Simulation of laboratory assignments to support students’ learning of introductory inorganic chemistry

The goal of this investigation was to elucidate undergraduate chemistry students’ response to the SimuLab computer-based learning environment, which simulates a 20 hours laboratory assignment. The SimuLab is a cognitive tool designed to help students to acquire experimental and analytical skills on the basis of a classical qualitative and quantitative analysis scheme and to develop their ability to interpret experimental results. Consistent with the intentions behind the design, students seemed to acknowledge the learning potential of the simulation program. They found it motivating and creating attention towards the practical application of declarative knowledge. We also found SimuLab to support students in the accomplishment of cognitive tasks and to enhance their skills in the context of the investigation. [Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2006, 7 (4), 266-279]

[1]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  NEW APPROACHES: The students' attitude and cognition change to a physics laboratory , 1998 .

[2]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[3]  I. Langmuir.  Phenomena, atoms and molecules , 1950 .

[4]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Training in Self-Explanation and Self-Regulation Strategies: Investigating the Effects of Knowledge Acquisition Activities on Problem Solving , 1995 .

[5]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[6]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[7]  Alex H. Johnstone.  THE NATURE OF CHEMISTRY , 1999 .

[8]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld , 2001 .

[9]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Managing Cognitive Load--Recent Trends in Cognitive Load Theory. Commentary. , 2002 .

[10]  Richard Swan,et al.  The Virtual ChemLab Project: A Realistic and Sophisticated Simulation of Inorganic Qualitative Analysis , 2004 .

[11]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[12]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Cognitive Tools for Assessment and Learning in a High Information Flow Environment , 1998 .

[14]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Jens Josephsen,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL TRAINING FOR CHEMISTRY STUDENTS: DOES EXPERIMENTAL EXPERIENCE FROM THE GENERAL SCIENCES CONTRIBUTE? , 2003 .

[16]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[17]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[18]  H A Simon,et al.  How Big Is a Chunk? , 1974, Science.

[19]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  An information processing model of learning: Its application to an undergraduate laboratory course in chemistry , 1994 .

[20]  P. Kirschner,et al.  External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load , 2002 .