Discrimination of cues in mazes: a resolution of the place-vs.-response question.

[1]  W. S. Hunter.  The Sensory Control of the Maze Habit in the White Rat , 1929 .

[2]  W. S. Hunter.  A Consideration of Lashley's Theory of the Equipotentiality of Cerebral Action , 1930 .

[3]  W. S. Hunter.  A Further Consideration of the Sensory Control of the Maze Habit in the White Rat , 1930 .

[4]  E. Tolman,et al.  Studies in spatial learning; place learning versus response learning. , 1946, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  B. Ritchie.  Studies in spatial learning; two paths to the same location and two paths to two different locations. , 1947, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  H. Blodgett,et al.  Place versus response learning in the simple T-maze. , 1947, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  E. Tolman,et al.  Studies in spatial learning; response learning vs. place learning by the non-correction method. , 1947, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  H. Blodgett,et al.  Relative strength of place and response learning in the T maze. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[9]  H. Blodgett,et al.  Spatial learning in the T-maze; the influence of direction, turn, and food location. , 1949, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  M. E. Thompson,et al.  Reactive inhibition as a factor in maze learning; the role of reactive inhibition in studies of place learning versus response learning. , 1949, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  H. Gleitman,et al.  Studies in spatial learning: VII. Place and response learning under different degrees of motivation. , 1949 .

[12]  B. Ritchie,et al.  Studies in spatial learning; place performance and the acquisition of place dispositions. , 1950, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  N. Munn.  Handbook of psychological research on the rat , 1950 .

[14]  A study in place and response learning as a discrimination behavior. , 1951, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[15]  B. Ritchie,et al.  Studies in spatial learning. IX. A dispositional analysis of response-performance. , 1951, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[16]  D. Rethlingshafer,et al.  The role of response and place learning under alternating hunger and thirst drives. , 1951, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[17]  K. Montgomery.  A test of two explanations of spontaneous alternation. , 1952, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[18]  L. Thune,et al.  Place and response learning in the white rat under simplified and mutually isolated conditions. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  M. Glanzer,et al.  The role of stimulus satiation in spontaneous alternation. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  E. Galanter,et al.  Cue vs. reactive inhibition in place and response learning. , 1954, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[21]  F. Restle.  A theory of discrimination learning. , 1955, Psychological review.

[22]  S. Gans,et al.  A comparison of place and response learning in very young rats. , 1955, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[23]  D. P. Scharlock,et al.  The role of extramaze cues in place and response learning. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Choice alternation. I. Stimulus vs. place vs. response. , 1955, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[25]  Place and response learning: learning to alternate. , 1955, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[26]  F RESTLE,et al.  Theory of selective learning with probable reinforcements. , 1957, Psychological review.