How to Improve the Outcome of State Welfare Services. Governance in A Systems-Theoretical Perspective

Much governance literature deals with the limited capacity of the state and the market to govern core state welfare services such as education, scientific research and healthcare. Rather less attention has been focused on how the outcome of these services can be improved politically. An analysis of Niklas Luhmann's systems theory (Luhmann 1997a, 2000) leads to the hypothesis that self-governance, that is, a combination of professional autonomy and public peer-evaluation, is a superior strategy. Though this may seem counterintuitive at first glance, this paper shows that it corresponds to well-rooted principles of public administration and, in the sphere of education, to empirical findings on school choice and school effectiveness. This raises new perspectives for future comparative governance studies.

[1]  Andrew Dunsire,et al.  Tipping the Balance , 1996 .

[2]  Renate Mayntz,et al.  Governing Failures and the Problem of Governability: Some Comments on a Theoretical Paradigm , 1993 .

[3]  N. Luhmann,et al.  Limits of Steering , 1997 .

[4]  Derek Neal,et al.  How Vouchers Could Change the Market for Education , 2002 .

[5]  Charles Taylor,et al.  Neutrality in political science , 1985 .

[6]  Gunther Teubner.  After Privatization? The Many Autonomies of Private Law , 1998 .

[7]  Mark Schneider,et al.  What Research Can Tell Policymakers about School Choice , 2001 .

[8]  F. Scharpf.  Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism In Policy Research , 1997 .

[9]  Kenneth J. Meier,et al.  Principal-Agent Models: An Expansion? , 1998 .

[10]  M. Brans,et al.  The autopoiesis of administrative systems: Niklas Luhmann on public administration and public policy , 1997 .

[11]  Politics, Bureaucrats, and Schools. , 1994 .

[12]  P. McEwan.  The Potential Impact of Large-Scale Voucher Programs , 2000 .

[13]  G. Miller.  Above Politics: Credible Commitment and Efficiency in the Design of Public Agencies , 2000 .

[14]  B. Peters,et al.  Governance without government? Rethinking public administration , 1998 .

[15]  H. Levin.  Educational vouchers: Effectiveness, choice, and costs , 1998 .

[16]  Bob Jessop,et al.  Governance and Metagovernance: On Reflexivity, Requisite Variety, and Requisite Irony. , 2003 .

[17]  C. Offe,et al.  Contradictions of the Welfare State , 1985 .

[18]  M. King,et al.  Luhmann's social theory , 2003 .

[19]  Renate Mayntz,et al.  New challenges to governance theory , 1998 .

[20]  Terry M. Moe,et al.  Politics, Markets, and the Organization of Schools , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[21]  I. Down.  Central Bank Independence, Disinflations, and the Sacrifice Ratio , 2004 .

[22]  L. Summers,et al.  Central Bank Independence and Macroeconomic Performance: Some Comparative Evidence , 1993 .

[23]  G. Stoker.  Governance as theory: five propositions , 1998 .

[24]  M. Flinders,et al.  Governance in Whitehall , 2002 .

[25]  Renate Mayntz,et al.  Zur Selektivität der steuerungstheoretischen Perspektive , 2001 .

[26]  Bob Jessop,et al.  The Future of the Capitalist State , 2002 .

[27]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 2020, On Violence.

[28]  N. Luhmann.  Political Theory In The Welfare State , 1990 .

[29]  E. Hanushek,et al.  The Failure of Input-Based Schooling Policies , 2002 .

[30]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  School Vouchers: A Critical View , 2002 .

[31]  Gene V. Glass,et al.  Politics, Markets, and America's Schools , 1990 .

[32]  Günther Teubner,et al.  Kontext und Autonomie: Gesellschaftliche Selbststeuerung durch reflexives Recht , 1984 .

[33]  Pam Sammons,et al.  Forging Links: Effective Schools and Effective Departments , 1997 .

[34]  Bob Jessop,et al.  The regulation approach, governance and post-Fordism: alternative perspectives on economic and political change? , 1995 .