On linear models and parameter identifiability in experimental biological systems.

A key problem in the biological sciences is to be able to reliably estimate model parameters from experimental data. This is the well-known problem of parameter identifiability. Here, methods are developed for biologists and other modelers to design optimal experiments to ensure parameter identifiability at a structural level. The main results of the paper are to provide a general methodology for extracting parameters of linear models from an experimentally measured scalar function - the transfer function - and a framework for the identifiability analysis of complex model structures using linked models. Linked models are composed by letting the output of one model become the input to another model which is then experimentally measured. The linked model framework is shown to be applicable to designing experiments to identify the measured sub-model and recover the input from the unmeasured sub-model, even in cases that the unmeasured sub-model is not identifiable. Applications for a set of common model features are demonstrated, and the results combined in an example application to a real-world experimental system. These applications emphasize the insight into answering "where to measure" and "which experimental scheme" questions provided by both the parameter extraction methodology and the linked model framework. The aim is to demonstrate the tools' usefulness in guiding experimental design to maximize parameter information obtained, based on the model structure.

[1]  L. Ahlfors Complex analysis : an introduction to the theory of analytic functions of one complex variable / Lars V. Ahlfors , 1984 .

[2]  D. Sheff,et al.  Rab8 regulates basolateral secretory, but not recycling, traffic at the recycling endosome. , 2008, Molecular Biology of the Cell.

[3]  I. Mellman,et al.  Actin dependence of polarized receptor recycling in Madin-Darby canine kidney cell endosomes. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[4]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Parameter and structural identifiability concepts and ambiguities: a critical review and analysis. , 1980, The American journal of physiology.

[5]  Christopher R. Myers,et al.  Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  I. Chou,et al.  Recent developments in parameter estimation and structure identification of biochemical and genomic systems. , 2009, Mathematical biosciences.

[7]  E. Crampin SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION CHALLENGES FROM SYSTEMS BIOLOGY , 2006 .

[8]  J. Banga,et al.  Structural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  J. Nemcová Structural identifiability of polynomial and rational systems. , 2008, Mathematical biosciences.

[10]  William W. Chen,et al.  Classic and contemporary approaches to modeling biochemical reactions. , 2010, Genes & development.

[11]  Hidde de Jong,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Genetic Regulatory Systems: A Literature Review , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[12]  R. Teasdale,et al.  The Vps35 D620N Mutation Linked to Parkinson's Disease Disrupts the Cargo Sorting Function of Retromer , 2014, Traffic.

[13]  J. Timmer,et al.  Addressing parameter identifiability by model-based experimentation. , 2011, IET systems biology.

[14]  H. D. Jong,et al.  On the identifiability of metabolic network models , 2013, Journal of mathematical biology.

[15]  Michael P. H. Stumpf,et al.  Maximizing the Information Content of Experiments in Systems Biology , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  Maksat Ashyraliyev,et al.  Systems biology: parameter estimation for biochemical models , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[17]  F. Maxfield,et al.  Quantification of low density lipoprotein and transferrin endocytic sorting HEp2 cells using confocal microscopy. , 1994, Journal of cell science.

[18]  E. Voit,et al.  Regulation of glycolysis in Lactococcus lactis: an unfinished systems biological case study. , 2006, Systems biology.

[19]  K. Burrage,et al.  Linear models for endocytic transformations from live cell imaging , 2011 .

[20]  K. Burrage,et al.  Some novel techniques of parameter estimation for dynamical models in biological systems , 2013 .

[21]  R. Bellman,et al.  On structural identifiability , 1970 .

[22]  H. Pohjanpalo System identifiability based on the power series expansion of the solution , 1978 .

[23]  Ursula Klingmüller,et al.  Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood , 2009, Bioinform..

[24]  I. E. Nikerel,et al.  Model reduction and a priori kinetic parameter identifiability analysis using metabolome time series for metabolic reaction networks with linlog kinetics. , 2009, Metabolic engineering.

[25]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Linking data to models: data regression , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  A. Holmberg On the practical identifiability of microbial growth models incorporating Michaelis-Menten type nonlinearities , 1982 .

[27]  Maria Pia Saccomani,et al.  DAISY: A new software tool to test global identifiability of biological and physiological systems , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[28]  Eugenio Cinquemani,et al.  Identification of metabolic network models from incomplete high-throughput datasets , 2011, Bioinform..

[29]  Nicholas Hamilton,et al.  Quantification and its Applications in Fluorescent Microscopy Imaging , 2009, Traffic.