Assessment of Visualization Interfaces for Assisting the Development of Multi-level Cognitive Maps

People often become disoriented and frustrated when navigating complex, multi-level buildings. We argue that the principle reason underlying these challenges is insufficient access to the requisite information needed for developing an accurate mental representation, called a multi-level cognitive map. We postulate that increasing access to global landmarks i.e., those visible from multiple locations/floors of a building will aid spatial integration between floors and the development of these representations. This prediction was investigated in three experiments, using either direct perception or Augmented Reality AR visualizations. Results of Experiment 1 demonstrated that increasing visual access to a global landmark promoted multi-level cognitive map development, supporting our hypothesis. Experiment 2 revealed no reliable performance benefits of using two minimalist icon-based and wire-frame visualization techniques. Experiment 3, using a third X-ray visualization, showed reliably better performance for not only a no-visualization control but also the gold standard of direct window access. These results demonstrate that improving information access through principled visualizations benefit multi-level cognitive map development.

[1]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Is elevation encoded in cognitive maps , 1990 .

[2]  Nicholas A. Giudice,et al.  The effects of 2D and 3D maps on learning virtual multi-level indoor environments , 2013, MapInteract '13.

[3]  Jakob N. Foerster,et al.  Three-dimensional head-direction coding in the bat brain , 2014, Nature.

[4]  Nicholas A. Giudice,et al.  The Effects of Visual Granularity on Indoor Spatial Learning Assisted by Mobile 3D Information Displays , 2012, Spatial Cognition.

[5]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  What counts as the evidence for three-dimensional and four-dimensional spatial representations? , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  Markus Knauff,et al.  Up the down staircase : Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings , 2006 .

[7]  E. Tolman Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[8]  Kathryn J Jeffery,et al.  Navigating in a three-dimensional world. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[9]  Nicholas A. Giudice,et al.  Using Mobile 3D Visualization Techniques to Facilitate Multi-level Cognitive Map Development of Complex Indoor Spaces , 2012 .

[10]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  Getting Lost in Buildings , 2010 .

[11]  Roberta L Klatzky,et al.  The planar mosaic fails to account for spatially directed action , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  Arindam Dey,et al.  Lessons learned: Evaluating visualizations for occluded objects in handheld augmented reality , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[14]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Navigating in a Virtual 3D Maze: Body and Gravity, Two Possible Reference Frames for Perceiving and Memorizing , 2004, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[15]  Nachum Ulanovsky,et al.  Representation of Three-Dimensional Space in the Hippocampus of Flying Bats , 2013, Science.

[16]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Multi-floor buildings and human wayfinding cognition , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Christian Freksa,et al.  "Spatial and Visual Components in Mental Reasoning About Space" Editorial , 2005 .

[18]  Paul N. Wilson,et al.  An Investigation into Vertical Bias Effects , 2007, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[19]  Nicholas A. Giudice,et al.  The informatics of indoor and outdoor space: a research agenda , 2010, ISA '10.

[20]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  The Role of Global and Local Landmarks in Virtual Environment Navigation , 2000, Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ..