The Cognitive Life of Things

tiracial types perceived equally, or are certain mixes and base races discriminated against more than others? Will Hispanics, with sharpened demographic growth and their enduring racial malleability, succeed where the multiracial movement has failed, and could they ultimately undermine the “Anglo” racial system? The film highlights sociological studies that indicate generational change in racial self-identity. For example, firstgeneration Hispanics often have difficulty identifying with the country’s “racial pentagon,” but by the third generation are more likely to identify as white. If so, are Hispanics becoming the country’s largest minority, or are (some of them) in the process of transitioning to “whiteness”? These and other questions posed in the film speak to the growing fluidity and destabilization of the racial classification system in the United States. Multiracial Identity presents an air of inevitability regarding the unfolding future of a multiracial America. The film cites a Bureau of the Census prediction that by 2050, one in five Americans will identify as multiracial. Interracial relationships are on the rise, already constituting one-eighth of households in California, for instance, and multiracial celebrities and public figures increasingly populate the American cultural and media landscape. Of those that chose multiple racial categories in the 2000 census, 42% were under the age of 18, signaling a youthful charge against the country’s monoracial fixity. Public or institutional acceptance of these changes will not happen automatically, however. As the narrator concludes, “Too much of our everyday life in America is invested in racial differences to accept the overlapping multiracial existence.” Multiracial Identity is well suited for university undergraduate instruction. The film could be effectively paired both with conventional scholarly treatments of race in the United States and with anthropological or comparative studies of race in other countries and regions. As the film explores advocacy largely oriented around the positive valorization of racial identity, it not only complements more common treatments of race’s discriminatory dimensions, but it could also be used in dialogue with scholarship on ethnicity. The latter would be particularly useful given the overlap between public debates and political reaction surrounding both the “browning” and the so-called “hyphenization” of America. All told, Multiracial Identity offers an insightful and accessible contribution to the urgent and ever-shifting debates on race and identity, in America and beyond.

[1]  Timothy Webmoor,et al.  Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations under the Banner of a ‘Social’ Archaeology , 2008 .

[2]  R. Botha On the Soundness of Inferring Modern Language from Symbolic Behaviour , 2010, Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

[3]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[4]  A. Clark Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[5]  T. Ingold Lines: A Brief History , 2007 .

[6]  Chris Gosden,et al.  The cultural biography of objects , 1999 .

[7]  Carl Knappett,et al.  Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes , 2002 .

[8]  A. Nowell Human evolution, language and mind: A psychological and archaeological inquiry , 1999 .

[9]  E. Hutchins Material anchors for conceptual blends , 2005 .

[10]  Thomas Wynn,et al.  Hafted spears and the archaeology of mind , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  F. Adams,et al.  The bounds of cognition , 2001 .

[12]  Lev Vygotsky Mind in society , 1978 .

[13]  Andy Clark,et al.  Pressing the Flesh: A Tension in the Study of the Embodied, Embedded Mind?* , 2008 .

[14]  Andy Clark,et al.  Curing Cognitive Hiccups: A Defense Of The Extended Mind , 2007 .

[15]  C. Renfrew Commodification and institution in group-oriented and individualizing societies , 2001 .

[16]  Lambros Malafouris,et al.  Between brains, bodies and things: tectonoetic awareness and the extended self , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Igor Kopytoff The social life of things: The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process , 1986 .

[18]  B. Latour Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[19]  A. Clark Supersizing the Mind , 2008 .

[20]  A. Appadurai The social life of things: Toward an anthropology of thing , 1986 .

[21]  Danny Miller Material Culture and Mass Consumption , 1987 .

[22]  F. Varela Organism: A Meshwork of Selfless Selves , 1991 .

[23]  C S Smith Matter versus Materials: A Historical View. , 1968, Science.

[24]  M. Wheeler Reconstructing the Cognitive World: The Next Step , 2005 .

[25]  J. Barrett,et al.  A phenomenology of landscape , 2009 .

[26]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things that make us smart , 1979 .

[27]  P. Connerton How Societies Remember , 1989 .

[28]  Jeffrey B. Wagman Symmetry for the sake of symmetry, or symmetry for the sake of behavior? , 2002 .

[29]  Karenleigh A. Overmann Material Scaffolds in Numbers and Time , 2013 .

[30]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  Evocative objects : things we think with , 2007 .

[31]  Carl Knappett,et al.  Thinking through material culture , 2005 .

[32]  Dan Sperber,et al.  Seedless grapes: nature and culture , 2007 .

[33]  J. Hoskins Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of Peoples' Lives , 1998 .

[34]  Julian Thomas The trouble with material culture , 2007 .

[35]  Tim Ingold,et al.  Bindings against Boundaries: Entanglements of Life in an Open World , 2008 .

[36]  L. Malafouris The Cognitive Basis of Material Engagement: Where Brain, Body and Culture Conflate , 2004 .

[37]  R. Botha Prehistoric shell beads as a window on language evolution , 2008 .

[38]  A. Appadurai The thing itself , 2006 .

[39]  L. Meskell Introduction: Object Orientations , 2008 .

[40]  Chris Gosden,et al.  Social being and time , 1994 .

[41]  C. Renfrew Becoming human : The archaeological challenge , 2006 .

[42]  M. Schiffer The Material Life of Human Beings: Artifacts, Behavior and Communication , 1999 .

[43]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  Boundaries of the Mind: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences , 2004 .

[44]  Timothy Webmoor What about ‘one more turn after the social’ in archaeological reasoning? Taking things seriously , 2007 .

[45]  T. Ingold Materials against materiality , 2007, Archaeological Dialogues.

[46]  S. Engel Thought and Language , 1964 .

[47]  C. Frith,et al.  Introduction. The sapient mind: archaeology meets neuroscience , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  M. Donald A Mind So Rare: The Evolution of Human Consciousness , 2001 .

[49]  A. Clark,et al.  Books , 2004, INTR.

[50]  B. Latour Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[51]  L. Malafouris Beads for a Plastic Mind: the ‘Blind Man's Stick’ (BMS) Hypothesis and the Active Nature of Material Culture , 2008, Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

[52]  Andrew Meirion Jones,et al.  Memory and Material Culture , 2007 .

[53]  A. Clark,et al.  The Extended Mind , 1998, Analysis.

[54]  Marius Kwint,et al.  Material memories : design and evocation , 1999 .

[55]  J. Wertsch Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action , 1992 .

[56]  Julian Thomas,et al.  Archaeology and modernity , 2004 .

[57]  Chris Gosden,et al.  What Do Objects Want? , 2005 .