New endoscopic ultrasonography criteria for malignant lymphadenopathy based on inter-rater agreement

Background and aims Various studies have been previously conducted on the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy as benign or malignant, but the results vary. These studies did not describe the inter-rater agreement on the EUS features of lymphadenopathy. In this study, we evaluate the inter-rater agreement on EUS features and propose EUS diagnostic norms for lymphadenopathy based on inter-rater agreement. Method A total of 68 lymph nodes subjected to EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA) were reviewed by five endoscopic experts. The EUS features evaluated lymph node size, shape, border, margin, echogenicity, homogeneity, and the hilum of the lymph node. Inter-rater agreement (multi-rater kappa statics) was performed. We established new criteria using results with a high degree of inter-rater agreement from EUS features and compared them with the former criteria. Result There was a moderate agreement on shape, kappa (K) = 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34–0.54), and fair agreement on echogenicity, homogeneity, border, and hilum of the lymph node, K (95% CI) = 0.33 (0.17–0.38), 0.34 (0.26–0.35), 0.22 (0.21–0.31), and 0.22 (0.11–0.26), respectively. This resulted in the establishment of new EUS diagnostic criteria using shape, long axis > 20 mm and short axis > 10 mm. New criteria were superior to old criteria (area under the curve 0.82 vs 0.52, P < 0.001). Conclusion EUS diagnostic criteria for lymphadenopathy based on inter-rater agreement were more accurate than old criteria. This result will be useful for the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy.

[1]  J. Iglesias-Garcia,et al.  Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in the evaluation of lymph nodes enlargement in the absence of on-site pathologist , 2017, World journal of gastroenterology.

[2]  S. Elkholy,et al.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and cytology for differentiating benign from malignant lymph nodes. , 2017, Arab journal of gastroenterology : the official publication of the Pan-Arab Association of Gastroenterology.

[3]  B. Han,et al.  Sonographic Features of Endobronchial Ultrasonography Predict Intrathoracic Lymph Node Metastasis in Lung Cancer Patients. , 2015, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  Can Xu,et al.  Differentiation of Pancreatic Cancer and Chronic Pancreatitis Using Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Images: A Diagnostic Test , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  A. Chak,et al.  Characterization of the pancreas in vivo using EUS spectrum analysis with electronic array echoendoscopes. , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  M. Wallace,et al.  Interobserver Agreement on the Endosonographic Features of Lymph Nodes in Aerodigestive Malignancies , 2011, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[7]  R. Hawes,et al.  Conventional versus Rosemont endoscopic ultrasound criteria for chronic pancreatitis: comparing interobserver reliability and intertest agreement. , 2011, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.

[8]  Zhaoshen Li,et al.  Differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer from normal tissue with digital imaging processing and pattern recognition based on a support vector machine of EUS images. , 2010, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[9]  C. Dietrich,et al.  Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between benign and malignant mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes , 2008, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[10]  C. Lightdale,et al.  Interobserver agreement for EUS findings in familial pancreatic-cancer kindreds. , 2007, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[11]  D. Schwartz,et al.  Routine vs. selective EUS-guided FNA approach for preoperative nodal staging of esophageal carcinoma. , 2006, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[12]  A. Irisawa,et al.  Quantitative analysis of endosonographic parenchymal echogenicity in patients with chronic pancreatitis , 2004, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[13]  V. Chen,et al.  Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration is Superior to Lymph Node Echofeatures: A Prospective Evaluation of Mediastinal and Peri-Intestinal Lymphadenopathy , 2004, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[14]  M. Wallace,et al.  The utility of EUS and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration in detecting celiac lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer: a single-center experience. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[15]  D. Faigel.  EUS in patients with benign and malignant lymphadenopathy , 2001 .

[16]  R. Hawes,et al.  A comparison of the accuracy of echo features during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of malignant lymph node invasion. , 1997, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[17]  J. Seitz,et al.  Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Guided by Endoscopic Ultrasonography: Results in 141 Patients , 1995, Endoscopy.

[18]  M. Catalano,et al.  Endosonographic features predictive of lymph node metastasis. , 1994, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[19]  N. Tohnosu,et al.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of cervical lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer with special reference to the relationship between the short to long axis ratio (S/L) and the cancer content , 1989, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[20]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[21]  Kenneth K Wang,et al.  Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound Imaging in Distinguishing Celiac Ganglia From Celiac Lymph Nodes , 2019, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.