Reducing the risk of peripherally inserted central catheter line complications in the oncology setting.

At our institution, a retrospective review of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in oncology patients had previously demonstrated a complication rate of 40.7%. Since then we have implemented strategies to reduce complications including staff and patient education, insertion technique modification and PICC maintenance utilizing a PICC nurse. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the recent PICC complication rate and to compare it with the previously reported findings. Prospectively collected PICC complication data and medical records from all patients with solid tumours who had PICCs inserted in 2003 were analysed. A historical cohort comparative analysis was performed using our PICC complication rate from 2000 to 2001. Eighty-eight PICC lines were inserted in 73 patients under radiological guidance. The median PICC dwell time was 44 days (1-524 days). The overall complication rate was 15.9% (14/88) or 2.0 complications per 1,000 PICC-days. Infections developed in 5.7% (5/88) and thrombotic events occurred in 4.5% (4 /88) of PICCs. The mean time to complication was 45 days. The complication rate for 2003 was significantly lower than the rate for 2001 (P = 0.006), especially of infective complications (P = 0.004). Strategies introduced to reduce PICC complications may have been the reason for this improvement.

[1]  J. R. Smith,et al.  Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited. , 1998, American journal of surgery.

[2]  R A Weinstein,et al.  Prevention of peripheral venous catheter complications with an intravenous therapy team: a randomized controlled trial. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  K. Sepkowitz,et al.  Complication rates among cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  C. Alvarado,et al.  Prospective randomised trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters , 1991, The Lancet.

[5]  B. Koczwara,et al.  High rate of complications associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in patients with solid tumours , 2004, Internal medicine journal.

[6]  J. Cardella,et al.  Cumulative experience with 1,273 peripherally inserted central catheters at a single institution. , 1996, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[7]  A. Ellrodt,et al.  Peripherally inserted central catheters in general medicine. , 1997, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[8]  Leonard Mermel,et al.  Prevention of Intravascular CatheterRelated Infections , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  Susanne M. Smorenburg,et al.  Thrombosis prophylaxis in patient populations with a central venous catheter: a systematic review. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  R. D. McCormick,et al.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2002, Infection control and hospital epidemiology.