Brain literate: making neuroscience accessible to a wider audience of undergraduates.

The ability to critically evaluate neuroscientific findings is a skill that is rapidly becoming important in non-science professions. As neuroscience research is increasingly being used in law, business, education, and politics, it becomes imperative to educate future leaders in all areas of society about the brain. Undergraduate general education courses are an ideal way to expose students to issues of critical importance, but non-science students may avoid taking a neuroscience course because of the perception that neuroscience is more challenging than other science courses. A recently developed general education cluster course at UCLA aims to make neuroscience more palatable to undergraduates by pairing neuroscientific concepts with philosophy and history, and by building a learning community that supports the development of core academic skills and intellectual growth over the course of a year. This study examined the extent to which the course was successful in delivering neuroscience education to a broader undergraduate community. The results indicate that a majority of students in the course mastered the basics of the discipline regardless of their major. Furthermore, 77% of the non-life science majors (approximately two-thirds of students in the course) indicated that they would not have taken an undergraduate neuroscience course if this one was not offered. The findings also demonstrate that the course helped students develop core academic skills and improved their ability to think critically about current events in neuroscience. Faculty reported that teaching the course was highly rewarding and did not require an inordinate amount of time.

[1]  S. Ackerman,et al.  The Dana Alliance for Brain Initiatives , 2003 .

[2]  Eric P. Wiertelak,et al.  Undergraduate Neuroscience Education: Blueprints for the 21st Century , 2008, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[3]  Leopoldo J. Cabassa,et al.  Public Stigma of Mental Illness in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review , 2013, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[4]  Olga V. Demler,et al.  Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. , 2005, Archives of general psychiatry.

[5]  George D. Kuh High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter , 2008 .

[6]  M. Birkett,et al.  Decreasing Neuroscience Anxiety in an Introductory Neuroscience Course: An Analysis Using Data from a Modified Science Anxiety Scale , 2011, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Kerchner,et al.  Identifying and Using ‘Core Competencies’ to Help Design and Assess Undergraduate Neuroscience Curricula , 2012, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[8]  K. Merikangas,et al.  Lifetime prevalence and age of onset of psychiatric disorders: recall 4 years later. , 1988, Journal of psychiatric research.

[9]  Judy Illes,et al.  Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.