Free Speech in Public Employment: Has the Supreme Court Clarified Matters? An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Lane v Franks

Abstract We employ a counterfactual treatment effect analysis to evaluate whether U.S. Courts of Appeals judges have changed their propensity to vote against plaintiffs in public employment free speech disputes following the Supreme Court’s 2015 Lane v Franks decision. In order to ensure a like-for-like comparison of votes before and after the Lane decision we employ a variant of the “straddle” approach, which entails identifying cases caught in the crosshairs of the upper court’s ruling and then comparing the votes with those of cases already decided. Our results underscore the importance of paying close attention to selection effects when evaluating the impact of legal changes on judicial behavior.

[1]  J. Connolly,et al.  The Garcetti Effect and the Erosion of Free Speech Rights of K–12 Public Education Employees: Trends and Implications , 2017, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[2]  William H. J. Hubbard.  The Effects of Twombly and Iqbal , 2017 .

[3]  Michael A. Gottfried.  The Role of Attending Center-Based Care for Kindergarten-Aged Children with Disabilities , 2017, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[4]  Heidi Kitrosser.  The Special Value of Public Employee Speech , 2016, The Supreme Court Review.

[5]  Jeffrey M. Hirsch.  The Supreme Court's 2013-2014 Labor and Employment Law Decisions: Consensus at the Court , 2014 .

[6]  Julian W. Kleinbrodt.  Pro-Whistleblower Reform in the Post-Garcetti Era , 2013 .

[7]  D. Engstrom.  The 'Twiqbal' Puzzle and Empirical Study of Civil Procedure , 2013 .

[8]  William H. J. Hubbard.  Testing for Change in Procedural Standards, with Application to Bell Atlantic v. Twombly , 2013, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[9]  Michael Heise,et al.  Ideology 'All the Way Down'? An Empirical Study of Establishment Clause Decisions in the Federal Courts , 2012 .

[10]  T. Keenan.  Circuit Court Interpretations of Garcetti V. Ceballos and the Development of Public Employee Speech , 2011 .

[11]  Joseph Mead.  Stare Decisis in the Inferior Courts of the United States , 2011 .

[12]  Scott R. Bauries,et al.  Coloring Outside the Lines: Garcetti v. Ceballos in the Federal Appellate Courts , 2011 .

[13]  V. Baird,et al.  Judicial Agenda Setting Through Signaling and Strategic Litigant Responses , 2010 .

[14]  Helen L. Norton.  Constraining Public Employee Speech: Government's Control of its Workers' Speech to Protect its Own Expression , 2009 .

[15]  D. Greiner.  Causal Inference in Civil Rights Litigation , 2008 .

[16]  F. Cross.  Decisionmaking in the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals , 2003 .

[17]  P. Holland.  Statistics and Causal Inference , 1985 .

[18]  Lucian Arye Bebchuk,et al.  Litigation and Settlement under Imperfect Information , 1984 .

[19]  Benjamin Klein,et al.  The Selection of Disputes for Litigation , 1984, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[20]  Benjamin Johnson.  The Supreme Court's Political Docket: How Ideology and the Chief Justice Control the Court's Agenda and Shape Law , 2018 .

[21]  M. Strasser.  Pickering, Garcetti, & Academic Freedom , 2018 .

[22]  Joseph Deloney.  Protecting Public Employee Trial Testimony , 2016 .

[23]  E. Schoen.  Completing Government Speech's Unfinished Business: Clipping Garcetti's Wings and Addressing Scholarship and Teaching , 2016 .

[24]  Raymond H. Brescia,et al.  THE TWIQBAL PUZZLE AND EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CIVIL PROCEDURE , 2013 .

[25]  Martha Dragich.  Uniformity, Inferiority, and the Law of the Circuit Doctrine , 2010 .

[26]  Margaret Meriwether Cordray,et al.  Strategy in Supreme Court Case Selection: The Relationship Between Certiorari and the Merits , 2008 .

[27]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  BEST PRACTICES IN QUASI- EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS Matching Methods for Causal Inference , 2007 .

[28]  Ralph P. Hall,et al.  Understanding and applying the concept of sustainable development to transportation planning and decision-making in the U.S. , 2006 .

[29]  Susan Glaspell,et al.  The verge , 1922 .