Theoretical Linguistics Meets Pedagogical Practice: Pronominal Subject Use in Spanish as a Second Language

This article attempts to highlight the importance of theoretical linguistics and empirical cognitive linguistics studies for the practical teaching of Spanish as a second language. Looking at the domain of subject pronominal use as an example, I endeavor to show how formal linguistics can be useful to language instructors. This is a significant enterprise since language instructors could benefit from both a better understanding of the linguistic properties of the languages they teach and what psycholinguistic studies have revealed about the nature of adult language learning in general.

[1]  Almeida Jacqueline Toribio.  Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish , 2000 .

[2]  J. Rothman,et al.  Input type and parameter resetting: Is naturalistic input necessary? , 2007 .

[3]  Ana Teresa Pérez-Leroux,et al.  Null anaphora in Spanish second language acquisition: probabilistic versus generative approaches , 1999 .

[4]  Michael H. Long.  Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis , 2005 .

[5]  Jason Rothman,et al.  The Syntax of Pronominal Subjects in L2 Spanish: Comparing Two L2 Populations with Different Exposure , 2007 .

[6]  Roumyana Slabakova,et al.  Meaning in the second language , 2008 .

[7]  T. Wasow,et al.  Grammatical theory , 1989 .

[8]  Jason Rothman,et al.  Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax–pragmatics interface , 2009 .

[9]  William O'Grady,et al.  Syntactic Carpentry: An Emergentist Approach to Syntax , 2005 .

[10]  J. Liceras.  La lingüistica y el análisis de los sistemas no nativos , 1995 .

[11]  Lydia White,et al.  Missing Surface Inflection or Impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement , 2000 .

[12]  William Snyder,et al.  Child Language: The Parametric Approach , 2007 .

[13]  Leonie Cornips,et al.  Syntax and variation : reconciling the biological and the social , 2005 .

[14]  M. Tomasello.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2003 .

[15]  J. Grinstead.  Subjects and Interface Delay in Child Spanish and Catalan , 2004 .

[16]  Bill VanPatten,et al.  Some Verbs Are More Perfect than Others: Why Learners Have Difficulty with ser and estar and What It Means for Instruction , 2010 .

[17]  Silvina Andrea Montrul,et al.  Beyond the syntax of the Null Subject Parameter , 2006 .

[18]  William C. Ritchie,et al.  Handbook of Second Language Acquisition , 1998 .

[19]  Joseph Collentine,et al.  The Development of Complex Syntax and Mood- Selection Abilities by Intermediate-Level Learners of Spanish , 1995 .

[20]  Donna Lardiere,et al.  Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study , 2006 .

[21]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Syntactic optionality at interfaces , 2005 .

[22]  Silvina Andrea Montrul,et al.  The acquisition of Spanish , 2004 .

[23]  Juana M. Liceras.  Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition: On some properties of the “pro-drop” parameter: looking for missing subjects in non-native Spanish , 1989 .

[24]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition: Frontmatter , 1989 .

[25]  A. Sorace,et al.  Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian , 2007 .

[26]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  The new comparative syntax , 2000 .

[27]  Vincent Torrens,et al.  The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages , 2006 .

[28]  Michael H. Long.  Maturational Constraints on Language Development , 1990, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[29]  J. Rothman,et al.  Poverty-of-the-Stimulus and SLA Epistemology: Considering L2 Knowledge of Aspectual Phrasal Semantics , 2008 .

[30]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian , 2006 .

[31]  Robert W. Bley-Vroman.  THE COMPARATIVE FALLACY IN INTERLANGUAGE STUDIES: THE CASE OF SYSTEMATICITY1 , 1983 .

[32]  Joseph Collentine.  The Acquisition and Teaching of the Spanish Subjunctive: An Update on Current Findings , 2010 .

[33]  J. Rothman.  How Pragmatically Odd! Interface Delays and Pronominal Subject Distribution in L2 Spanish , 2008 .

[34]  Noam Chomsky.  Of Minds and Language , 2007, Biolinguistics.

[35]  Paola E. Dussias.  SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION IN L2 LEARNERS , 2003, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[36]  E. Anagnostopoulou,et al.  Parametrizing Agr: Word Order, V-Movement and Epp-Checking , 1998 .

[37]  Miren Hodgson,et al.  THE ACQUISITION OF SPANISH: MORPHOSYNTACTIC DEVELOPMENT IN MONOLINGUAL AND BILINGUAL L1 ACQUISITION AND ADULT L2 ACQUISITION , 2006, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[38]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[39]  Kevin R. Gregg.  SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[40]  M. Paradis.  A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism , 2004 .

[41]  J. Rothman,et al.  On parameter clustering and resetting the null-subject parameter in L2 spanish: implication and observations , 2007 .

[42]  M. Picallo.  On the Extended Projection Principle and null expletive subjects , 1998 .

[43]  Elena Valenzuela,et al.  Eventive and stative passives in Spanish L2 acquisition: A matter of aspect* , 2008, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[44]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  A PARAMETRIC APPROACH TO COMPARATIVE SYNTAX: PROPERTIES OF THE PRONOMINAL SYSTEM , 1993 .