Identifying operational requirements to select suitable decision models for a public sector e-procurement decision support system

Public sector procurement should be a transparent and fair process. Strict legal requirements are enforced on public sector procurement to make it a standardised process. To make fair decisions on selecting suppliers, a practical method which adheres to legal requirements is important. The research that is the base for this paper aimed at identifying a suitable Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method for the specific legal and functional needs of the Maldivian Public Sector. To identify such operational requirements, a set of focus group interviews were conducted in the Maldives with public officials responsible for procurement decision making. Based on the operational requirements identified through focus groups, criteria-based evaluation is done on published MCDA methods to identify the suitable methods for e-procurement decision making. This paper describes the identification of the operational requirements and the results of the evaluation to select suitable decision models for the Maldivian context.

[1]  A. Weele,et al.  Purchasing and supply chain management : analysis, planning and practice , 2000 .

[2]  Hokey Min,et al.  International Supplier Selection : : A Multi-attribute Utility Approach , 2022 .

[3]  Ruey-Chyn Tsaur,et al.  Decision risk analysis for an interval TOPSIS method , 2011, Appl. Math. Comput..

[4]  Adel Guitouni,et al.  Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Christian Tabi Amponsah.  APPLICATION OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING PROCESS TO DETERMINE CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROCUREMENT OF CAPITAL PROJECTS UNDER PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS , 2011 .

[6]  Guo Chao Alex Peng,et al.  Information Systems Evaluation: Methodologies and Practical Case Studies , 2013 .

[7]  A. Rizzi,et al.  A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services , 2006 .

[8]  J. Kitzinger,et al.  Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice , 1998 .

[9]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[10]  Drakoulis Martakos,et al.  In-depth analysis and simulation study of an innovative fuzzy approach for ranking alternatives in multiple attribute decision making problems based on TOPSIS , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[11]  Ian Alexander,et al.  An introduction to qualitative research , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Analyzing and Reporting Focus Group Results , 1997 .

[13]  U. Flick.  An introduction to qualitative research, 4th ed. , 2009 .

[14]  P. Fraser Johnson,et al.  Purchasing and Supply Management , 2001 .

[15]  D. Morgan.  Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[16]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[17]  Ali Mohaghar,et al.  An integrated group decision-making process for supplier selection and order allocation using multi-attribute utility theory and linear programming , 2008, J. Frankl. Inst..

[18]  Fabio Sciancalepore,et al.  Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  John F Woodward,et al.  Procurement Systems - A guide to Best Practice in Construction , 2001 .

[20]  J. Ivey.  Focus groups. , 2011, Pediatric nursing.

[21]  A. Weele.  Purchasing and Supply Chain Management: Analysis, Strategy, Planning and Practice , 2009 .

[22]  David L. Olson,et al.  Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models , 2004, Math. Comput. Model..

[23]  Wilbur B. England.  The purchasing system , 1967 .

[24]  Robert D. Anderson,et al.  The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform: The WTO regime on government procurement: past, present and future , 2011 .

[25]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[26]  Pedro Isaias,et al.  Information Systems Research and Exploring Social Artifacts: Approaches and Methodologies , 2012 .

[27]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study , 2000 .

[28]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  David L. Olson,et al.  Verbal Decision Analysis , 2005 .

[30]  Hokey Min.  International Supplier Selection , 1994 .

[31]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Extension of TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data: Interval efficiency , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[32]  Shiu-li Huang,et al.  Designing utility-based recommender systems for e-commerce: Evaluation of preference-elicitation methods , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..