Combining Brains: A Survey of Methods for Statistical Pooling of Information

More than one subject is scanned in a typical functional brain imaging experiment. How can the scientist make best use of the acquired data to map the specific areas of the brain that become active during the performance of different tasks? It is clear that we can gain both scientific and statistical power by pooling the images from multiple subjects; furthermore, for the comparison of groups of subjects (clinical patients vs healthy controls, children of different ages, left-handed people vs right-handed people, as just some examples), it is essential to have a "group map" to represent each population and to form the basis of a statistical test. While the importance of combining images for these purposes has been recognized, there has not been an organized attempt on the part of neuroscientists to understand the different statistical approaches to this problem, which have various strengths and weaknesses. In this paper we review some popular methods for combining information, and demonstrate the surveyed techniques on a sample data set. Given a combination of brain images, the researcher needs to interpret the result and decide on areas of activation; the question of thresholding is critical here and is also explored.

[1]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[2]  C. T. Rajagopal Some limit theorems , 1948 .

[3]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[4]  K. Worsley,et al.  Local Maxima and the Expected Euler Characteristic of Excursion Sets of χ 2, F and t Fields , 1994, Advances in Applied Probability.

[5]  K. Pearson ON A METHOD OF DETERMINING WHETHER A SAMPLE OF SIZE n SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN DRAWN FROM A PARENT POPULATION HAVING A KNOWN PROBABILITY INTEGRAL HAS PROBABLY BEEN DRAWN AT RANDOM , 1933 .

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[7]  B WILKINSON,et al.  A statistical consideration in psychological research. , 1951, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Generalisability, Random Effects & Population Inference , 1998, NeuroImage.

[9]  Ethel Shanas The American Soldier: Vol. I: Adjustment During Army Life.Samuel A. StoufferThe American Soldier: Vol. II: Combat and Its Aftermath.Samuel A. Stouffer , 1950 .

[10]  M. Mintun,et al.  Positron emission tomography study of voluntary saccadic eye movements and spatial working memory. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  R. Rosenthal The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[12]  D. P. Gaver,et al.  Combining Information: Statistical Issues and Opportunities for Research , 1993 .

[13]  C. Genovese,et al.  Estimating test‐retest reliability in functional MR imaging I: Statistical methodology , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  H. O. Lancaster THE COMBINATION OF PROBABILITIES: AN APPLICATION OF ORTHONORMAL FUNCTIONS , 1961 .

[15]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1930, Nature.

[16]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[18]  N. Minshew,et al.  Neocortical system abnormalities in autism: An fMRI study of spatial working memory , 2002, Neurology.

[19]  Ronald Bremer,et al.  Estimation of variance components and applications , 1988 .

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A test for a conjunction , 2000 .

[21]  R. R. Bahadur Rates of Convergence of Estimates and Test Statistics , 1967 .

[22]  R. Rosenthal Combining results of independent studies. , 1978 .

[23]  Cidambi Srinivasan,et al.  Combining Information: Statistical Issues and Opportunities for Research , 1993 .

[24]  W. N. Venables,et al.  Estimation of Variance Components and Applications. , 1990 .

[25]  Ramon C. Littell,et al.  Asymptotic Optimality of Fisher's Method of Combining Independent Tests , 1971 .

[26]  David R. Jones,et al.  Meta-analysis: weighing the evidence. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  Jay Brand,et al.  File Drawer Problem , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[28]  Satish Iyengar Much Ado about Meta-Analysis , 1991 .

[29]  Arthur Cohen,et al.  Asymptotically Optimal Methods of Combining Tests , 1979 .

[30]  M. Kendall Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[31]  C. R. Rao,et al.  Estimation of variance and covariance components--MINQUE theory , 1971 .

[32]  W. G. Cochran The combination of estimates from different experiments. , 1954 .

[33]  R. Woods Modeling for Intergroup Comparisons of Imaging Data , 1996, NeuroImage.

[34]  R. R. Bahadur Some Limit Theorems in Statistics , 1987 .

[35]  Jagdish S. Rustagi,et al.  Symposium on Optimizing Methods in Statistics , 1971 .

[36]  J D Watson,et al.  Nonparametric Analysis of Statistic Images from Functional Mapping Experiments , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[37]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.