Quantifying target spotting performances with complex geoscientific imagery using ERP P300 responses

Geoscientific data interpretation is a challenging task, which requires the detection and synthesis of complex patterns within data. As a first step towards better understanding this interpretation process, our research focuses on quantitative monitoring of interpreters' brain responses associated with geoscientific target spotting. This paper presents a method that profiles brain responses using electroencephalography (EEG) to detect P300-like responses that are associated with target spotting for complex geoscientific data. In our experiment, eight interpreters with varying levels of expertise and experience were asked to detect features, which are likely to be copper-gold rich porphyry systems within magnetic geophysical data. The target features appear in noisy background and often have incomplete shape. Magnetic images with targets and without targets were shown to participants using the ''oddball'' paradigm. Event related potentials were obtained by averaging the EEG epochs across multiple trials and the results show delayed P3 response to the targets, likely due to the complexity of the task. EEG epochs were classified and the results show reliable single trial classification of EEG responses with an average accuracy of 83%. The result demonstrated the usability of the P300-like responses to quantify the geoscientific target spotting performances.

[1]  Roberto Togneri,et al.  Identifying effective interpretation methods for magnetic data by profiling and analyzing human data interactions , 2013 .

[2]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication , 2008 .

[3]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[4]  C. C. Duncan,et al.  Season, gender, and P300 , 1994, Biological Psychology.

[5]  A. Kok.  Overlap between P300 and movement-related-potentials: A response to Verleger , 1988, Biological Psychology.

[6]  Olivier Pietquin,et al.  Single-trial P300 detection with Kalman filtering and SVMs , 2011, ESANN.

[7]  A. S. Rodionov,et al.  Comparison of linear, nonlinear and feature selection methods for EEG signal classification , 2004, International Conference on Actual Problems of Electron Devices Engineering, 2004. APEDE 2004..

[8]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Andreas Keil,et al.  Single-trial P300 estimation with a spatiotemporal filtering method , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  J. Polich,et al.  Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[11]  R. McCarley,et al.  Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Juliana Yordanova,et al.  On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3 , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[13]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Single Trial P300 Recognition in a Virtual Environment , 1998 .

[14]  S. Luck.  An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[15]  Peter G. Caryl,et al.  Event Related Potentials (ERPs) in Elementary Cognitive Tasks Reflect Task Difficulty and Task Threshold. , 1996 .

[16]  R. Johnson,et al.  On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Paul Sajda,et al.  Comparing Neural Correlates of Visual Target Detection in Serial Visual Presentations Having Different Temporal Correlations , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[18]  Helge J. Ritter,et al.  BCI competition 2003-data set IIb: support vector machines for the P300 speller paradigm , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Larry W. Thompson,et al.  Auditory averaged evoked potentials and aging: Factors of stimulus, task and topography , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[20]  C. C. Duncan,et al.  Event-related potentials in clinical research: Guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400 , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  P. Sajda,et al.  Cortically coupled computer vision for rapid image search , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  M. Thulasidas,et al.  Robust classification of EEG signal for brain-computer interface , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[23]  J. Polich,et al.  P300, probability, and interstimulus interval. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[24]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  Z. Shipton,et al.  What do you think this is? "Conceptual uncertainty" in geoscience interpretation , 2007 .

[26]  Misha Pavel,et al.  Rapid image analysis using neural signals , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[27]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[28]  P. England.  John Perry’s neglected critique of Kelvin’s age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics , 2006 .

[29]  Anders M. Fjell,et al.  P300 and Neuropsychological Tests as Measures of Aging: Scalp Topography and Cognitive Changes , 2004, Brain Topography.

[30]  Kerry L. Coburn,et al.  Effects of aerobic exercise and gender on visual and auditory P300, reaction time, and accuracy , 1999, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[31]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  Misha Pavel,et al.  A framework for rapid visual image search using single-trial brain evoked responses , 2011, Neurocomputing.

[33]  E. Rankey.  Interpreter's Corner—That's why it's called interpretation: Impact of horizon uncertainty on seismic attribute analysis , 2003 .

[34]  Dean J Krusienski,et al.  A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[35]  Jonathan Foster,et al.  Quantitative assessment of 2D versus 3D visualisation modalities , 2011, 2011 Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP).

[36]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  An efficient P300-based brain–computer interface for disabled subjects , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[37]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Automatic identification of responses from porphyry intrusive systems within magnetic data using image analysis , 2011 .

[38]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[39]  Kristin P. Bennett,et al.  Support vector machines: hype or hallelujah? , 2000, SKDD.

[40]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 as a clinical assay: rationale, evaluation, and findings. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[41]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[42]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.