A generic hybrid model development for process analysis of industrial fixed-bed catalytic reactors

Catalyst deactivation is one of the major concerns in industrial catalytic reactors. The capability to perform detailed analysis of the catalytic process and its deactivation phenomenon is therefore vital in maintaining high productivity and product quality. Analysis and prediction of the catalyst deactivation mechanism and the rate of deactivation are among the most challenging endeavors in the area of the catalytic reactor modeling. Hence, the catalyst deactivation phenomenon requires detailed dynamic modeling to enable its performance to be closely scrutinized. In this paper, a hybrid model incorporating first principle model and artificial neural network (ANN) has been used to develop a generic framework to model the industrial fixed-bed catalytic reactors (FBCRs) experiencing catalyst deactivation. The model does not consider the complicated mechanism of catalyst deactivation, and its effect is incorporated employing ANN, which utilizes the catalytic process data. The generic modeling steps have been extensively described, and the developed model has been applied on two industrial case studies. The validation of each model was carried out signifying that the generalized model developed has acceptable accuracy. The model enabled the lifetime of the industrial Pd/C and CuO-ZnO-Al2O3 catalysts and the effects of the operating parameters on the hydropurification process and methanol production reactors to be predicted. The generic strategy presented can be utilized for the performance analysis of any FBCR disregarding the type of catalyst.

[1]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[2]  M. Nazari,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of an Industrial Ethylene Oxide (EO) Reactor Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) , 2011 .

[3]  G. P. Rangaiah,et al.  First-Principles, Data-Based, and Hybrid Modeling and Optimization of an Industrial Hydrocracking Unit , 2006 .

[4]  Heejin Lim,et al.  Modeling and Optimization of a Styrene Monomer Reactor System Using a Hybrid Neural Network Model , 2004 .

[5]  M. Kraume,et al.  Detailed numerical simulations of catalytic fixed-bed reactors: Heterogeneous dry reforming of methane , 2015 .

[6]  D. Mears,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for heat transport limitations in fixed bed reactors , 1971 .

[7]  Behrang Mansoornejad,et al.  A hybrid GA-SQP optimization technique for determination of kinetic parameters of hydrogenation reactions , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[8]  Feng Qian,et al.  Development of a Hybrid Model for Industrial Ethylene Oxide Reactor , 2012 .

[9]  Abbas Azarpour,et al.  Performance analysis of crude terephthalic acid hydropurification in an industrial trickle-bed reactor experiencing catalyst deactivation , 2012 .

[10]  Martin T. Hagan,et al.  Neural network design , 1995 .

[11]  Carlo Lamberti,et al.  0.5 wt.% Pd/C catalyst for purification of terephthalic acid: Irreversible deactivation in industrial plants , 2011 .

[12]  Neha Sharma,et al.  Model predictive control and neural network predictive control of TAME reactive distillation column , 2012 .

[13]  C. H. Bartholomew,et al.  Heterogeneous Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration: A Review , 2015 .

[14]  Chrysanthos E. Gounaris,et al.  Modelling of the performance of industrial HDS reactors using a hybrid neural network approach , 2005 .

[15]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Multiphase reactors – revisited , 1999 .

[16]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  A comparison of homogeneous and heterogeneous dynamic models for industrial methanol reactors in the presence of catalyst deactivation , 2005 .

[17]  D. T. Lynch,et al.  On the separability of catalyst activity and kinetic behavior , 1989 .

[18]  D. Mears,et al.  The role of axial dispersion in trickle-flow laboratory reactors , 1971 .

[19]  Hugo A. Jakobsen,et al.  Chemical Reactor Modeling , 2014 .

[20]  D. G. Tajbl,et al.  LABORATORY CATALYTIC REACTORS , 1974 .

[21]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  High-Pressure Trickle-Bed Reactors: A Review , 1997 .

[22]  M. S. Ananth,et al.  PERFORMANCE STUDY OF CERTAIN COMMERCIAL CATALYSTS IN HYDRODESULFURIZATION OF DIESEL OILS , 2001 .

[23]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Liquid distribution in trickle‐bed reactors: Part I. Flow measurements , 1978 .

[24]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Pressure drop and liquid holdup in high pressure trickle-bed reactors , 1994 .

[25]  H. S. Fogler,et al.  Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1986 .

[26]  Mohamed Azlan Hussain,et al.  Optimization strategy for long-term catalyst deactivation in a fixed-bed reactor for methanol synthesis process , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[27]  Wei Lu,et al.  A Neural Network Model for Local and Distortional Buckling Behaviour of Cold-Formed Steel Compression Members , 2001 .

[28]  E. A. Volkov.  Numerical Methods , 1986 .

[29]  Mohammad Farsi,et al.  Dynamic modeling and operability analysis of a dual-membrane fixed bed reactor to produce methanol considering catalyst deactivation , 2014 .

[30]  Sharifah Rafidah Wan Alwi,et al.  Prediction of Pd/C Catalyst Deactivation Rate and Assessment of Optimal Operating Conditions of Industrial Hydropurification Process , 2015 .

[31]  Jaroslav Prchlík,et al.  Liquid distribution in reactors with randomly packed porous beds , 1975 .

[32]  Akbar Zamaniyan,et al.  Comparative model analysis of the performance of tube fitted bulk monolithic catalyst with conventional pellet shapes for natural gas reforming , 2011 .

[33]  Payam Parvasi,et al.  Incorporation of Dynamic Flexibility in the Design of a Methanol Synthesis Loop in the Presence of Catalyst Deactivation , 2008 .

[34]  Junfei Qiao,et al.  Efficient self-organizing multilayer neural network for nonlinear system modeling , 2013, Neural Networks.

[35]  G. Froment,et al.  Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design , 1979 .

[36]  Sharifah Rafidah Wan Alwi,et al.  Catalytic activity evaluation of industrial Pd/C catalyst via gray-box dynamic modeling and simulation of hydropurification reactor , 2015 .

[37]  Magne Hillestad,et al.  Long term dynamic optimization of a catalytic reactor system , 1998 .

[38]  Magne Hillestad,et al.  Modeling and optimization of a reactor system with deactivating catalyst , 1999 .

[39]  Jaroslav Prchlík,et al.  Wall flow in trickle bed reactor , 1975 .

[40]  Stefano Peratello,et al.  Experimental methods in catalytic kinetics , 1999 .

[41]  Octave Levenspiel,et al.  Fluid dispersion-generalization and comparison of mathematical models—I generalization of models , 1962 .

[42]  Daniel Svozil,et al.  Introduction to multi-layer feed-forward neural networks , 1997 .

[43]  D. Mears,et al.  Tests for Transport Limitations in Experimental Catalytic Reactors , 1971 .

[44]  Junfei Qiao,et al.  Constructive algorithm for fully connected cascade feedforward neural networks , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[45]  Zhang Shao-gang,et al.  Mathematical Simulation of HydrOrefining Reactor for Terephthalic Acid , 2008 .

[46]  G. D. Bellos,et al.  Study of the catalyst deactivation in an industrial gasoil HDS reactor using a mini-scale laboratory reactor , 2008 .

[47]  Jinghong Zhou,et al.  Terephthalic acid hydropurification over Pd/C catalyst , 2006 .

[48]  G. Froment,et al.  Single Event Kinetic Modeling of the Methanol-to-Olefins Process on SAPO-34 , 2004 .

[49]  Sepehr Sadighi,et al.  Studying Catalyst Activity in an Isomerization Plant to Upgrade the Octane Number of Gasoline by Using a Hybrid Artificial‐Neural‐Network Model , 2013 .

[50]  Basudeb Saha,et al.  Optimisation of alkene epoxidation catalysed by polymer supported Mo(VI) complexes and application of artificial neural network for the prediction of catalytic performances , 2013 .