High-throughput computational screening of nanoporous adsorbents for CO2 capture from natural gas

With the growth of natural gas as an energy source, upgrading CO2-contaminated supplies has become increasingly important. Here we develop a single metric that captures how well an adsorbent performs the separation of CH4 and CO2, and we then use this metric to computationally screen tens of thousands of all-silica zeolites. We show that the most important predictors of separation performance are the CO2 heat of adsorption (Qst,CO2) and the CO2 saturation loading capacity. We find that a higher-performing material results when the absolute value of the CH4 heat of adsorption (Qst,CH4) is decreased independently of Qst,CO2, but a correlation that exists between Qst,CH4 and Qst,CO2 in all-silica zeolites leads to incongruity between the objectives of optimizing Qst,CO2 and minimizing Qst,CH4, rendering Qst,CH4 nonpredictive of separation performance. We also conduct a large-scale analysis of ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) by comparing results obtained using directly-generated mixture isotherms to those obtained using IAST; IAST appears adequate for the purposes of establishing performance trends and structure–property relationships in a high-throughput manner, but it must be tested for validity when analyzing individual adsorbents in detail since it can produce significant errors for materials in which there is site segregation of the adsorbate species.

[1]  Maciej Haranczyk,et al.  What Are the Best Materials To Separate a Xenon/Krypton Mixture? , 2015 .

[2]  Diego A. Gómez-Gualdrón,et al.  The materials genome in action: identifying the performance limits for methane storage , 2015 .

[3]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Discovery of novel zeolites for natural gas purification through combined material screening and process optimization , 2014 .

[4]  Mohammad Amanullah,et al.  CO2 capture from dry flue gas by vacuum swing adsorption: A pilot plant study , 2014 .

[5]  Li-Chiang Lin,et al.  Optimizing nanoporous materials for gas storage. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[6]  E. Kort,et al.  Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems , 2014, Science.

[7]  Eric L. First,et al.  Cost-effective CO2 capture based on in silico screening of zeolites and process optimization. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[8]  Maciej Haranczyk,et al.  High accuracy geometric analysis of crystalline porous materials , 2013 .

[9]  B. Smit,et al.  Evaluating mixture adsorption models using molecular simulation , 2013 .

[10]  Paul A. Webley,et al.  A new simplified pressure/vacuum swing adsorption model for rapid adsorbent screening for CO2 capture applications , 2013 .

[11]  Li-Chiang Lin,et al.  Large-scale screening of zeolite structures for CO2 membrane separations. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  A. Maiti,et al.  New materials for methane capture from dilute and medium-concentration sources , 2013, Nature Communications.

[13]  Randall Q. Snurr,et al.  Large-Scale Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship (QSPR) Analysis of Methane Storage in Metal–Organic Frameworks , 2013 .

[14]  C. Jallut,et al.  Quantification of the confinement effect in microporous materials. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[15]  C. Serre,et al.  An adsorbent performance indicator as a first step evaluation of novel sorbents for gas separations: application to metal-organic frameworks. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[16]  Randall Q. Snurr,et al.  Structure–property relationships of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture , 2012 .

[17]  Li-Chiang Lin,et al.  Predicting large CO2 adsorption in aluminosilicate zeolites for postcombustion carbon dioxide capture. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  Chongli Zhong,et al.  Revealing the structure-property relationships of metal-organic frameworks for CO2 capture from flue gas. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[19]  Abhoyjit S Bhown,et al.  In silico screening of carbon-capture materials. , 2012, Nature materials.

[20]  Douglas Hilleman,et al.  Power Plant Cycling Costs , 2012 .

[21]  Jihan Kim,et al.  Efficient Monte Carlo Simulations of Gas Molecules Inside Porous Materials. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[22]  C. Nieto‐Draghi,et al.  Prediction of thermodynamic properties of adsorbed gases in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks , 2012 .

[23]  Richard L. Martin,et al.  High-Throughput Characterization of Porous Materials Using Graphics Processing Units. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  T. Düren,et al.  Evaluation of Ideal Adsorbed Solution Theory as a Tool for the Design of Metal−Organic Framework Materials , 2012 .

[25]  Sankar Nair,et al.  Finding MOFs for highly selective CO2/N2 adsorption using materials screening based on efficient assignment of atomic point charges. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[26]  Maciej Haranczyk,et al.  Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials , 2012 .

[27]  N. Speybroeck Classification and regression trees , 2012, International Journal of Public Health.

[28]  Randall Q Snurr,et al.  Development and evaluation of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[29]  Michael W Deem,et al.  A database of new zeolite-like materials. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[30]  W. Zhou,et al.  Carbon capture in metal–organic frameworks—a comparative study , 2011 .

[31]  R. Krishna,et al.  In silico screening of metal-organic frameworks in separation applications. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[32]  A. Ingraffea,et al.  Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations , 2011 .

[33]  Sankar Nair,et al.  Pore size analysis of >250,000 hypothetical zeolites. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[34]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[35]  Claude Mirodatos,et al.  Natural gas treating by selective adsorption: Material science and chemical engineering interplay , 2009 .

[36]  D. Sholl,et al.  Carbon dioxide and methane transport in DDR zeolite: insights from molecular simulations into carbon dioxide separations in small pore zeolites. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[37]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Segregation effects in adsorption of CO2-containing mixtures and their consequences for separation selectivities in cage-type zeolites , 2008 .

[38]  L. Broadbelt,et al.  Separation of CO2 from CH4 using mixed-ligand metal-organic frameworks. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[39]  R. Krishna,et al.  A computational study of CO2, N2, and CH4 adsorption in zeolites , 2007 .

[40]  D. Sholl,et al.  Examining the accuracy of ideal adsorbed solution theory without curve-fitting using transition matrix Monte Carlo simulations. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[41]  S. Sandler,et al.  Storage and separation of CO2 and CH4 in silicalite, C168 schwarzite, and IRMOF-1: a comparative study from Monte Carlo simulation. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[42]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Optimum conditions for adsorptive storage. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[43]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[44]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Adsorption Equilibrium of Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen on Zeolite 13X at High Pressures , 2004 .

[45]  R. Snurr,et al.  Effects of molecular siting and adsorbent heterogeneity on the ideality of adsorption equilibria. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[46]  D. Sholl,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of single- and binary-component adsorption of CO2, N2, and H2 in zeolite Na-4A , 2003 .

[47]  David S. Sholl,et al.  Atomistic Simulations of CO2 and N2 Adsorption in Silica Zeolites: The Impact of Pore Size and Shape† , 2002 .

[48]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Heat capacities, third-law entropies and thermodynamic functions of SiO2molecular sieves fromT = 0 K to 400 K , 2002 .

[49]  R. T. Yang,et al.  A SIMPLE PARAMETER FOR SELECTING AN ADSORBENT FOR GAS SEPARATION BY PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION , 2001 .

[50]  A. Myers,et al.  Molecular simulation of adsorption: Gibbs dividing surface and comparison with experiment , 2001 .

[51]  J. Gmehling,et al.  Measurement and prediction of binary adsorption equilibria of vapors on dealuminated Y-zeolites (DAY) , 1998 .

[52]  Berend Smit,et al.  Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications , 1996 .

[53]  D. Peng,et al.  A New Two-Constant Equation of State , 1976 .

[54]  Hiroshi Akima,et al.  A New Method of Interpolation and Smooth Curve Fitting Based on Local Procedures , 1970, JACM.

[55]  Jihan Kim,et al.  High-throughput computational screening of nanoporous adsorbents for CO2 capture from natural gas , 2016 .

[56]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[57]  L. Breiman Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[58]  Alan L. Myers,et al.  Thermodynamics of mixed‐gas adsorption , 1965 .

[59]  J. Smith,et al.  Introduction to chemical engineering thermodynamics , 1949 .