Pore structure characterization of asymmetric membranes: Non-destructive characterization of porosity and tortuosity

Abstract Internal concentration polarization (ICP) in osmotic processes is largely influenced by the porous structure of the support layer of the membrane. Recent publications on osmotic separations have described a ‘structural parameter’, S (function of the thickness, tortuosity, and porosity of the support layer), that represents the support layer's contribution to the overall mass transfer resistance during osmosis. To date, S has only been calculated as a fitted parameter in a model that requires experimental flux measurements. Such a method is inaccurate since the models fail to account for all of the different mass transfer phenomena. An alternative is to characterize the thickness, tortuosity, and porosity independently and thus calculate the actual value of the structural parameter. However, for soft materials like porous membranes, no standard methods have been established for measuring porosity and tortuosity. In this study, we propose the use of X-ray microscopy (XRM) for determining the structural parameter of thin film composite (TFC) membrane support layers. The S value could be calculated from the XRM images and was compared to the results obtained from more conventional mercury intrusion porosimetry as well as an existing model used with empirical data. Substantial differences between the values obtained from the different techniques indicated the need to revise the traditional approaches of characterizing membrane structures.

[1]  Seetha S Manickam,et al.  Characterization of polymeric nonwovens using porosimetry, porometry and X-ray computed tomography , 2012 .

[2]  J. Caro,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1998 .

[3]  E. Hoek,et al.  Impacts of Operating Conditions and Solution Chemistry on Osmotic Membrane Structure and Performance. , 2012, Desalination.

[4]  W. Chiu,et al.  Non invasive, multiscale 3D X-Ray characterization of porous functional composites and membranes, with resolution from MM to sub 50 NM , 2009 .

[5]  E. Wachsman,et al.  Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Porous LSCF Cathodes , 2007 .

[6]  S. C. Carniglia Construction of the tortuosity factor from porosimetry , 1986 .

[7]  S. Mauran,et al.  Application of the Carman–Kozeny Correlation to a High‐Porosity and Anisotropic Consolidated Medium: The Compressed Expanded Natural Graphite , 2001 .

[8]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Microscopic characterization of FO/PRO membranes--a comparative study of CLSM, TEM and SEM. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  A. Foissy,et al.  Hydraulic resistance measurements combined with electrical or diffusional resistance measurements for determination of pore size in MF membranes , 2001 .

[10]  W. C. Maskell Tortuosity factor in non-homogeneous membranes , 1993 .

[11]  Muna Al Mazrooei Modeling Water Flux in Forward Osmosis: Implications for Improved Membrane Design , 2013 .

[12]  B. Freeman,et al.  Surface modification of thin film composite membrane support layers with polydopamine: Enabling use , 2011 .

[13]  Hongtao Cui,et al.  X-ray computed tomography in Zernike phase contrast mode at 8 keV with 50-nm resolution using Cu rotating anode X-ray source , 2007 .

[14]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[15]  Zhangxin Chen,et al.  Critical review of the impact of tortuosity on diffusion , 2007 .

[16]  Andrea Achilli,et al.  Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes , 2013 .

[17]  Linda Zou,et al.  Recent developments in forward osmosis : opportunities and challenges. , 2012 .

[18]  L. Pisani Simple Expression for the Tortuosity of Porous Media , 2011 .

[19]  H. Giesche,et al.  Mercury Porosimetry: A General (Practical) Overview , 2006 .