Uncertainty in timber assortment estimates predicted from forest inventory data

Uncertainty factors related to inventory methodologies and forest-planning simulation computings in the estimation of logging outturn assortment volumes and values were examined. The uncertainty factors investigated were (1) forest inventory errors, (2) errors in generated stem distribution, (3) effects of generated stem distribution errors on the simulation of thinnings and (iv) errors related to the prediction of stem form and simulation of bucking. Regarding inventory errors, standwise field inventory (SWFI) was compared with area-based airborne laser scanning (ALS) and aerial photography inventorying. Our research area, Evo, is located in southern Finland. In all, 31 logging sites (12 clear-cutting and 19 thinning sites) measured by logging machine in winter 2008 were used as field reference data. The results showed that the most significant source of error in the prediction of clear-cutting assortment outturns was inventory error. Errors related to stem-form prediction and simulated bucking as well as generation of stem distributions also cause uncertainty. The bias and root-mean-squared error (RMSE) of inventory errors varied between −11.4 and 21.6 m3/ha and 6.8 and 40.5 m3/ha, respectively, depending on the assortment and inventory methodology. The effect of forest inventory errors on the value of logging outturn in clear-cuttings was 29.1% (SWFI) and 24.7% (ALS). The respective RMSE values related to thinnings were 41.1 and 42%. The generation of stem distribution series using mean characteristics led to an RMSE of 1.3 to 2.7 m3/ha and a bias of −1.2 to 0.6 m3/ha in the volume of all assortments. Prediction of stem form and simulation of bucking led to a relative bias of −0.28 to 0.00 m3 in predicted sawtimber volume. Errors related to pulpwood volumes were −0.4 m3 to 0.21 m3.

[1]  A. Haara The uncertainty of forest management planning data in Finnish non-industrial private forestry , 2005 .

[2]  Jori Uusitalo,et al.  The effect of two bucking methods on Scots pine lumber quality , 2004 .

[3]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Estimation of diameter and basal area distributions in coniferous forest by means of airborne laser scanner data , 2004 .

[4]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Estimation of stem volume using laser scanning-based canopy height metrics , 2006 .

[5]  S. Popescu,et al.  Measuring individual tree crown diameter with lidar and assessing its influence on estimating forest volume and biomass , 2003 .

[6]  M. Maltamo,et al.  The k-MSN method for the prediction of species-specific stand attributes using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs , 2007 .

[7]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Effect of tree-level airborne laser-scanning measurement accuracy on the timing and expected value of harvest decisions , 2009, European Journal of Forest Research.

[8]  M. Naesberg,et al.  Mathematical programming models for optimal log bucking , 1985 .

[9]  E. Næsset Estimating timber volume of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 1997 .

[10]  J. Siipilehto A comparison of two parameter prediction methods for stand structure in Finland , 2000 .

[11]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Comparing stand inventories for large areas based on photo-interpretation and laser scanning by means of cost-plus-loss analyses , 2004 .

[12]  D. A. Hill,et al.  Combined high-density lidar and multispectral imagery for individual tree crown analysis , 2003 .

[13]  Matti Maltamo,et al.  Application of Most Similar Neighbor Inference for Estimating Marked Stand Characteristics Using Harvester and Inventory Generated Stem Databases , 2001 .

[14]  Matti Maltamo,et al.  Use of the Weibull function in estimating the basal area dbh-distribution. , 1989 .

[15]  Laura Koskela,et al.  On the analysis of cubic smoothing spline-based stem curve prediction for forest harvesters , 2006 .

[16]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[17]  E. Tomppo,et al.  Satellite image-based national forest inventory of finland for publication in the igarss'91 digest , 1991, [Proceedings] IGARSS'91 Remote Sensing: Global Monitoring for Earth Management.

[18]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[19]  Jari Varjo Latvan hukkaosan pituusmallit männylle, kuuselle ja koivulle metsurimittausta varten. , 1995 .

[20]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Kuvioittaisen arvioinnin harhan muodostuminen , 1970 .

[21]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Estimation of species-specific diameter distributions using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs , 2008 .

[22]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Estimation of timber volume and stem density based on scanning laser altimetry and expected tree size distribution functions , 2004 .

[23]  K. Korhonen,et al.  Kuvioittaisen arvioinnin luotettavuus , 1970 .

[24]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[25]  Risto Ojansuu Prediction of Scots pine increment using a multivariate variance component model. , 1993 .

[26]  Tron Eid,et al.  Use of uncertain inventory data in forestry scenario models and consequential incorrect harvest decisions. , 2000 .

[27]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  DETECTING AND ESTIMATING ATTRIBUTES FOR SINGLE TREES USING LASER SCANNER , 2006 .

[28]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Performance of percentile based diameter distribution prediction and Weibull method in independent data sets , 2000 .

[29]  R. M. Haralick,et al.  Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics , 1973 .

[30]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner , 2002 .

[31]  M.,et al.  Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture , 2022 .

[32]  Jouni Siipilehto,et al.  Improving the Accuracy of Predicted Basal-Area Diameter Distribution in Advanced Stands by Determining Stem Number , 1999 .

[33]  Antti Mäkinen,et al.  SIMO: An adaptable simulation framework for multiscale forest resource data , 2009 .

[34]  Johan Holmgren,et al.  Estimation of forest variables using airborne laser scanning , 2003 .

[35]  Simo Poso,et al.  Kuvioittaisen arvioimismenetelmän perusteita. , 1983 .

[36]  Sakari Tuominen,et al.  Performance of airborne laser scanning- and aerial photograph-based statistical and textural features in forest variable estimation , 2008 .

[37]  J. Lappi Mixed linear models for analyzing and predicting stem form variation of Scots pine , 1986 .

[38]  Markus Holopainen,et al.  Effect of data acquisition accuracy on timing of stand harvests and expected net present value. , 2006 .

[39]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Methods based on k-nearest neighbor regression in the prediction of basal area diameter distribution , 1998 .

[40]  Jouko Laasasenaho Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch [Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula, Betula pubescens] , 1982 .

[41]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Comparison of basal area and stem frequency diameter distribution modelling using airborne laser scanner data and calibration estimation , 2007 .

[42]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Estimating species-specific diameter distributions and saw log recoveries of boreal forests from airborne laser scanning data and aerial photographs : a distribution-based approach , 2008 .

[43]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..