Spotlight on microspherical nanoscopy: Experimental quantification of super-resolution

A classification of label-free super-resolution imaging mechanisms is given based on the nonlinear reduction of the point-spread function (PSF), near-field scanning, image magnification and gain, structured and sparse illumination, and information approaches. We argue that the super-resolution capability of contact microspheres stems from an image magnification effect taking place in close proximity to the object with contributions of its optical near-fields. We discuss several conditions for quantifying the super-resolution in a label-free microscopy: i) use of standalone objects or long-period arrays as opposed to subwavelength periodic structures, ii) use a convolution with two-dimensional PSF for calculating images, and iii) avoidance of coherent imaging which can lead to dramatic artifacts. We demonstrate a resolution of ∼λ/7 for imaging nanoplasmonic structures and propose a combination of microspherical nanoscopy with nanoplasmonic illumination for imaging biomedical samples. We applied these techniques for imaging actin protein filaments and yeast cells and observed a resolution advantage over standard microscopy.

[1]  A. Maslov,et al.  Optical nanoscopy with contact Mie-particles: Resolution analysis , 2017 .

[2]  V. Astratov,et al.  Reply to “Comment on ‘Super‐resolution microscopy by movable thin‐films with embedded microspheres: Resolution analysis’ [Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 527, 513 (2015)]” , 2016 .

[3]  Alexey V. Maslov,et al.  Imaging of sub-wavelength structures radiating coherently near microspheres , 2016 .

[4]  Vladimir Liberman,et al.  Optical nanoscopy with contact microlenses overcomes the diffraction limit , 2016 .

[5]  Javier Aizpurua,et al.  Mapping the near fields of plasmonic nanoantennas by scattering‐type scanning near‐field optical microscopy , 2015 .

[6]  Dennis E Walker,et al.  Overcoming the diffraction limit of imaging nanoplasmonic arrays by microspheres and microfibers. , 2015, Optics express.

[7]  Y. Wang,et al.  Adiabatic far-field sub-diffraction imaging , 2015, Nature Communications.

[8]  Vladimir Liberman,et al.  Super‐resolution microscopy by movable thin‐films with embedded microspheres: Resolution analysis , 2015 .

[9]  Natalia M. Litchinitser,et al.  Non-resonant hyperlens in the visible range , 2015, 2015 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[10]  Xudong Chen,et al.  Focusing and imaging in microsphere-based microscopy. , 2015, Optics express.

[11]  Omer Tzang,et al.  Super-resolution in label-free photomodulated reflectivity. , 2015, Nano letters.

[12]  Natalia M. Litchinitser,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a non-resonant hyperlens in the visible spectral range , 2015, Nature communications.

[13]  Stefan W. Hell,et al.  Nanoscopy with focused light , 2013, 2015 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[14]  Vahid Sandoghdar,et al.  Light microscopy: an ongoing contemporary revolution , 2014, 1412.3255.

[15]  Arash Darafsheh,et al.  Advantages of microsphere-assisted super-resolution imaging technique over solid immersion lens and confocal microscopies , 2014 .

[16]  Satoshi Kawata,et al.  Measurement of a saturated emission of optical radiation from gold nanoparticles: application to an ultrahigh resolution microscope. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[17]  Nikolay I. Zheludev,et al.  Optical super-oscillations: sub-wavelength light focusing and super-resolution imaging , 2013 .

[18]  Ji-Xin Cheng,et al.  Far-field Imaging of Non-fluorescent Species with Sub-diffraction Resolution , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[19]  Arash Darafsheh,et al.  Optical super-resolution by high-index liquid-immersed microspheres , 2012 .

[20]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Sparsity-based single-shot subwavelength coherent diffractive imaging , 2012, 2012 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[21]  Mark R. Dennis,et al.  A super-oscillatory lens optical microscope for subwavelength imaging. , 2012, Nature materials.

[22]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Sparsity-based single-shot sub-wavelength coherent diffractive imaging , 2011, 2012 IEEE 27th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel.

[23]  Hooman Mohseni,et al.  Opto-mechanical force mapping of deep subwavelength plasmonic modes. , 2011, Nano letters.

[24]  Zengbo Wang,et al.  Optical virtual imaging at 50 nm lateral resolution with a white-light nanoscope. , 2011, Nature communications.

[25]  I. I. Smolyaninov,et al.  Maxwell fisheye and Eaton lenses emulated by microdroplets , 2010, CLEO: 2011 - Laser Science to Photonic Applications.

[26]  Zhaowei Liu,et al.  Plasmonic structured illumination microscopy. , 2010, Nano letters.

[27]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Super-resolution and reconstruction of sparse sub-wavelength images. , 2009, Optics express.

[28]  Zhaowei Liu,et al.  Superlenses to overcome the diffraction limit. , 2008, Nature materials.

[29]  Zhaowei Liu,et al.  Far-Field Optical Hyperlens Magnifying Sub-Diffraction-Limited Objects , 2007, Science.

[30]  Alessandro Salandrino,et al.  Far-field subdiffraction optical microscopy using metamaterial crystals: Theory and simulations , 2006 .

[31]  Z. Jacob,et al.  Optical Hyperlens: Far-field imaging beyond the diffraction limit. , 2006, Optics express.

[32]  M. Gustafsson Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  A. Zayats,et al.  Far-field optical microscopy with a nanometer-scale resolution based on the in-plane image magnification by surface plasmon polaritons. , 2005, Physical review letters.