,et al.  Measurable Observations for Network Observability , 2019, 2019 American Control Conference (ACC).

[15]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[16]  M. Wicks,et al.  Sums of Matrix-Valued Random Variables , 2014 .

[17]  Yong Yang,et al.  A Sensor-cyber Network Testbed for Plume Detection, Identification, and Tracking , 2007, 2007 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[18]  Bruno Sinopoli,et al.  Sensor selection strategies for state estimation in energy constrained wireless sensor networks , 2011, Autom..

[19]  Girish Chowdhary,et al.  Sensor Selection via Observability Analysis in Feature Space , 2018, 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC).

[20]  Shreyas Sundaram,et al.  Sensor selection for Kalman filtering of linear dynamical systems: Complexity, limitations and greedy algorithms , 2017, Autom..

[21]  Soummya Kar,et al.  Minimum cost input/output design for large-scale linear structural systems , 2014, Autom..

[22]  Shaunak D. Bopardikar,et al.  A randomized approach to sensor placement with observability assurance , 2021, Autom..

[23]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Sensor placement for optimal Kalman filtering: Fundamental limits, submodularity, and algorithms , 2015, 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

[24]  Stephen L. Smith,et al.  Submodularity and greedy algorithms in sensor scheduling for linear dynamical systems , 2015, Autom..