An Examination of Ecologically Concerned Consumers and Their Intention to Purchase Ecologically Packaged Products

Packaging is a major contributor to the escalating solid waste stream. This paper presents results of a study that attempts to determine variables which can be used to discriminate between groups that are and are not willing to purchase ecologically packaged products. Attitude toward ecologically conscious living, attitude toward litter, locus of control and the perception of pollution as a problem were found to be significant discriminating variables. Implications for marketers and public policymakers are provided, as well as directions for future research.

[1]  Thomas C. Kinnear,et al.  Ecologically Concerned Consumers: Who are They? , 1974 .

[2]  A. Larkin.  Environmental Impact and Institutional Adjustment: Application of Foster’s Principles to Solid Waste Disposal , 1986 .

[3]  F. Cross.  The weaning of the green: Environmentalism comes of age in the 1990s , 1990 .

[4]  Philip Kotler,et al.  Marketing during Periods of Shortage , 1974 .

[5]  Lawrence A. Crosby,et al.  Ecological Concern, Attitudes, and Social Norms in Voting Behavior , 1986 .

[6]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Environmental Concern , 1981 .

[7]  Package size and solid waste , 1985 .

[8]  A. Winefield,et al.  The personal interests questionnaire: A task-specific measure of locus of control and motivation for use in learned helplessness research , 1986 .

[9]  M. P. Maloney,et al.  A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. , 1975 .

[10]  Harold H. Kassarjian,et al.  Incorporating Ecology into Marketing Strategy: The Case of Air Pollution , 1971 .

[11]  Rudolph Rummel,et al.  Understanding factor analysis , 1967 .

[12]  R. Middleton.  Alienation, Race, and Education , 1963 .

[13]  Thomas C. Kinnear,et al.  The Effect of Ecological Concern on Brand Perceptions , 1973 .

[14]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[15]  M. Rothschild.  Marketing Communications in Nonbusiness Situations or why its so Hard to Sell Brotherhood like Soap , 1979, Journal of marketing.

[16]  Lawrence A. Crosby,et al.  Psychological Commitment and Its Effects on Post-Decision Evaluation and Preference Stability among Voters , 1983 .

[17]  Lawrence A. Crosby,et al.  Consumer Satisfaction with Michigan's Container Deposit Law—An Ecological Perspective , 1982 .

[18]  F. Webster.  Determining the Characteristics of the Socially Conscious Consumer , 1975 .

[19]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence , 1980 .

[20]  Lawrence A. Crosby,et al.  Consumer/Voter Behavior in the Passage of the Michigan Container law , 1981 .

[21]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  THE TRADITIONAL SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PERSONALITY , 1968 .

[22]  William B. Locander,et al.  Environmentally Concerned Consumers-Racial Variations , 1978 .

[23]  I. Balderjahn,et al.  Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns , 1988 .

[24]  William L. Kovacs,et al.  The Coming Era of Conservation and Industrial Utilization of Recyclable Materials , 1988 .

[25]  W. Rathje.  The Garbàge Decade , 1984 .

[26]  Diane M. Samdahl,et al.  Social Determinants of Environmental Concern , 1989 .

[27]  R. Fisher.  THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[28]  L. Levitt,et al.  Litter Reduction , 1986 .