Understanding dynamics of polarization via multiagent social simulation

[1]  L. Rossi,et al.  How minimizing conflicts could lead to polarization on social media: An agent-based model investigation , 2022, PloS one.

[2]  Pengpeng Li,et al.  A Survey on Online Political Participation, Social Capital, and Well-Being in Social Media Users—Based on the Second Phase of the Third (2019) TCS Taiwan Communication Survey Database , 2022, Frontiers in Psychology.

[3]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Polarization in Geometric Opinion Dynamics , 2021, EC.

[4]  Alexander G. Chkhartishvili,et al.  Users’ Activity in Online Social Networks and the Formation of Echo Chambers , 2020, 2020 13th International Conference "Management of large-scale system development" (MLSD).

[5]  Tinggui Chen,et al.  Modeling Public Opinion Polarization in Group Behavior by Integrating SIRS-Based Information Diffusion Process , 2020, Complex..

[6]  Benjamin K. Johnson Selective Exposure , 2020, The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology.

[7]  Benjamin K. Johnson,et al.  Issues, involvement, and influence: Effects of selective exposure and sharing on polarization and participation , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Yonghwan Kim How Cross-Cutting News Exposure Relates to Candidate Issue Stance Knowledge, Political Polarization, and Participation: The Moderating Role of Political Sophistication , 2019, International Journal of Public Opinion Research.

[9]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  A Geometric Model of Opinion Polarization , 2019, Mathematics of Operations Research.

[10]  Taufiq Ahmad,et al.  The Use of Social Media on Political Participation Among University Students: An Analysis of Survey Results From Rural Pakistan , 2019, SAGE Open.

[11]  Igor M. Sokolov,et al.  Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks , 2019, Physical review letters.

[12]  Chao Wang,et al.  Progressive Information Polarization in a Complex-Network Entropic Social Dynamics Model , 2019, IEEE Access.

[13]  Ashley Jardina,et al.  Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology , 2019 .

[14]  Taylor W. Brown,et al.  Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Minjie Zhang,et al.  A Multi-agent System for Modelling Preference-Based Complex Influence Diffusion in Social Networks , 2018, Comput. J..

[16]  Benjamin K. Johnson,et al.  Confirmation biases in selective exposure to political online information: Source bias vs. content bias , 2017 .

[17]  Hsuan-Ting Chen,et al.  Social media and online political participation: The mediating role of exposure to cross-cutting and like-minded perspectives , 2016, Telematics Informatics.

[18]  Jaime Simão Sichman,et al.  Classifying sanctions and designing a conceptual sanctioning process model for socio-technical systems , 2016, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[19]  Karine Nahon,et al.  Where There is Social Media There is Politics , 2015 .

[20]  Yonghwan Kim,et al.  Does Disagreement Mitigate Polarization? How Selective Exposure and Disagreement Affect Political Polarization , 2015 .

[21]  A. J. Morales,et al.  Measuring Political Polarization: Twitter shows the two sides of Venezuela , 2015, Chaos.

[22]  Shelley Boulianne Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research , 2015 .

[23]  Zhe Zhang,et al.  Exploiting sentiment homophily for link prediction , 2014, RecSys '14.

[24]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  Choice and Preference in Media Use : Advances in Selective Exposure Theory and Research , 2014 .

[25]  Benjamin K. Johnson,et al.  Implications of Pro- and Counterattitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization , 2014 .

[26]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  A New Space for Political Behavior: Political Social Networking and its Democratic Consequences , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Kensuke Okada Is Omega Squared Less Biased? a Comparison of Three Major Effect Size Indices in One-Way Anova , 2013 .

[28]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Learning to Discover Social Circles in Ego Networks , 2012, NIPS.

[29]  N. Stroud Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure , 2010 .

[30]  Matthew J. Lindberg,et al.  Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  Natalie Jomini Stroud,et al.  Media Effects, Selective Exposure, and Fahrenheit 9/11 , 2007 .

[32]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers , 2007 .

[33]  Charles S. Taber,et al.  Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs , 2006 .

[34]  Reid Hastie,et al.  What Happened on Deliberation Day? , 2006 .

[35]  Michael F. Meffert,et al.  The Effects of Negativity and Motivated Information Processing During a Political Campaign. , 2006 .

[36]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network , 2003, KDD '03.

[37]  D. Green,et al.  Voting May Be Habit-Forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment , 2003 .

[38]  David P. Redlawsk Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making , 2002, The Journal of Politics.

[39]  Diana C. Mutz The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation , 2002 .

[40]  M. Newman,et al.  Mixing patterns in networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  Diana C. Mutz Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[42]  J. Cappella,et al.  Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? , 2002 .

[43]  Nicholas A. Valentino,et al.  Event-Driven Political Communication and the Preadult Socialization of Partisanship , 1998 .

[44]  大野 茂,et al.  Polarization , 2006, A First Course in Laboratory Optics.

[45]  Richard A. Parker,et al.  Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide , 1992 .

[46]  W. Beyer CRC Standard Probability And Statistics Tables and Formulae , 1990 .

[47]  D. O. Sears,et al.  Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism Versus Racial Threats to the Good Life , 1981 .

[48]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[49]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[50]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[51]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[52]  Brian Groombridge,et al.  The Effects of Mass Communication , 1965, Mental Health.

[53]  T. L. Kelley,et al.  An Unbiased Correlation Ratio Measure. , 1935, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  D. Lakens,et al.  When power analyses based on pilot data are biased: Inaccurate effect size estimators and follow-up bias , 2018 .

[55]  A. Baxter Modeling Public Opinion , 2018 .

[56]  Minjie Zhang,et al.  Preference Aware Influence Maximization , 2017 .

[57]  Benjamin K. Johnson,et al.  Selective Exposure for Better or Worse: Its Mediating Role for Online News' Impact on Political Participation , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[58]  Maciej Tomczak,et al.  The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size , 2014 .

[59]  Stanford,et al.  Learning to Discover Social Circles in Ego Networks , 2012 .

[60]  Adam Kowol The theory of cognitive dissonance By , 2008 .

[61]  D. Rucinski The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1994 .

[62]  A. Sockloff,et al.  Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: (revised edition), by Jacob Cohen. New York: Academic Press, 1977, xv + 474 pp., $24.50. , 1978 .