Justifying the incorporation of the materials balance principle into frontier-based eco-efficiency models

Frontier-based models are an alternative to traditional eco-efficiency ratio indicators. This paper considers two different types, environmentally adjusted production efficiency models and frontier eco-efficiency models, and tries to find justification for incorporating the materials balance principle (MBP) in them. Similar importance is attached to the economic and environmental outcomes of a production process. Like economic outcomes can be derived from inputs and outputs and respective prices, some cases allow for deriving environmental outcomes from the production function with the MBP. After an overview of attempts to incorporate environmental issues in production efficiency models and some reflections why MBP has been neglected in environmental economics and production efficiency analysis, the paper gives basic principles to incorporate the MBP in conventional production efficiency methods and shows how this adjustment leads to a more diversified diagnosis of eco-efficiency. Finally, potentialities and bottlenecks are discussed. Exploiting the MBP in production efficiency and eco-efficiency analysis will facilitate more pro-active eco-efficiency research.

[1]  Ross McKitrick,et al.  A Derivation of the Marginal Abatement Cost Curve , 1999 .

[2]  R. Färe.  Derivation of Shadow Prices for Undesirable Outputs: A Distance Function Approach , 1993 .

[3]  K. Rennings.  Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics , 2000 .

[4]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[5]  M. Cropper,et al.  Environmental Economics: A Survey , 1992 .

[6]  C. Chavez,et al.  Nitrogen emissions from broilers measured by mass balance over eighteen consecutive flocks. , 2006, Poultry science.

[7]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[8]  Kingsley E. Haynes,et al.  Environmental decision models: U.S. experience and a new approach to pollution management , 1993 .

[9]  Stefan Baumgärtner,et al.  Necessity and Inefficiency in the Generation of Waste , 2003 .

[10]  A.G.J.M. Oude Lansink,et al.  Non-separability and heterogeneity in integrated agronomic-economic analysis of nonpoint-source pollution , 2001 .

[11]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[12]  Ludwig Lauwers,et al.  Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition , 2007 .

[13]  T. Hahn,et al.  Value‐oriented impact assessment: the economics of a new approach to impact assessment , 2004 .

[14]  Udo Ebert,et al.  Environmental Emissions and Production Economics: Implications of the Materials Balance , 2007 .

[15]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[16]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[17]  Stijn Reinhard,et al.  Nitrogen Efficiency of Dutch Dairy Farms: A Shadow Cost System Approach , 2000 .

[18]  Isabelle Piot-Lepetit,et al.  Pricing Organic Nitrogen Under The Weak Disposability Assumption: An Application to the French Pig Sector , 1998 .

[19]  R. Färe,et al.  An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms—application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities , 1996 .

[20]  R. Färe,et al.  Accounting for Air Pollution Emissions in Measures of State Manufacturing Productivity Growth , 2001 .

[21]  Stefan Baumgärtner,et al.  The concept of joint production and ecological economics , 2001 .

[22]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Why Eco‐efficiency? , 2005 .

[23]  J. Coggins,et al.  The Price of Pollution: A Dual Approach to Valuing SO2Allowances , 1994 .

[24]  D. Tyteca.  Sustainability Indicators at the Firm Level , 1998 .

[25]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  Linear Programming Models for the Measurement of Environmental Performance of Firms—Concepts and Empirical Results , 1997 .

[26]  Stuart B Hill,et al.  Evolving ecosystems approaches to fruit insect pest management , 1999 .

[27]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Eco‐efficiency and Its xsTerminology , 2005 .

[28]  R. Ayres,et al.  Production, Consumption, and Externalities , 1969 .

[29]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  SETAC-Europe: Second working group on LCIA (WIA-2): Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment: Background document for the second working group on life cycle impact assessment of SETAC-Europe (WIA-2) , 1999 .

[30]  M. Kortelainen,et al.  Dynamic environmental performance analysis: A Malmquist index approach , 2008 .

[31]  Stijn Reinhard,et al.  Econometric analysis of economic and environmental efficiency of Dutch dairy farms , 1999 .

[32]  Frank C. Krysiak,et al.  Production, consumption, and general equilibrium with physical constraints , 2003 .

[33]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  On the Measurement of the Environmental Performance of Firms— A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective , 1996 .

[34]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[35]  Mette Asmild,et al.  Economic versus environmental improvement potentials of Danish pig farms , 2006 .

[36]  Raimund Bleischwitz,et al.  Rethinking Productivity: Why has Productivity Focussed on Labour Instead of Natural Resources? , 2001 .

[37]  Uwe Latacz-Lohmann,et al.  Sustainability: a review of the debate and an extension , 1998 .

[38]  T. Hahn,et al.  Sustainable Value Added - Measuring Corporate Contributions to Sustainability Beyond Eco-Efficiency , 2004 .

[39]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  Towards indicators of sustainable development for firms: A productive efficiency perspective , 1999 .

[40]  Michael R. Langemeier,et al.  Direct and Indirect Shadow Price and Cost Estimates of Nitrogen Pollution Abatement , 2002 .

[41]  Frank Figge,et al.  The Cost of Sustainability Capital and the Creation of Sustainable Value by Companies , 2005 .

[42]  Agapi Somwaru,et al.  Incorporating indesirable outputs into models of production: an application to US agriculture , 1994 .

[43]  Rüdiger Pethig,et al.  The 'materials balance approach' to pollution: its origin, implications and acceptance , 2003 .

[44]  Holger Scheel,et al.  Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Sushama Murty,et al.  On modeling pollution-generating technologies , 2012 .

[46]  B. Field.  Environmental Economics: An Introduction , 1979 .

[47]  G. Huppes,et al.  A Framework for Quantified Eco‐efficiency Analysis , 2005 .

[48]  Frank Nevens,et al.  Operationalising eco-efficiency in agriculture: the example of specialised dairy farms in Flanders , 2007 .

[49]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Measuring Eco‐efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis , 2005 .

[50]  René Kleijn,et al.  The need for combining IEA and IE tools: The potential effects of a global ban on PVC on climate change , 2008 .

[51]  R. Pethig,et al.  Nonlinear Production, Abatement, Pollution and Materials Balance Reconsidered , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.