Are you as good as me at telling a story? Individual differences in interpersonal reality monitoring

We tested whether someone's ability to tell a good story, in terms of the Reality Monitoring (RM) tool, affects the way s/he judges the stories told by others. Forty participants (undergraduate students) wrote down two statements – one about activities they did 30 minutes ago, and the other about a past event. Subsequently, they rated the quality of a target statement written by someone else. We found that the tendency to provide a not so detailed or a very detailed statement was stable across the two statements the participants wrote. Furthermore, this tendency affected how they judged the target statements: The richer a participant's statements were compared to the target statement, the more critical the participant was in judging the target statement. These findings imply that RM is subject to biases which are related to individual differences. We discuss the implications of these findings for applying the RM lie detection tool in the field.

[1]  Galit Nahari,et al.  Does the truth come out in the writing? Scan as a lie detection tool. , 2012, Law and human behavior.

[2]  D. Lykken.  The GSR in the detection of guilt. , 1959 .

[3]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Interpersonal Reality Monitoring: Judging the Sources of Other People's Memories , 1998 .

[4]  Stefanie J. Sharman,et al.  Should i believe this? Reality monitoring of accounts of self-experienced and invented recent and distant autobiographical events , 2006 .

[5]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Reality Monitoring , 2005 .

[6]  Ray Bull,et al.  Lay Persons' and Police Officers' Beliefs Regarding Deceptive Behaviour , 1996 .

[7]  David T. Lykken,et al.  A Tremor in the Blood: Uses and Abuses of the Lie Detector , 1980 .

[8]  J. Brigham,et al.  The usefulness of the criteria-based content analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations: A critical review. , 1997 .

[9]  Siegfried L. Sporer,et al.  The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts: Reality monitoring and detection of deception , 2004 .

[10]  H. Merckelbach,et al.  Fantasy proneness as a confounder of verbal lie detection tools , 2010 .

[11]  Leif A. Strömwall,et al.  Children recalling an event repeatedly: Effects on RM and CBCA scores , 2006 .

[12]  H. Merckelbach.  Telling a good story: Fantasy proneness and the quality of fabricated memories , 2004 .

[13]  A. Vrij.  Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities , 2008 .

[14]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Memory and Reality , 2022 .

[15]  A. Vrij.  Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A Qualitative Review of the First 37 Studies. , 2005 .

[16]  E F Loftus,et al.  Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: the power of (a few) minor details. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  David T. Lykken,et al.  The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking. , 1960 .

[18]  I. Nachson,et al.  Credibility judgments of narratives: language, plausibility, and absorption. , 2010, The American journal of psychology.

[19]  Ray Bull,et al.  Stereotypical Verbal and Nonverbal Responses While Deceiving Others , 2001 .

[20]  D. Faust,et al.  The detection of deception. , 1995, Neurologic clinics.

[21]  G. Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Standardization within individuals: a simple method to neutralize individual differences in skin conductance. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[22]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Cues to deception. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Maria Hartwig,et al.  The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts: Practitioners' beliefs about deception , 2004 .

[24]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  The less travelled road to truth: verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self‐experienced events , 1997 .

[25]  P. Granhag,et al.  Effects of preconceptions on deception detection and new answers to why lie-catchers often fail , 2000 .

[26]  B. C. Lacey,et al.  Verification and extension of the principle of autonomic response-stereotypy. , 1958, The American journal of psychology.

[27]  David Charlton,et al.  Why Experts Make Errors , 2006 .

[28]  J. Glicksohn.  Rating the Incidence of an Altered State of Consciousness as a Function of the Rater's Own Absorption Score , 1994 .

[29]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: a review of the empirical evidence , 2005 .

[30]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.